Rethinking soil water repellency and its management

A Correction to this article was published on 03 December 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Soil water repellency (SWR) is a widespread challenge to plant establishment and growth. Despite considerable research, it remains a recalcitrant problem for which few alleviation technologies or solutions have been developed. Previous research has focused on SWR as a problem to be overcome; however, it is an inherent feature of many native ecosystems where it contributes to ecosystem functions. Therefore, we propose a shift in the way SWR is perceived in agriculture and in ecological restoration, from a problem to be solved to an opportunity to be harnessed. A new focus on potential ecological benefits of SWR is particularly timely given increasing incidence, frequency and severity of hotter droughts in many regions of the world. Our new way of conceptualising SWR seeks to understand how SWR can be temporarily alleviated at a micro-scale to successfully establish plants, and then harnessed in the longer term and at larger spatial scales to enhance soil water storage to act as a “drought-proofing” tool for plant survival in water-limited soils. For this to occur, we suggest research focusing on the alignment of physico-chemical and microbial properties and dynamics of SWR and, based on this mechanistic understanding, create products and interventions to improve success of plant establishment in agriculture, restoration and conservation contexts. In this paper, we outline the rationale for a new way of conceptualising SWR, and the research priorities needed to fill critical knowledge gaps in order to harness the ecological benefits from managing SWR.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Change history

  • 03 December 2019

    The article entitled ���Rethinking soil water repellency and its management���, which is part of the special issue on ���Applying microbial communities to improve restoration and conservation outcomes��� was published prematurely in Volume 220, Issue 10, October 2019.

References

  1. Berglund K, Persson L (1996) Water repellence of cultivated organic soils. Acta Agric Scand Sect B - Soil Plant Sci 46(3):145–152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisdom EBA, Dekker LW, Schoute JFT (1993) Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwell PS (1993) Improving sustainable production from water repellent sands. West Aust J Agric 34:160–167

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackwell PS (2000) Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. J Hydrol 231:384–395

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bond RD (1964) The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils II. Aust J Soil Res 2:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel NRR, Uddin SMM, Harper RJ, Henry DJ (2019) Soil water repellency: a molecular-level perspective of a global environmental phenomenon. Geoderma 338:56–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeBano L (1981) Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Gen Tech Rep PSW 21:46

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeBano LF (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. J Hydrol 231:195–206

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Boersma OH (1998) Effect of drying temperature on the severity of soil water repellency. Soil Sci 163:780–796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1994) How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour Res 30:2507–2517

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diehl D (2013) Soil water repellency: dynamics of heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids Surf A 432:8–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydrogeomorphological significance. Earth-Sci Rev 51:33–65

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doerr SH, Llewellyn CT, Douglas P, Morley CP, Mainwaring KA, Haskins C, Johnsey L, Ritsema CJ, Stagnitti F, Allinson G, Ferreira AJD, Keizer JJ, Ziogas AK, Diamantis J (2005) Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin. Aust J Soil Res 43:225–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards TJ, Nutt BJ, Yates RJ, O'Hara GW, Van-Wyk BE, Howieson JG (2019) A ley-farming system for marginal lands based upon self-regenerating perennial pasture legume. Agron Sustain Dev 39:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0558-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feeney DS (2004) Impact of fungi upon soil water relations PhD Thesis. University of Abertay Dundee, United Kingdom.

  16. Feeney DS, Hallett PD, Rodger S, Bengough AG, White NA, Young IM (2006) Impact of fungal and bacterial biocides on microbial induced water repellency in arable soil. Geoderma 135:72–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Flematti G, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2004) A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 304:977

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goebel MO, Bachmann J, Reichstein M, Janssens IA, Guggenberger G (2011) Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition—is there a link to extreme climatic events? Glob Change Biol 17:2640–2656

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hallett PD, Young IM (1999) Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity. Eur J Soil Sci 50:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harper RJ, McKissock I, Gilkes RJ, Carter DJ, Blackwell PS (2000) A multivariate framework for interpreting the effects of soil properties, soil management and landuse on water repellency. J Hydrol 231:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harper RJ, Sochacki SJ, Smettem KRJ, Robinson N (2014) Managing water in agricultural landscapes with short-rotation biomass plantations. GCB Bioenergy 6:544–555

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hiller D, Berliner J (1974) Waterproofing surface-zone soil aggregates for water conservation. Soil Sci 118:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  23. House MG (1991) Select committee enquiry into land conservation. Legislative Assembly, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  24. Howieson JG, Yates RJ, Foster KJ, Real D, Besier RB (2008) Prospects for the future use of legumes. In: Dilworth Michael J, James Euan K, Sprent Janet I, Newton William E (eds) N-fixing leguminous symbiosis, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 363–394

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imeson AC, Verstraten JM, van Mulligen EJ, Sevink J (1992) The effects of fire and water repellency on infiltration and runoff under Mediterranean type forest. CATENA 19(3–4):345–361

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lin C, Chou W, Tsai J, Lin W (2006) Water repellency of Casuarina windbreaks (Casuarina equisetifolia Forst.) caused by fungi in central Taiwan. Ecol Eng 26:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lowe M, Mathes F, Loke MH, McGrath G, Murphy DV, Leopold M (2019) Bacillus subtilis and surfactant amendments for the breakdown of soil water repellency in a sandy soil. Geoderma 244:108–118

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lozano E, Jimenez-Pinilla P, Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, Barcenas GM, Gonzalez-Perez JA, Garcia-Orenes F, Torres MP, Mataix-Beneyto J (2013) Biological and chemical factors controlling the patchy distribution of soil water repellency among plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest. Geoderma 207–208:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  29. Madsen MD, Kostka SJ, Inouye AL, Zvirzdin DL (2012) Postfire restoration of soil hydrology and wildland vegetation using surfactant seed coating technology. Rangel Ecol Manag 65:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  30. Madsen MD, Davies KW, Boyd CS, Kerby JD, Svejcar TJ (2016) Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration. Restor Ecol 24:S77–S84

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mallik AU, Rahman AA (1985) Soil water repellency in regularly burned Calluna heathlands: comparison of three measuring techniques. J Environ Manag 20:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Dekker SC, Dekker LW, Chen B (2019) Understanding the mechanisms of soil water repellency from nanoscale to ecosystem scale: a review. J Soils Sediments 19:171–185

    Google Scholar 

  33. McKissock I, Gilkes RJ, Harper RJ, Carter DJ (1998) Relationships of water repellency to soil properties for different spatial scales of study. Aust J Soil Res 36:495–507

    Google Scholar 

  34. McKissock I, Walker EL, Gilkes RJ, Carter DJ (2000) The influence of clay type on reduction of water repellency by applied clays: a review of some WestAustralian work. J Hydrol 231–232:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  35. Műller K, Deurer M (2011) Review of the remediation strategies for soil water repellency. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:208–221

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rillig CM, Mardatin NF, Leifheit EF, Antunes PM (2010) Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases soil water repellency and is sufficient to maintain water-stable soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1189–1191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ritz K (2007) The plate debate: cultivable communities have no utility in contemporary environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:358–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roper MM (2004) The isolation and characterisation of bacteria with the potential to degrade waxes that cause water repellency in sandy soils. Aust J Soil Res 42:427–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roper MM (2005) Managing soils to enhance the potential for bioremediation of water repellency. Aust J Soil Res 43:803–810

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Roper MM (2006) Potential for remediation of water repellent soils by inoculation with wax-degrading bacteria in south-western Australia. Biol Bratisl 61(19):358–362

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roper MM, Ward PR, Keulen AF, Hill JR (2013) Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil Tillage Res 126:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  42. Roper MM, Davies SL, Blackwell PS, Hall DJM, Bakker DM, Jongepier R, Ward PR (2015) Management options for water-repellent soils in Australian dryland agriculture. Soil Res 53:786–806

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ruthrof KX, Bader MKF, Matusick G, Jakob S, Hardy GEJ (2015) Promoting seedling physiological performance and early establishment in degraded Mediterranean-type ecosystems. New For 47:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rye K, Smettem KRJ (2017) The effect of water repellent soil surface layers on preferential flow and bare soil evaporation. Geoderma 207–208:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scott DF (1993) The hydrological effects of fire in South African mountain catchments. J Hydrol 150:409–432

    Google Scholar 

  46. Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Conte P, Haberbauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1839–1851

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tibbett M (2000) Roots, foraging and the exploitation of soil nutrient patches: the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Funct Ecol 14:397–399

    Google Scholar 

  48. Uddin SMM, Daniel NRR, Harper RJ, Henry DJ (2017) Why do biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) derived from vegetation fire not induce soil water repellency? Biogeochemistry 134:147–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Walden LL, Harper RJ, Mendham DS, Henry DJ, Fontaine JB (2015) Eucalyptus reforestation induces soil water repellency. Soil Res 53:168–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ward PR, Oades JM (1993) Effect of clay mineralogy and exchangeable cations on water repellency in clay-amended sandy soils. Aust J Soil Res 31:351–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ward PR, Roper MM, Jongpier R, Fernandez MA (2013) Consistent plant residue removal causes decrease in minimum soil water content in a Mediterranean environment. Biologia 68:1128–1131

    Google Scholar 

  52. Woche SK, Goebel MO, Kirkham MB, Horton R, Van DerPloeg RR, Bachmann J (2005) Contact angle of soils as affected by depth, texture and land management. Eur J Soil Sci 56:239–251

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yeap SGH, Bell RW, Scanlan C, Harper RJ (2018) Topsoil water repellence increased early wheat growth and nutrition. In: Hulugalle N, Biswas T, Greene R, Bacon P (eds) Proceedings of the National Soils Conference, Canberra 18–23 November, 2018.

  54. Zheng W, Morris EK, Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2016) Interplay of soil water repellency, soil aggregation and organic carbon. A meta-analysis. Geoderma 283:39–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by ECU Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University (ECU Industry Award and Athena Swan Kick-Start Science Prize) and Murdoch University. This work was partly undertaken under the Centre of Climate Change, Woodland and Forest Health, which is a partnership between private industry, community groups, Universities, and the Government of Western Australia. The authors would also like to thank Jodi Burgess for the graphic design (jajographics.com.au).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katinka X. Ruthrof.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by Dafeng Hui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruthrof, K.X., Hopkins, A.J.M., Danks, M. et al. Rethinking soil water repellency and its management. Plant Ecol 220, 977–984 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00967-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drought
  • Fertiliser
  • Hydrophobicity
  • Microbial activity
  • Nonwetting soils
  • Runoff