Plant Ecology

, Volume 219, Issue 6, pp 705–717 | Cite as

Extreme drought alters growth and interactions with exotic grasses, but not survival, for a California annual forb

  • Diane M. Thomson
  • Jonas W. Kwok
  • Emily L. Schultz


Climate change will not only alter mean conditions, but increase the frequency and intensity of extreme events such as severe droughts. Yet the consequences of extreme drought for plant demography are poorly understood. We compared phenology, demographic rates and effects of competition with exotic grasses for the California annual forb Phacelia distans between a year with slightly below average precipitation (2011–2012) and one in extreme drought (2012–2013). We also contrasted these demographic responses with changes in seedling emergence rates and cover in the annual plant community. Early Phacelia mortality actually fell in the extreme drought year, as low October rainfall shifted germination to cooler conditions in November. Survival from mid December to flowering did not change between years. In contrast to expectations, competition with early-emerging exotic annual grasses did not reduce Phacelia spring survival in 2012–2013. A shorter window for fall germination that reduced priority effects may explain this result. Yet the 2012–2013 growing season ended a month earlier than in 2011–2012, significantly reducing Phacelia size at flowering and inflorescence production. Community seedling emergence and cover changed only weakly between the 2 years. Our results demonstrate the importance of within season precipitation patterns in determining whether a climatically extreme year will lead to extreme ecological outcomes. This work also illustrates how annual plant drought responses depend critically on germination behavior and phenology. An important future question is whether seed banks can sustain native forb population persistence through an extended drought with multiple years of low or failed reproduction.


Annual grassland Competition Demography Drought Exotic Precipitation 



We thank Lauren Cole for assistance collecting data in 2011–2012, and the editor and several anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments on the MS. This work was partially supported by NSF Award #0950106.


  1. Andrello M, Bizoux JP, Barbet-Massin M, Gaudeul M, Nicolè F, Till-Bottraud I (2012) Effects of management regimes and extreme climatic events on plant population viability in Eryngium alpinum. Biol Conserv 147:99–106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15144–15148. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley YM, Ramula S, Blomberg SP, Burns JH, Crone EE, Ehrlén J, Knight TM, Pichancourt JB, Quested H, Wardle GM (2010) Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. Ecol Lett 13:1182–1197. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleland EE, Esch E, McKinney J (2015) Priority effects vary with species identity and origin in an experiment varying the timing of seed arrival. Oikos 124:33–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Copeland SM, Harrison SP, Latimer AM, Damschen EI, Eskelinen AM, Fernandez-Going B, Spasojevic MJ, Anacker BL, Thorne JH (2016) Ecological effects of extreme drought on Californian herbaceous plant communities. Ecol Monogr 86:295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boeck HJ, Dreesen FE, Janssens IA, Nijs I (2011) Whole-system responses of experimental plant communities to climate extremes imposed in different seasons. New Phytol 189:806–817. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Diez JM, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grosholz ED, Olden JD, Sorte CJB, Blumenthal DM, Bradley BA, Early R, Ibáñez I, Jones SJ, Lawler JJ, Miller LP (2012) Will extreme climatic events facilitate biological invasions? Front Ecol Environ 10:249–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diffenbaugh NS, Swain DL, Touma D (2015) Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:3931–3936. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fay PA, Kaufman DM, Nippert JB, Carlisle JD, Harper CW (2008) Changes in grassland ecosystem function due to extreme rainfall events: implications for responses to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 14:1600–1608. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felton AJ, Smith MD (2017) Integrating plant responses to climate extremes from individual to ecosystem levels. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Going BM, Anacker BL, Harrison SP (2015) Temporal variability in California grasslands: soil type and species functional traits mediate response to precipitation. Ecology 93:2104–2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gioria M, Pyšek P, Osborne BA (2016) Timing is everything: does early and late germination favor invasions by herbaceous alien plants? J Plant Ecol. Google Scholar
  13. Gleason KE, Bradford JB, Bottero A, D’amato AW, Fraver S, Palik BJ, Battaglia MA, Iverson L, Kenefic L, Kern CC (2017) Competition amplifies drought stress in forests across broad climatic and compositional gradients. Ecosphere 8:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin D, Anchukaitis KJ (2014) How unusual is the 2012–2014 California drought? Geophys Res Lett 41:9017–9023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison SP, Gornish ES, Copeland S (2015) Climate-driven diversity loss in a grassland community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Google Scholar
  16. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter E, Turner JRG (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hovenden MJ, Newton PCD, Porter M (2017) Elevated CO2 and warming effects on grassland plant mortality are determined by the timing of rainfall. Ann Bot 119:1225–1233. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsu JS, Powell J, Adler PB (2012) Sensitivity of mean annual primary production to precipitation. Glob Chang Biol 18:2246–2255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C (2007) A new generation of events, not trends experiments. Front Ecol Environ 5:365–374.[365:ANGOCE]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karban R, Pezzola E (2017) Effects of a multi-year drought on a drought-adapted shrub, Artemisia tridentata. Plant Ecol 218:547–554. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimball S, Angert AL, Huxman TE, Venable DL (2010) Contemporary climate change in the Sonoran Desert favors cold-adapted species. Glob Chang Biol 16:1555–1565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–484. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Knapp AK, Ciais P, Smith MD (2017) Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–productivity relationships: implications for climate change. New Phytol 214:41–47. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Larios L, Aicher RJ, Suding KN (2013) Effect of propagule pressure on recovery of a California grassland after an extreme disturbance. J Veg Sci 24:1043–1052. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine JM, Rees M (2004) Effects of temporal variability on rare plant persistence in annual systems. Am Nat 164:350–363. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Levine JM, Kathryn Mceachern A, Cowan C (2010) Do competitors modulate rare plant response to precipitation change? Ecology 91:130–140. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas RW, Forseth IN, Casper BB (2008) Using rainout shelters to evaluate climate change effects on the demography of Cryptantha flava. J Ecol 96:514–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone SL, Tulbure MG, Perez-Luque AJ, Assal TJ, Bremer LL, Drucker DP, Hillis V, Varela S, Goulden ML (2016) Drought resistance across California ecosystems: evaluating changes in carbon dynamics using satellite imagery. Ecosphere 7:1–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueller RC, Scudder CM, Porter ME, Talbot Trotter R, Gehring CA, Whitham TG (2005) Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J Ecol 93:1085–1093. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nguyen MA, Ortega AE, Nguyen KQ, Kimball S, Goulden ML, Funk JL (2016) Evolutionary responses of invasive grass species to variation in precipitation and soil nitrogen. J Ecol 104:979–986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niu S, Luo Y, Li D, Cao S, Xia J, Li J, Smith MD (2014) Plant growth and mortality under climatic extremes: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 98:13–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nogueira C, Bugalho MN, Pereira JS, Caldeira MC (2017) Extended autumn drought, but not nitrogen deposition, affects the diversity and productivity of a Mediterranean grassland. Environ Exp Bot 138:99–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ooi MKJ (2012) Seed bank persistence and climate change. Seed Sci Res 22:S53–S60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orsenigo S, Mondoni A, Rossi G, Abeli T (2014) Some like it hot and some like it cold, but not too much: plant responses to climate extremes. Plant Ecol 215:677–688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pitt MD, Heady HF (1978) Responses of annual vegetation to temperature and rainfall patterns in Northern California. Ecology 59:336–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poirier M, Durand JL, Volaire F (2012) Persistence and production of perennial grasses under water deficits and extreme temperatures: importance of intraspecific vs. interspecific variability. Glob Chang Biol 18:3632–3646. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polley HW, Briske DD, Morgan JA, Wolter K, Bailey DW, Brown JR (2013) Climate change and North American rangelands: trends, projections, and implications. Rangel Ecol Manag 66:493–511. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  39. Reyer CPO, Leuzinger S, Rammig A, Wolf A, Bartholomeus RP, Bonfante A, de Lorenzi F, Dury M, Gloning P, Abou Jaoudé R, Klein T, Kuster TM, Martins M, Niedrist G, Riccardi M, Wohlfahrt G, de Angelis P, de Dato G, François L, Menzel A, Pereira M (2013) A plant’s perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability. Glob Chang Biol 19:75–89. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rice KJ, Menke JW (2017) Competitive reversals and environment-dependent resource partitioning in Erodium. Oecolo 67:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robeson SM (2015) Revisiting the recent California drought as an extreme value. Geophys Res Lett 42:6771–6779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rysavy A, Seifan M, Sternberg M, Tielbörger K (2016) Neighbour effects on shrub seedling establishment override climate change impacts in a Mediterranean community. J Veg Sci 27:227–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandel B, Dangremond EM (2012) Climate change and the invasion of California by grasses. Glob Chang Biol 18:277–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Boucher VL, Burton RS, Cottingham KL, Goldwasser L, Gram WK, Kendall BE, Micheli F (2003) Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs. Ecol Appl 13:575–592.[0575:CSLDAR]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith MD (2011) The ecological role of climate extremes: current understanding and future prospects. J Ecol 99:651–655. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. St. Clair SB, Sudderth EA, Castanha C, Torn MS, Ackerly DD (2009) Plant responsiveness to variation in precipitation and nitrogen is consistent across the compositional diversity of a California annual grassland. J Veg Sci 20:860–870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stuble KL, Zefferman EP, Wolf KM, Vaughn KJ, Young TP (2017) Outside the envelope: rare events disrupt the relationship between climate factors and species interactions. Ecology 98:1623–1630. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Suttle KB, Thomsen MA, Power ME (2007) Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 315:640–642. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Swain DL, Tsiang M, Haguen M, Sing D, Charland A, Rajaratnam B, Diffenbaugh NS (2014) The extraordinary California drought of 2013-2014: character, context and the role of climate change. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:S3–S7Google Scholar
  50. Thomson DM, Cruz-de Hoyos R, Cummings K, Schultz EL (2016) Why are native annual abundances low in invaded grasslands? Testing the effects of competition and seed limitation. Plant Ecol 217:431–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomson DM, King RA, Schultz EL (2017) Between invaders and a risky place: exotic grasses alter demographic tradeoffs of native forb germination timing. Ecosphere 8:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thorne JH, Boynton RM, Flint LE, Flint A (2015) The magnitude and spatial patterns of historical and future hydrologic change in California’ s watersheds. Ecosphere 6:1–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Valliere JM, Irvine IC, Santiago L, Allen EB (2017) High N, dry: experimental nitrogen deposition exacerbates native shrub loss and nonnative plant invasion during extreme drought. Glob Chang Biol 23:4333–4345. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. van Mantgem PJ, Nesmith JCB, Keifer M, Knapp EE, Flint A, Flint L (2013) Climatic stress increases forest fire severity across the western United States. Ecol Lett 16:1151–1156. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Young DJN, Stevens JT, Earles JM, Moore J, Ellis A, Jirka AL, Latimer AM (2017) Long-term climate and competition explain forest mortality patterns under extreme drought. Ecol Lett 20:78–86. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.W. M. Keck Science DepartmentClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations