Weak effects on plant diversity of two invasive Impatiens species

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the effect of the invasion of the two congeneric species Impatiens glandulifera and Impatiens parviflora on species richness and composition across a wide range of communities in North-western Germany. We applied a space-for-time substitution approach, comparing invaded plots with adjacent, environmentally similar uninvaded plots, based on the assumption that the latter represent the situation prior to an invasion. Even though the dominance of the invasive species resulted in a lower Shannon diversity in the invaded plots, species richness was not (I. parviflora) or only weakly (I. glandulifera) reduced. Also the community composition of the invaded sites was only marginally different. Invaded and uninvaded plots in general had similar habitat conditions, but both Impatiens species occurred in slightly shadier sites compared to the uninvaded areas, and the plots invaded by I. parviflora tended to have higher nutrient concentrations. These results suggest that dense populations of invading species may often be found at particular microsites. The relatively low impact of Impatiens on the vegetation is most likely caused by the annual life strategy of the species: while I. glandulifera shows large fluctuations in numbers between years and has a later phenological development than most other species in its habitat, I. parviflora establishes preferably in dark and acidic, often disturbed woodlands where it competes with few other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Alvarez ME, Cushman JH (2002) Community-level consequences of a plant invasion: effects on three habitats in coastal California. Ecol Appl 12:1434–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews M, Maule HG, Raven JA, Mistry A (2005) Extension growth of Impatiens glandulifera at low irradiance: importance of nitrate and potassium accumulation. Ann Bot 95:641–648

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews M, Maule HG, Hodge S, Cherrill A, Raven JA (2009) Seed dormancy, nitrogen nutrition and shade acclimation of Impatiens glandulifera: implications for successful invasion of deciduous woodland. Plant Ecol Divers 2:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination. J Ecol 98:440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beerling DJ, Perrins JM (1993) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Impatiens roylei Walp.). J Ecol 81:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd edn. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, Ditomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chmura D, Sierka E (2006) Relationships between invasive plant Impatiens parviflora and species richness of forest floor vegetation. Pol J Ecol 54:417–428

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chmura D, Sierka E (2007) The invasibility of deciduous forest communities after disturbance: a case study of Carex brizoides and Impatiens parviflora invasion. For Ecol Manag 242:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coombe DE (1956) Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens parviflora DC. J Ecol 44:701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordes H, Feder J, Hellberg F, Metzing D, Wittig B (2006) Atlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen des Weser-Elbe-Gebietes. H. M. Hauschild GmbH, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovsky Z, Pyšek P (2014) Habitat requirements, short-term population dynamics and coexistence of native and invasive Impatiens species: a field study. Biol Invasions 16:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovsky Z, Pyšek P (2015) Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage. AoB Plants 7. doi:101093/aobpla/plv033

  14. Dassonville N, Vanderhoeven S, Vanparys V, Hayez M, Gruber W, Meerts P (2008) Impacts of alien invasive plants on soil nutrients are correlated with initial site conditions in NW Europe. Oecologia 157:131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Del Fabbro C, Güsewell S, Prati D (2014) Allelopathic effects of three plant invaders on germination of native species: a field study. Biol Invasions 16:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doobe L (2015) Invasive knotweed Fallopia japonica and its impact on phytodiversity in Bremen. Bachelor thesis, University of Bremen

  17. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulissen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed. Scripta Geobot 18:1–248

  19. Godefroid S, Koedam N (2010) Comparative ecology and coexistence of introduced and native congeneric forest herbs: Impatiens parviflora and I noli-tangere. Plant Ecol Evol 143:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruntman M, Pehl AK, Joshi S, Tielbörger K (2014) Competitive dominance of the invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera: using competitive effect and response with a vigorous neighbour. Biol Invasions 16:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruntman M, Zieger S, Tielbörger K (2016) Invasive success and the evolution of enhanced weaponry. Oikos 125:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hejda M (2012) What is the impact of Impatiens parviflora on diversity and composition of herbal layer communities of temperate forests? PLoS One 7:e39571. doi:10.1371/journalpone0039571

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hejda M, Pyšek P (2006) What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biol Conserv 132:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hulme PE, Bremner ET (2006) Assessing the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal. J Appl Ecol 43:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasperek G (2004) Fluctuations in numbers of neophytes, especially Impatiens glandulifera, in permanent plots in a west German floodplain during 13 years. Neobiota 3:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (eds) (2002) BiolFlor—Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenr Vegetationsk, vol 38. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, pp. 1–334

  28. Koenies H, Glavač V (1979) Über die Konkurrenzfähigkeit des Indischen Springkrautes (Impatiens glandulifera) am Fuldaufer bei Kassel. Phillipia 4:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kowarik I (2010) Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa, 2nd edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  30. Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Łysik M (2008) Ten years of change in groundlayer vegetation of European beech forest in the protected area (Ojcow National Park, South Poland). Pol J Ecol 56:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  32. MacDougall AS, Turkington R (2005) Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86:42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  34. Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Jarošik V, Pergl J (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing the regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. J Appl Ecol 42:1042–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nehring S, Kowarik I, Rabitsch W, Essl F (2013) Naturschutzfachliche Invasivitätsbewertungen für in Deutschland wild lebende gebietsfremde Gefäßpflanzen. BfN-Skripten 352:1–202

    Google Scholar 

  36. Obidzinski T, Symonides E (2000) The influence of the groundlayer structure on the invasion of small balsam (Impatiens parviflora DC) to natural and degraded forests. Acta Soc Bot Polon 69:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) Vegan: community ecology package, R Package Version 20-1

  38. Pahl AT, Kollmann J, Mayer A, Haider S (2013) No evidence for local adaptation in an invasive alien plant: field and greenhouse experiments tracing a colonization sequence. Ann Bot 112:1921–1930

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pannek A, Ewald J, Diekmann M (2013) Resource-based determinants of range sizes of forest vascular plants in Germany. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:1019–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pyšek P, Prach K (1995) Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandulifera—a century of spreading reconstructed. Biol Conserv 74:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pyšek P, Pyšek A (1995) Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic. J Veg Sci 6:711–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pyšek P, Jarošik V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilá M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org

  44. Rusterholz H-P, Salamon J-A, Ruckli R, Baur B (2014) Effects of the annual invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera on the Collembola and Acari communities in a deciduous forest. Pedobiologia 57:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Skálová H, Jarosik V, Dvorackova S, Pyšek P (2013) Effect of intra- and interspecific competition on the performance of native and invasive species of Impatiens under varying levels of shade and moisture. PLoS One 8(5):e62842. doi:10.1371/journalpone0062842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Suchopar A (2014) Arbeitsanweisung: Bestimmung von Calcium, Kalium und Magnesium mittels Atomabsorptionsspektroskopie, Bestimmung von Phosphat mittels Fließinjektionsanalyse. AG Vegetationsökologie und Naturschutzbiologie, Universität Bremen, Bremen

  47. Tanner RA, Varia S, Eschen R, Wood S, Murphy ST, Gange AC (2013) Impacts of an invasive non-native annual weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on above- and below-ground invertebrate communities in the United Kingdom. PLoS One 8(6):e67271. doi:10.1371/journalpone0067271

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tickner DP, Angold PG, Gurnell AM, Mountford JO, Sparks T (2001) Hydrology as an influence on invasion: experimental investigations into competition between the alien Impatiens glandulifera and the native Urtica dioica in the UK. In: Brundu G, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  49. Trepl L (1984) Über Impatiens parviflora DC als Agriophyt in Mitteleuropa. Diss Bot 73:1–400

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vervoort A, Jacquemart A, LaNeuve L (2012) Habitat overlap of the invasive Impatiens parviflora DC with its congener I glandulifera L. Phytocoenologia 42:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vilá M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošik V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. TREE 16:454–459

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Josef Müller for his help with identifying some plant species and to Dörthe Wagner and Andreas Suchopar for their assistance with the processing and analysis of soil samples. Two reviewers and the managing editor made many helpful comments to an earlier draft of the paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Diekmann.

Additional information

Communicated by Jodi Price.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix Figures

Fig. 5. DCA ordination diagram of species in 50 plots invaded by Impatiens glandulifera and 50 adjacent plots that are not invaded. To avoid overlapping names, some species are given with “+.” Environmental variables were post hoc fitted to the ordination results and displayed as vectors if significant at p < 0.01. For ordination statistics, see Fig. 2a. Fig. 6. DCA ordination diagram of species in 30 plots invaded by Impatiens parviflora and 30 adjacent plots that are not invaded. To avoid overlapping names, some species are given with “+.” Environmental variables were post hoc fitted to the ordination results and displayed as vectors if significant at p<0.01. For ordination statistics, see Fig. 2b (PDF 44 kb)

Appendix Table 3

Vegetation table of 50 pairs of plots, invaded by Impatiens glandulifera (i) or uninvaded (u) by the species. The species are ordered by layers and within layers by frequency. Transformed Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scores of all species are given (XLSX 67 kb)

Appendix Table 4

Vegetation table of 30 pairs of plots, invaded by Impatiens parviflora (i) or uninvaded (u) by the species. The species (only field layer is shown) are ordered by frequency. Transformed Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scores of all species are given (XLSX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diekmann, M., Effertz, H., Baranowski, M. et al. Weak effects on plant diversity of two invasive Impatiens species. Plant Ecol 217, 1503–1514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0663-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Impatiens glandulifera
  • Impatiens parviflora
  • Nutrient availability
  • Space-for-time substitution
  • Species richness