Plant Ecology

, Volume 218, Issue 3, pp 305–316 | Cite as

Regional- and watershed-scale analysis of red spruce habitat in the southeastern United States: implications for future restoration efforts

  • Jonathan A. Walter
  • J. C. Neblett
  • J. W. Atkins
  • H. E. Epstein
Article

Abstract

Red spruce (Picea rubens) is an evergreen tree with a range from Canada to North Carolina that provides habitat for multiple rare, endemic species. Red spruce-dominated forests once covered over 600,000 ha in the southeastern US, yet currently occupy a small fraction of their historical range due largely to logging that began in the nineteenth century. To combat this loss, restoration groups have emerged to actively improve the health and areal extent of red spruce. This study was conducted to (1) predict how suitable habitat for red spruce in the southeastern US is expected to change by the year 2100 in response to increasing global temperatures and (2) illustrate how these predictions can be used, in concert with local-scale information, to support efforts to restore red spruce in this region. Red spruce currently occupies a small fraction of the area indicated by our model to be suitable. The area of habitat supportive of red spruce was projected to decline from present day to the year 2100, but the magnitude of this decline depended on the level of carbon emissions, and there was considerable variability between climate models. In our case-study watershed, suitability for red spruce is predicted to decline by 2100, but may still support red spruce under optimistic to moderate emissions scenarios. At this scale, restoration strategies should also take into account locally varying conditions such as the current distribution of red spruce and competitive shrubs that may inhibit growth.

Keywords

Picea rubens Climate change Pedomemory Restoration 

Supplementary material

11258_2016_687_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (375 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 374 kb)

References

  1. Alexander JD, Donnelly JR, Shane JB (1995) Photosynthetic and transpirational responses of red spruce understory trees to light and temperature. Tree Physiol 15:393–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins JW, Epstein HE, Welsch DL (2015) Vegetation and elevation influence the timing and magnitude of soil CO2 efflux in a humid, topographically complex watershed. Biogeosciences 12:2975–2994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin HI (1934) Germination of red spruce. Plant Physiol 9:491–532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Beane NR, Rentch JS (2015) Using known occurrences to model suitable habitat for a rare forest type in West Virginia under select climate change scenarios. Ecol Restor 33:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry ZC, Smith WK (2012) Cloud pattern and water relations in Picea rubens and Abies fraseri, Southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Agric For Meteorol 162:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown MJ, Vogt JT (2015) North Carolina’s forests, 2015. Resource bulletin SRS-205. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley C (2014) Central Appalachian Spruce Restoration Initiative. http://www.restoreredspruce.org. Accessed 13 April 2014
  8. Byers EA, Vanderhorst JP, Streets BP (2010) Classification and conservation assessment of upland red spruce communities in West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources SectionGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavallin N, Vasseur L (2009) Red spruce forest regeneration dynamics across a gradient from Acadian forest to old field in Greenwich, Prince Edward Island National Park, Canada. Plant Ecol 201:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clinton BD, Vose JM (1996) Effects of Rhododendron maximum L. on Acer Rubrum L. seedling establishment. Castanea 61:38–45Google Scholar
  11. Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich H, Fischer E, Gerlitz L, Wehberg J, Wichmann V, Böhner J (2015) System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geosci Model Dev 8:1991–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day ME (2000) Influence of temperature and leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit on net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in red spruce (Picea rubens). Tree Physiol 20:57–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dibble AC, Brissette JC, Hunter ML Jr (1999) Putting community data to work: some understory plants indicate red spruce regeneration habitat. For Ecol Manag 114:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumais D, Prevost M (2007) Management for red spruce conservation in Quebec: the importance of some physiological and ecological characteristics—a review. For Chron 83:378–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fincher J, Alscher RG (1992) The effect of long-term ozone exposure on injury in seedlings of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). N Phytol 120:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortney RH (1975) A vegetation survey of Canaan Valley, West Virginia. Doctoral Dissertation, West Virginia University, Mortantown, West VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Fridley J (2009) Downscaling climate over complex terrain: high finescale (<1000 m) spatial variation of near-ground temperatures in a montane forested landscape (Great Smoky Mountains). J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:1033–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffith DM, Widmann RH (2003) Forest statistics for West Virginia, 1989 and 2000. USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory Analysis Unit, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, p 119Google Scholar
  19. Hamburg SP, Cogbill CV (1988) Historical decline of red spruce populations and climatic warming. Nature 331:428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hiltz A (2012) Logging the Virgin Forests of West Virginia. http://www.patc.us/history/archive/virg_fst.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2014
  22. Horton JL, Clinton BD, Walker JF, Beier CM, Nilsen ET (2009) Variations in soil and forest floor characteristics along gradients of ericaceous, evergreen shrub cover in the Southern Appalachians. Castanea 74:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houle D, Richard PJH, Ndzangou SO, Richer-Lafleche M (2012) Compositional vegetation changes and increased red spruce abundance during the Little Ice Age in a sugar maple forest of north-eastern North America. Plant Ecol 213:1027–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes JW, Bechtel DA (1997) Effect of distance from forest edge on regeneration of red spruce and balsam fir in clearcuts. Can J For Res 27:2088–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Projections of future changes in climate, IPCC fifth assessment report: climate change 2013. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.UnQEyxArwqQ. Accessed 13 Oct 2013
  26. Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M (2008) Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. For Ecol Manag 254:390–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koo KA, Madden M, Patten BC (2014) Projection of red spruce (Picea rubens Sargent) habitat suitability and distribution in the Southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Ecol Model 293:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koo KA, Patten BC, Madden M (2015) Predicting effects of climate change on habitat suitability of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) in the Southern Appalachian mountains of the USA: understanding complex systems mechanisms through modeling. Forests 6:1208–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kosiba AM, Shaberg PG, Hawley GJ, Hansen CF (2013) Quantifying the legacy of foliar winter injury on woody aboveground carbon sequestration of red spruce trees. For Ecol Manag 302:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis RL (1998) Transforming the Appalachian countryside: railroads, deforestation, and social change in West Virginia, 1880–1920. The University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Madron JM (2013) Reforestation of red spruce (Picea rubens) on the Cheat Mountain Range, West Virginia. Master of Science Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  32. MDA (2004) Landsat GeoCover TM 1990 Edition Mosaics Tiles N-17-35 and N-16-35. USGS, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  33. Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque J-F, Matsumoto K, Montzka SA, Raper SCB, Riahi K, Thomson A, Velders GJM, van Vuuren DPP (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 109:213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nauman TW, Thompson JA, Teets SJ, Dilliplane TA, Bell JW, Connolly SJ, Liebermann HJ, Yoast KM (2015) Ghosts of the forest: mapping pedomemory to guide forest restoration. Geoderma 247:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niinemets U (2010) Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For Ecol Manag 260:1623–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nilsen ET, Walker JF, Miller OK, Semones SW, Lei TT, Clinton BD (1999) Inhibition of seedling survival under Rhododendron maximum (Ericaceae): Could allelopathy be a cause? Am J Bot 86:1597–1605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nilsen ET, Clinton BD, Lei TT, Miller OK, Semones SW, Walker JF (2001) Does Rhododendron maximum L. (Ericaceae) reduce the availability of resources above and belowground for canopy tree seedlings? Am Midl Nat 145:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nowacki G, Carr R, Van Dyck M (2010) The current status of red spruce in the Eastern United States: distribution, population trends, and environmental drivers. In: Rentch JS, Schuler TM (eds) Proceedings from the conference on the ecology and management of high-election forests in thecentral and southern Appalachian Mountains. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. GTR NRS-P-64, pp 140–162Google Scholar
  39. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 42:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips DL, Murdy WH (1985) Effects of rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum L.) on regeneration of Southern Appalachian hardwoods. For Sci 31:226–233Google Scholar
  41. Post E (2013) Ecology of climate change: the importance of biological interactions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Potter KM, Hargrove WW, Koch FH (2010) Predicting climate change extirpation risk for Central and Southern Appalachian forest tree species. In: Proceedings from the conference on the ecology and management of high-elevation forests in the Central and Southern Appalachians, p 179–189Google Scholar
  43. Prism Climate Group, Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering (NACSE, 2014). http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed Dec 2013
  44. Randall AG (1974) Seed dispersal into two spruce-fir clearcuts in eastern Maine. University of Maine Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station. Res Life Sci 21(8):15Google Scholar
  45. Rentch JS, Schuler TM, Ford WM, Nowacki GJ (2007) Red spruce stand dynamics, simulations, and restoration opportunities in the Central Appalachians. Restor Ecol 15:440–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rentch JS, Schuler TM, Nowacki GJ, Beane NR, Ford WM (2010) Canopy gap dynamics of second-growth red spruce-northern hardwood stands in West Virginia. For Ecol Manag 260:1921–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rentch JS, Ford WM, Schuler TS, Palmer J, Diggens CJ (2016) Release of suppressed red spruce using canopy gap creation—ecological restoration in the Central Appalachians. Nat Areas J 36:29–37. doi:10.3375/043.036.0108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stehn SE, Webster CR, Jenkins MA, Jose S (2011) High elevation ground-layer plant community composition across environmental gradients in spruce-fir forests. Ecol Res 26:1089–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sullivan J (1993) Abies fraseri, Picea rubens. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (2016, March). Fire Effects Information System [Online: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/picrub/introductory.html, http://www.fs.fed.us/database/plants/tree/abifra/introductory.html]
  50. Thomas-Van Gundy M, Strager M, Rentch JS (2012) Site characteristics of red spruce witness tree locations in the uplands of West Virginia, USA. J Torrey Bot Soc 139:391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. United States Geological Survey (2009) National elevation dataset. http://nationalmap.gov. Accessed 1 Oct 2013
  52. United States Geological Survey and West Virginia Statewide Addressing and Mapping Board (WVSAMB), West Virginia University GIS Technical Center (2005) High resolution orthoimages for the State of West Virginia in 2003, UTM Zone 17Google Scholar
  53. van Lear DH, Vandermast DB, Rivers CT, Baker TT, Hedman CW, Clinton BD, Waldrop TA (2002) American chestnut, rhododendron, and the future of Appalachian Cove Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 214–220Google Scholar
  54. Vann DR, Johnson AH, Casper BB (1994) Effect of elevated temperatures on carbon dioxide exchange in Picea rubens. Tree Physiol 14:1339–1349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Watterson IG, Bathols J, Heady C (2014) What influences the skill of climate models over the continents? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:689–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (2013) Red spruce (Picea rubens) cover in West Virginia. http://wvgis.wvu.edu/data/dataset.php?ID=455. Accessed 19 Sep 2013
  57. White PS, Cogbill CV (1992) Spruce-fir forests of eastern North America. In: Ecology and decline of red spruce in the eastern United States. Springer, New York, p 3–39Google Scholar
  58. Young TP, Chase JM, Huddleston RT (2001) Community succession and assembly comparing, contrasting, and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecol Restor 19:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Kansas Biological SurveyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations