Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 216, Issue 7, pp 999–1018 | Cite as

The lagg ecotone: an integrative part of bog ecosystems in North America

  • Étienne ParadisEmail author
  • Line Rochefort
  • Mélanie Langlois
Article

Abstract

Ecological gradients have always been a central theme of plant ecology. Yet, very little is known on the bog–lagg–mineral land gradient. Improved knowledge of this gradient is important to the understanding of wetland plant ecology and wetland delineation alike. In this study, the relation between vegetation composition and peat thickness is analysed in 20 raised bogs of eastern Canada using split moving window dissimilarity analysis. Four different transition types are identified: (1) an abrupt transition without an ecotonal community; (2) a narrow transition with a lagg-swamp ecotonal community (most common transition type); (3) a narrow transition with two ecotonal communities (a lagg-fen and a lagg-swamp); and (4) a broad transition with a large wetland adjacent to the bog. Laggs that could be defined as separate habitat (type 1) occured, on average, on peat soil over 30 cm thick (defined as > 30 % dry mass of organic matter), making the lagg an integral part of the peatland complex. Other unique features of the lagg are: (1) a very densely structured habitat where trees, shrubs, herbs and Sphagnum mosses are abundant; (2) soils characterised by relatively high contents of total nitrogen and total phosphorus, but a particularly low N:P ratio (8.7 ± 2.5); and (3) a relatively high water table, which fluctuates substantially (from −33 to +10 cm in site A; from −12 to +10 in site B).

Keywords

Transition Zonation Delineation Peatland Swamp 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this research was provided by the NSERC, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy of NB, and the Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association and its members. Personal grants to Étienne Paradis were provided by the FQRNT and EDS Institute. We are grateful to Phan Cat Tuong Le, Catherine Emond, Marie-Ève Gauthier, Maud Gauthier, Virginie Laberge, Flor de María Salvador Pérez and Torben Russo for assistance in the field. We thank members of PERG-UL and Olivia Bragg for comments on this study.

References

  1. Agnew ADQ, Wilson JB, Sykes MT (1993) A vegetation switch as the cause of a forest/mire ecotone in New Zealand. J Veg Sci 4:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amacher MC, Henderson RE, Breithaupt MD, Seale CL, LaBauve JM (1990) Unbuffered and buffered salt methods for exchangeable cations and effective cation-exchange capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1036–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen R, Rochefort L, Landry J (2011) La chimie des tourbières du Québec : une synthèse de 30 années de données. Nat Can 135:5–14Google Scholar
  4. Anderson DS, Davis RB (1997) The vegetation and its environments in Maine peatlands. Can J Bot 75:1785–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnon DI, Fratzke WE, Johnson CM (1942) Hydrogen ion concentration in relation to absorption of inorganic nutrients by higher plants. Plant Physiol 17:515–524PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Attrill MJ, Rundle SD (2002) Ecotone or ecocline: ecological boundaries in estuaries. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55:929–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedford B, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackwell I (1992) A hydrological study of the lagg zone of Clara Bog, County Offaly, Ireland. Dissertation, Imperial College, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaney S (2011) Nova Scotia wetland indicator plant list. http://www.gov.ns.ca/nse/wetland/indicator.plant.list.asp. Accessed 13 March 2013
  10. Boughton EA, Quintana-Ascencio AF, Menges ES, Boughton RK (2006) Association of ecotones with relative elevation and fire in an upland Florida landscape. J Veg Sci 17:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burley ST, Harper KA, Lundholm JT (2010) Vegetation composition, structure and soil properties across coastal forest–barren ecotones. Plant Ecol 211:279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camarero JJ, Gutierrez E, Fortin M (2006) Spatial patterns of plant richness across treeline ecotones in the Pyrenees reveal different locations for richness and tree cover boundaries. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang SC, Chu WK (1961) The fate of soluble phosphate applied to soils. J Soil Sci 12:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choesin D, Boerner REJ (2002) Vegetation boundary detection: a comparison of two approaches applied to field data. Plant Ecol 158:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway VM (1949) The bogs of central Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 19:173–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelius JM, Reynolds JF (1991) On determining the statistical significance of discontinuities within ordered ecological data. Ecology 72:2057–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Damman AWH (1986) Hydrology, development and biogeochemistry of ombrogenous peat bogs with special reference to nutrient relocation in a western Newfoundland bog. Can J Bot 64:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Damman AWH, Dowhan JJ (1981) Vegetation and habitat conditions in Western Head Bog, a southern Nova Scotian plateau bog. Can J Bot 59:1343–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Mello JWV, Barrón V, Torrent J (1998) Phosphorus and iron mobilization in flooded soils from Brazil. Soil Sci 163:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellenberg HH, Strutt GK (2009) Vegetation ecology of central Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed) (1993) Flora of North America North of Mexico. 12+ vols. New York and Oxford. http://www.efloras.org. Accessed 6 June 2012
  23. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis. A guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortin MJ, Drapeau P (1995) Delineation of ecological boundaries: comparison of approaches and significance tests. Oikos 72:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gore AJP (1983) Ecosystems of the world, 4B: mires, swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorham E (1950) Variation in some chemical conditions along the borders of a Carex lasiocarpa fen community. Oikos 2:217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennenberg KJ, Goetze D, Kouamé L, Orthmann B, Porembski S (2005) Border and ecotone detection by vegetation composition along forest-savanna transects in Ivory Coast. J Veg Sci 16:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinds HR (2000) The flora of New Brunswick: a manual for the identification of the vascular plants of New Brunswick. University of New Brunswick, FrederictonGoogle Scholar
  29. Howie SA (2013) Bogs and their laggs in coastal British Columbia, Canada: characteristics of topography, depth to water table, hydrochemistry, peat properties, and vegetation at the bog margin. Dissertation, Simon Fraser UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Howie SA, Tromp-van Meerveld I (2011) The essential role of the lagg in raised bog function and restoration: a review. Wetlands 31:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hufkens K, Scheunders P, Ceulemans R (2009) Ecotones in vegetation ecology: methodologies and definitions revisited. Ecol Res 24:977–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeglum JK, He F (1995) Pattern and vegetation–environment relationships in a boreal forested wetland in northeastern Ontario. Can J Bot 73:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joosten H, Clarke D (2002) Wise use of mires and peatlands—background and principles including a framework for decision-making. International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat SocietyGoogle Scholar
  34. Keddy PA (1983) Shoreline vegetation in Axe Lake, Ontario: effects of exposure on zonation patterns. Ecology 64:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leopold A (1933) Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. (Reprinted in 1986)Google Scholar
  37. Livingston BE (1903) The distribution of the upland societies of Ken country, Michigan. Bot Gaz 35:36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ludwig JA, Cornelius JM (1987) Locating discontinuities along ecological gradients. Ecology 68:448–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marie-Victorin Fr (1995) Flore laurentienne, 3rd edn. Presses de l’Université de Montréal, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  40. Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs du Québec (MDDEP) (2008) Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables, Note explicative sur la ligne naturelle des hautes eaux : la méthode botanique experte. http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/eau/rives/note-explic.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2013
  41. Newmaster SG, Harris AG, Kershaw LJ (1997) Wetland plants of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  42. Parkinson JA, Allen SE (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun Soil Sci Plan 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Payette S, Rochefort L (eds) (2001) Écologie des tourbières du Québec-Labrador. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  44. Pellerin S, Lagneau LA, Lavoie M, Larocque M (2009) Environmental factors explaining the vegetation patterns in a temperate peatland. C R Biol 332:720–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1992) Salt marsh plant zonation: the relative importance of competition and physical factors. Ecology 73:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson CJ (1985) Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands. Science 228:1424–1427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Risser PG (1993) Ecotones at local to regional scales from around the world. Ecol Appl 3:367–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Risser PG (1995) The status of the science examining ecotones. Bioscience 45:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2006) The biology of peatlands. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 10 March 2013
  51. Sjörs H (1948) Myrvegetation i Bergslagen (Mire vegetation in Bergslagen, Sweden). Acta Phytogeogr Suec 21:1–299Google Scholar
  52. Sjörs H (1950) On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in North Swedish mire waters. Oikos 2:241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tessier JT, Raynal DJ (2003) Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. J Appl Ecol 40:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Ecosystem Classification Working Group (TECWG) (2003) Our landscape heritage: the story of ecological land classification in New Brunswick ISBN: 1-55236-220-5. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy. CD-Rom document. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Fredericton. http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/natural_resources/ForestsCrownLands/content/ProtectedNaturalAreas/OurLandscapeHeritage.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2014
  55. Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of succession. Am Nat 125:827–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tiner RW (1999) Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation, classification, and mapping. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Traut BH (2005) The role of coastal ecotones: a case study of the salt marsh/upland transition zone in California. J Ecol 93:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van der Maarel E (1990) Ecotones and ecoclines are different. J Veg Sci 1:135–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verhoeven JTA, Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) Nitrogen- or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:494–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walker S, Wilson JB, Steel JB, Rapson GL, Smith B, King WM, Cottam YH (2003) Properties of ecotones: evidence from five ecotones objectively determined from a coastal vegetation gradient. J Veg Sci 14:579–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wheeler BD, Proctor MCF (2000) Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. J Ecol 88:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitehouse HE, Bayley SE (2005) Vegetation patterns and biodiversity of peatland plant communities surrounding mid-boreal wetland ponds in Alberta, Canada. Can J Bot 83:621–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Étienne Paradis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Line Rochefort
    • 1
  • Mélanie Langlois
    • 2
  1. 1.Département de phytologie, Centre d’études nordiquesUniversité LavalQuebecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Environmental ManagementUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations