Salt and waterlogging stress impacts on seed germination and early seedling growth of selected endemic plant species from Western Australia

Article

Abstract

Six perennial species endemic to South West Western Australia (Acacia trulliformis, Austrostipa geoffreyi, Banksia oligantha, B. mucronulata, Hakea tuberculata and Orthrosanthus muelleri) were screened for salt tolerance and recovery during seed germination. Growth and survival of 6-month old seedlings of these six plus a further vegetatively propagated species (Myoporum turbinatum) were subsequently examined in response to salt and waterlogging application. Water uptake under elevated saline conditions (200 and 400 mM NaCl) was slow, but not restrictive to germination. Moreover, a large proportion of seeds that were unable to germinate under saline conditions recovered after being transferred to non-saline conditions. Germination, growth and survival varied with species and the salt concentration used. Increasing salt concentrations tended to increase time to germination. Germination of Acacia trulliformis seeds declined exponentially with increasing salinity, and seedlings suffered reduced growth under saline and non-saline waterlogging. Austrostipa geoffreyi seeds were sensitive to saline treatments but seedlings were highly tolerant of both saline and/or waterlogged conditions. Germination of the three proteaceous species declined significantly under highly saline conditions (400 mM NaCl) with seedlings of the two Banksia species not surviving any treatment with the exception of non-saline waterlogging. Seedlings of H. tuberculata were more resilient to treatment conditions. Orthrosanthus muelleri was sensitive to salt stress during germination but was highly resistant to waterlogging, both saline and non-saline. This study provides an insight into the response and resilience of components of the vegetation understorey of saline-affected regions of Western Australia not usually evaluated allowing for more informed restoration.

Keywords

Germination Salinity Waterlogging Seedling growth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Ms. Susanne Schreck and Mr. Brian Taylor for technical assistant and help with design of glasshouse pot trials and Dr. Matthew Williams, biometrician, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, for statistical analysis. This study was supported by an Australian Government National Heritage Trust Grant (Project#023191).

References

  1. Ayers AD (1952) Seed germination as affected by soil moisture and salinity. Agron J 44:82–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett-Lennard EG (1986) Effects of waterlogging on the growth and NaCl uptake of vascular plants under saline conditions. Reclam Reveg Res 5:245–261Google Scholar
  3. Barrett-Lennard EG (2002) Restoration of saline land through revegetation. Agr Water Manag 53:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2014) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell DT (1999) Australian trees for the rehabilitation of waterlogged and salinity-damaged landscapes. Aust J Bot 47:697–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell DT, Plummer JA, Taylor SK (1993) Seed germination ecology in southwestern Western Australia. Bot Rev 59:25–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bewley DJ, Black M (1994) Seeds physiology of development and germination, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane A, Yates CJ, Hoyle GL, Nicotra AB (2015) Will among-population variation in seed traits improve the chance of species persistence under climate change? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig GF, Bell DT, Atkins CA (1990) Response to salt and waterlogging stress of ten taxa of Acacia selected from naturally saline areas of Western Australia. Aust J Bot 38:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delgado Fernández IC, Giménez Luque E, Gómez Mercado F, Pedrosa W (2016) Influence of temperature and salinity on the germination of Limonium tabernense Erben from Tabernas Desert (Almería, SE Spain). Flora 218:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Lakany MH, Luard EJ (1982) Comparative salt tolerance of selected Casuarina species. Aust For Res 13:11–20Google Scholar
  12. Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1980) Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. In: Hebblethwaite PD (ed) Seed production. Butterworths, London, pp 605–635Google Scholar
  13. Epstein E, Norlyn JD, Rush DW, Kingsbur RW, Kelley DB, Cunningham GA, Wrona AF (1980) Saline culture of crops—a genetic approach. Science 210:399–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Houle G, Morel L, Reynolds CE, Siegel J (2001) The effect of salinity on different developmental stages of an endemic annual plant, Aster laurentianus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 88:62–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Keiffer C, Ungar I (1997) The effect of extended exposure to hypersaline conditions on the germination of five inland halophyte species. Am J Bot 84:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keighery G, Halse S, McKenzie N, Gibson N, Burbidge A, Gomboso J (2000) Salinity: driving the catastrophic collapse of our ecosystems. B. Commun Biodivers Netw 6:29–30Google Scholar
  17. Khan MA, Bilquees G (2006) Halophyte seed germination. In: Khan MA, Weber DJ (eds) Ecophysiology of high salinity tolerant plants. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan MA, Gulzar S (2003) Light, salinity, and temperature effects on the seed germination of perennial grasses. Am J Bot 90:131–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan M, Ungar I (1997) Effects of thermoperiod on recovery of seed germination of halophytes from saline conditions. Am J Bot 84:279–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan MA, Ungar IA (1999) Effect of salinity on seed germination of Triglochin maritima under various temperature regimes. Great Basin Nat 592:144–150Google Scholar
  21. Khan MA, Gul B, Weber DJ (2001) Germination of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda moquinii under high salinity stress. Aust J Bot 49:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ladiges PY, Kelso A (1977) The comparative effects of waterlogging on two populations of Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. and one population of E. ovata Labill. Aust J Bot 25:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladiges PY, Foord PC, Willis RJ (1981) Salinity and waterlogging tolerance of some populations of Melalecua ericifolia Smith. Aust J Ecol 6:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambers H (2003) Dryland salinity: a key environmental issue in southern Australia. Plant Soil.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000003909.80658.d8 Google Scholar
  25. Lambers H, Ahmedi I, Berkowitz O, Dunne C, Finnegan PM, Hardy GE, Jost R, Laliberté E, Pearse SJ, Teste FP (2013) Phosphorus nutrition of phosphorus-sensitive Australian native plants: threats to plant communities in a global biodiversity hotspot. Cons Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot010 Google Scholar
  26. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. In: Water, radiation, salt and other stresses. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcar NE, Crawford DF, Saunders A, Matheson AC, Arnold RA (2002) Genetic variation among and within provenances and families of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill and E. globulus Labill. subsp. globulus seedlings in response to salinity and waterlogging. Forest Ecol Manag 162:231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer AM, Poljakoff-Mayber A (1989) The germination of seeds, 4th edn. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. McFarlane DJ, Williamson DR (2002) An overview of water logging and salinity in southwestern Australia as related to the “Ucarro” experimental catchment. Agr Water Manag 53:5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mead R (1988) The design of experiments: statistical principles for practical application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore GA, McFarlane DJ (1998) Waterlogging. In: Moore G (ed) Soil Guide. A handbook for understanding and managing agricultural soils. Agriculture Western Australia, Perth, pp 94–108Google Scholar
  32. Myers BA, Couper DI (1989) Effects of temperature and salinity on the germination of Puccinellia ciliata (Bor) cv. Menemen. Aust J Agr Res 40:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nikham SR, McComb J (2000) Salt tolerance screening of selected Australian woody species – a review. For Ecol Manag 139:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble CL, Rogers ME (1994) Response of temperate forage legumes to waterlogging and salinity. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 473–496Google Scholar
  35. Pearce-Pinto GVN, van der Moezel PG, Bell DT (1990) Seed germination under salinity stress in Western Australia species of Eucalyptus. Seed Sci Technol 18:113–118Google Scholar
  36. Rehman S, Harris PJC, Bourne WF, Wilkin J (1996) The effect of sodium chloride on germination and the potassium and calcium contents of Acacia seeds. Seed Sci Technol 25:45–57Google Scholar
  37. Rozema J (1975) The influence of salinity, inundation and temperature on the germination of some halophytes and non-halophytes. Oecol Plant 10:314–353Google Scholar
  38. Salinity Strategy Council (2000) Natural resource management in Western Australia: the salinity strategy. Government of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  39. Tlig T, Gorai M, Neffati M (2008) Germination responses of Diplotaxis harra to temperature and salinity. Flora 203:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ungar IA (1978) Halophyte seed germination. Bot Rev 44:777–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ungar IA (1995) Seed germination and seed-bank ecology in halophytes. In: Kigel J, Galili G (eds) Seed development and germination. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 599–628Google Scholar
  42. van der Moezel PG, Bell DT (1987a) Comparative seedling salt tolerance of several Eucalyptus and Melaleuca species from Western Australia. Aust For Res 17:151–158Google Scholar
  43. van der Moezel PG, Bell DT (1987b) The effect of salinity on the germination of some Western Australian Eucalyptus and Melaleuca species. Seed Sci Technol 15:239–246Google Scholar
  44. van der Moezel PG, Watson LE, Pearce-Pinto GVN, Bell DT (1988) The response of six Eucalyptus species and Casuarina obesa to the combined effect of salinity and waterlogging. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van der Moezel PG, Pearce-Pinto GVN, Bell DT (1991) Screening for salt and waterlogging tolerance in Eucalyptus and Melaleuca species. For Ecol Manag 40:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zedler JB, Paling E, McComb A (1990) Differential responses to salinity help explain the replacement of native Juncus kraussii by Typha orientalis in Western Australian salt marshes. Aust J Ecol 15:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Science and ConservationBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations