Skip to main content

Understanding the impact of plant–arthropod interactions, pollination, and canopy light on the rare orchid, small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)

Plant Ecology volume 220, pages 563–576 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent work has warned of a global crisis for terrestrial orchids and an urgent need for conservation. Pollinator declines have been documented globally, which may exacerbate the pollination limitations orchids experience. Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) (Pursh) Raf. is a North American terrestrial orchid considered vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, threatened in Canada and USA, and endangered in 20 states. Like many orchids, it has specialized habitat needs and fragmented populations. Here, plants were monitored diurnally and nocturnally throughout the flowering period to evaluate arthropod activity that might impact pollination. Ultraviolet photographs and spectrophotometric data were collected on flowers. Canopy light penetrance was measured at plants. Seed capsule production was evaluated over time. In sum, 41 flowers were monitored for > 300 h, resulting in > 140,000 photographic frames of compiled video. In this extensive monitoring, 33 plant–arthropod interactions were detected, only one likely to facilitate self-pollination, and none that facilitated outcrossing. UV absorbance was identified on petals and sepals, which contrasted starkly with whorl UV reflectance, a previously undescribed form of floral display visible to pollinators. Flowering plants grew in higher light than vegetative ones. Capsule production was highly variable over time, making the species vulnerable to 'bad years' and low effective population size, given the low genetic diversity previously identified, and lack of outcrossing detected here. Imminent attention is warranted for species-level protection, consistent with needs of other terrestrial orchids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Argue CL (2012) The pollination biology of North American orchids: 2 North of Florida and Mexico. Springer, New York, pp 167–184

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, O’Grady JJ, Chapman AP, Burgman MA, Akcakaya HR, Frankham R (2000) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brumback WE, Cairns S, Sperduto MS, Fyler CW (2011) Response of an Istoria medeoloides population to canopy thinning. Northeast Nat 18(2):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Villalobos L, Silva-Arias GA, Buzatto CR, Nervo MH, Singer RB (2017) Generalized food-deception pollination in four Cattleya (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae) species from Southern Brazil. Flora 234:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns S (2001) Isotria medeoloides recovery activities in New Hampshire. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KM (2003) Vanilloideae. In: Pridgeon A, Cribb P, Chase MW, Rasmussen F (eds) Genera Orchidacearum. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 281–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KM (2009) On the value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences for reconstruction the phylogeny of vanilloid orchids (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae). Ann Bot 104:377–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. PNAS USA 108(2):662–667

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Shi J, Shangguan F-Z, Dafni A, Deng Z-H, Luo Y-B (2009) The pollination of a self-incompatible, food-mimic orchid, Coelogyne fimbriata (Orchidaceae) by female Vespula wasps. Ann Bot 104:565-571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L (1996) Optimal sets of color receptors and color opponent systems for coding of natural objects in insect vision. J Theor Biol 181:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1862) On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1876) The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin E (2007) Geographic distribution of genetic variation in the rare orchid Isotria medeoloides. Student thesis. Colby College, Waterville ME pp 1-35

  • Dressler R (1993) Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Torices R, Lorite J, Klingenberg CP, Perfectti F (2016) The role of pollinators in the evolution of corolla shape variation, disparity and integration in a highly diversified plant family with a conserved floral bauplan. Ann Bot 117(5):889–904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert C (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory LL (1988) Small whorled pogonia, Isotria medeoloides (Pursh) Raf., in Maine and its relevance to the Critical Areas Program. Planning report No. 24, Critical Areas Program, State Planning Office, Augusta, ME

  • Grixti JC, Wong LT, Cameron SA, Favret C (2009) Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest. Biol Conserv 142(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera J (2005) Flower size variation in Rosmarinus officinalis. Individuals, populations and habitats. Ann Bot 95:431–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM, Pellmyer O (2002) Plant animal interactions: An evolutionary approach. Wiley- Blackwell, Hobokin

    Google Scholar 

  • Horth L, Campbell L, Bray R (2014) Wild bees preferentially visit Rudbeckia flower heads with exaggerated ultraviolet absorbing floral guides. Bio Open 3:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson P (2007) A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants. Evol 56:2368–2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard SD, Nelson XJ, Edwards GB, Barrion AT (2001) Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar. J. Zool London 255:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalisz S, Horth L, McPeek MA (1997) Fragmentation and the role of seed banks in promoting persistence in isolated populations of Collinsia verna. In: Schwartz, M.W. (ed) Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp WK, Wiegand R (2014) Orchid (Orchidaceae) decline in the Catoctin Mountains, Frederick Country, Maryland as documented by a long-term data set. Biodivers Conserv 23(8):1965–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM, Brittain C, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ricketts TH (2016) Modeling the status, trends and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. PNAS 113(1):140–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koopowitz H (2001) Orchids and their conservation. Portland Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick GA, McCormick MK, Mirenda T, Whigham DF (2013) The status and future of orchid conservation in North America. Ann Mo Bot Gard 99:180–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull T, Hutchings MJ (2006) A comparative analysis of decline in the distribution ranges of orchid species in Estonia and the United Kingdom. Biol Conserv 129(1):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy R (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection and population subdivision. Cons Biol 1:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1979) Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am Nat 113:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luer CA (1975) The Native Orchids of the United States and Canada, excluding FL. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli G, Moraes MA (2013) Livro vermelho da flora do Brasil. CNC-Flora pp 1100 ISBN: 978 85 88742 58 1

  • McCormick MK, Jacquemyn H (2014) What constrains the distribution of orchid populations? New Phytol 202(2):392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrhoff LA (1983) Pollination in the genus Istoria (Orchidaceae). Amer J Bot 70:1444–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel M, Sletvold N, Ågren J, Hansson B (2015) Inbreeding affects gene expression differently in two self-incompatible Arabidopsis lyrata populations with similar levels of inbreeding depression. Mol Biol Evol 32:2036–2047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Menges E (1992) Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK (eds) Conservation Biology. Springer, Boston, pp 253–275

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Menges E (2000) Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. TREE 15(2):51–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery AD (2014) Predicting threatened orchid (Isotria medeoloides [Pursh] Raf.) habitat in the southern Appalachian Region using Maxent. ProQuest LLC, pp 186

  • Nilsson L (1992) Long pollinia on eyes: hawk-moth pollination of Cynorkis uniflora Lindley (Orchidaceae) in Madagascar. Bot Jour Linn Soc 109:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1969) Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansarin ER, de Barros F (2008) Taxonomic notes of Pogonieae (Orchidaceae): Cleistesiopsis, a new genus segregated from Cleistes, and description of two new South American species, Cleistes batistana and C. elongata. Kew Bull 63:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansarin ER, Salatino A, Pansarin LM, Sazima M (2012) Pollination systems in Pogonieae (Orchidaceae: Vanilloideae): A hypothesis of evolution among reward and rewardless flowers. Flora (Jena) 207:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansarin ER, Aguiar JMRVB, Pansarin LM (2014) Floral biology and histochemical analysis of Vanilla edwallii Hoehne (Orchidaceae: Vanilloideae): an orchid pollinated by Epicharis (Apidae: Centridini). Plant Species Biol 29:242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HA (1995) Anthecological observations on Dendrochilum longibracteatum, a species pollinated by facultatively anthophilous insects. Lindleyana 10:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (2010) Essentials of Conservation Biology, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 250–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JL, Wyatt R (1990) Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris. Evolution 44:121–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW, Kelly D, Ladley JJ (2011) Futile selfing in the trees Fuchsia excorticata (Onagraceae) and Sophora microphylla (Fabaceae): inbreeding depression over 11 years. Int J Plant Sci 172(2):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero GA (1981) Cattleya violacea hosts a flower spider. Amer Orchid Soc Bull 50(1):28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicard A, Lenhard M (2011) The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Ann of Bot 107:1433–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer RB (2002) The pollination biology of Sauroglossum elatum Lindl. (Orchidaceae: Spiranthinae): moth-pollination and protandry in netotropical Spiranthinae. Bot Jour Linn Soc 138(1):9-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson JG, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V (2003) The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol Lett 6:1025–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1957) Self fertilization and population variability in higher plants. Am Nat 91:337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1974) Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone JL (2006) AFLP fingerprints of the rare orchid Isotria medeoloides suggest little genetic variation within or among populations. In: Section 2: Summary Small Whorled Pogonia Work (E-2-19), Maine Natural Areas Program report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, MA pp 5

  • Stone JL, Crystal PA, Devlin EE, Downer Downer RH, Cameron DS (2012) Highest genetic diversity at the northern range limit of the rare orchid Isotria medeoloides. Heredity 109:215–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swarts ND, Dixon KW (2009) Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Ann Bot 104:543–556

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  • Treher A, Sharman J, Frances A, Poff K (2015) Istoria medeoloides. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T64176265215480

  • USFWS (1980) Proposal to determine Isotria medeoloides (small whorled pogonia) to be an Endangered Species. Fed Regis 45(178):59909–59914

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (1982) Determination of Isotria medeoloides (small whorled pogonia) to be an endangered species. Fed Regis 47:39827–39831

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (1992) Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Recovery Plan, first revision. USFWS Region Five, Newton Corner MA, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (1994) Final rule to reclassify the plant Isotria medeoloides (small whorled pogonia) from endangered to threatened. Fed Reg 59:50852–50857

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (2007) Initiation of a 5-year review of ten listed northeastern species. Fed Reg 72:4018–4019

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (1985) Small whorled pogonia recovery plan. Newton Corner MA pp 38

  • USFWS (2008) Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides). 5-year review: Summary and evaluation. USFWS, NE Field Office, Concord NH. pp 25

  • van Der Cingel NA (2001) An atlas of orchid pollination: European orchids 1st edn. pp 260. CRC Press Taylor & Francis, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl L, Dodson CH (1966) Orchid flowers: their pollination and evolution. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt P, Campbell CS (1997) Reproductive biology of Isotria medeoloides (Orchidaceae). Rhodora 99(897):56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt-Schilb H, Munoz F, Franck R, Schatz B (2015) Recent declines and range changes of orchids in Western Europe (France, Belgium and Luxembourg). Biol. Cons. 190:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature 302:422–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1985) The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: Experimental studies with a montane herb. Oecologia 67(1):121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weakley AS, Ludwig JC, Townsend JF (2012) Flora of Virginia. BRIT Press, Fort Worth, p 1554

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z-Q, Li Q-J (2008) Autonomous selfing provides reproductive assurance in an alpine ginger Roscoea schneideriana (Zingiberaceae). Ann Bot 102:531–538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to USFWS for funding this research, J. Applegate and R. Floyd for site access and field accommodation, D. Waller and S. Droege for arthropod identification assistance, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA

    Lisa Horth

Authors
  1. Lisa Horth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LH conceived, designed and executed this study and wrote the manuscript. No other person is entitled to authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Horth.

Additional information

Communicated by Siegy Krauss.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horth, L. Understanding the impact of plant–arthropod interactions, pollination, and canopy light on the rare orchid, small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides). Plant Ecol 220, 563–576 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00936-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00936-x

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Endangered species
  • Inbreeding
  • Istoria
  • Orchid
  • Plant–insect interactions
  • Small population