Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple limitations to the persistence of Trollius europaeus in a fragmented agricultural landscape in the context of metapopulation theory

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The knowledge about determinants of species survival is fundamental in conservation. Beyond determinants affecting local population survival, metapopulation theory emphasises the importance of processes operating on larger spatial scales (e.g. dispersal). We studied dispersal capacity and requirements for seedling recruitment of the threatened fen grassland species Trollius europaeus in order to assess the species’ ability to persist under the current land use conditions in the study region, north-east Germany. We used a seed sowing experiment and simulated endozoochorous and hydrochorous dispersal in a field and a laboratory experiment. Germination success reflected the experimental reduction of vegetation complexity, but the germination and recruitment rate was overall low. Survival was followed 2008–2011 and was best on plots with an intact moss layer. Mollusc exclusion displayed no significant effect. Endozoochorous dispersal is possible, however, in only minor quantities. Hydrochorous dispersal is very limited and negligible for connecting distant patches. We found evidence for microsite limitation, remnant population dynamics and the existence of unoccupied but suitable habitat patches available for colonization in our study region. However, (re-)colonization events are probably very rare due to dispersal limitation stressing the need for artificial seed transfer within the scope of restoration projects. Therefore, large quantities of seed material should be used in combination with mowing and thorough litter removal but leaving the moss layer intact. Management should be continued for longer than just the introduction year. Our study contributes to the understanding of species dynamics in fragmented landscapes. In particular, it contributes to the conservation of T. europaeus as an indicator of species-rich fen meadows in its Central European range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39

  • Bonn S, Poschlod P (1998) Ausbreitungsbiologie der Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Quelle & Meyer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruelheide H, Scheidel U (1999) Slug herbivory as a limiting factor for the geographical range of Arnica montana. J Ecol 87:839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM (2000) Gaps and seedling colonization. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 375–395

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Levey DJ, Osenberg CW (2007) Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am Nat 170:128–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danvind M, Nilsson C (1997) Seed floating ability and distribution of alpine plants along a northern Swedish river. J Veg Sci 8:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diemer M, Oetiker K, Billeter R (2001) Abandonment alters community composition and canopy structure of Swiss calcareous fens. Appl Veg Sci 4:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • During HJ, van Tooren BF (1990) Bryophyte interactions with other plants. Bot J Linn Soc 104:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein RL, Donath TW (2005) Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familial pairs of floodplain species. J Ecol 93:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2003) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: a response to Freckleton & Watkinson. J Ecol 91:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O (1996) Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O (2002) Ontogenetic niche shifts and their implications for recruitment in three clonal Vaccinium shrubs: Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, and Vaccinium oxycoccos. Can J Bot 80:635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364

  • Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2002) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J Ecol 90:419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hunt R (1975) Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J Ecol 63:393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin M (1997) Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biol J Linn Soc 42:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84:1945–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchmough JD (2003) Effects of sward height, gap size, and slug grazing on emergence and establishment of Trollius europaeus (globeflower). Rest Ecol 11:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchmough JD, Gough J, Corr B (2000) Germination and dormancy in a wild collected ecotype of Trollius europaeus. Seed Sci Technol 28:549–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann G (1991) VDLUFA—Methodenbuch. Die Untersuchung von Böden. VDLUFA, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband BC, Barrett SCH (1996) A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J Ecol 84:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger N, Després L (1998) Obligate mutualism between Trollius europaeus and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies in the Alps. CR Acad Sci III-Vie 321:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Schrautzer J (1999) Consequences of abandonment for a regional fen flora and mechanisms of successional change. Appl Veg Sci 2:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimkowska A, van Diggelen R, Bakker JP, Grootjans AP (2007) Wet meadow restoration in Western Europe: a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of several techniques. Biol Conserv 140:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knevel IC, Bekker RM, Kunzmann D, Stadler M, Thompson K (2005) The LEDA Traitbase collecting and measuring standards of life-history traits of the NW European flora. University of Groningen, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke T (2011) The situation of Trollius europaeus L. (Ranunculaceae) in the north-east of Central Europe—history, current changes and conservation. Plant Divers Evol 129:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke T, Porembski S (2013) Variation in the reproductive performance of the Trollius-Chiastocheta mutualism at the edge of its range in north-east Germany. Oecologia 172:437–447

  • Linkola K (1935) Über die Dauer und Jahresklassenverhältnisse des Jugendstadiums bei einigen Wiesenstauden. Acta Forest Fenn 42:1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B, van Diggelen R, Jensen K (2006) Seed dispersal in fens. Appl Veg Sci 9:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P (1994) Germination ecology of the polycarpic perennials Primula veris and Trollius europaeus. Ecography 17:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RP (1986) ISTA Handbuch für die Tetrazoliumuntersuchung. Internationale Vereinigung für Saatgutprüfung, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2004) Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats in metapopulation studies using co-occurrence of species. Oikos 105:408–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2005) Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitations. Oecologia 145:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otsus M, Zobel M (2004) Moisture condition and the presence of bryophytes determine fescue species abundance in a dry calcareous grassland. Oecologia 138:293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozinga WA, Römermann C, Bekker RM, Prinzing A, Tamis WLM, Schaminée JHJ, Hennekens SM, Thompson K, Poschlod P, Kleyer M, Bakker JP, van Groenendael JM (2009) Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. Ecol Lett 12:66–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O (1989) The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia 78:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Miao SL (1992) Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conserv Biol 6:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasran L, Vogt K, Jensen K (2007) Effects of litter removal and mowing on germination and establishment of two fen-grassland species along a productivity gradient. Folia Geobot 42:271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. L. Reeve, Ashford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruprecht E, Donath TW, Otte A, Eckstein RL (2008) Chemical effects of a dominant grass on seed germination of four familial pairs of dry grassland species. Seed Sci Res 18:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen AE (1986) Seed dispersal by adhesion. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:443–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (1980) Conservation biology: an evolutionary–ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Špačková I, Kotorová I, Lepš J (1998) Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Folia Geobot 33:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stampfli A, Zeiter M (1999) Plant species decline due to abandonment of meadows cannot easily be reversed by mowing. A case study from the southern Alps. J Veg Sci 10:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe C (1997) Rehwild—Biologie, Ökologie, Bewirtschaftung, 4th edn. Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, Goldberg DE (1999) Variation in the effects of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients. J Ecol 87:436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremlová K, Münzbergová Z (2007) Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology 88:965–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl L (1982) Principles of dispersal in higher plants, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Nilsson C (1999) The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 87:984–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AG, Clark GM (2000) Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank B. Eichler-Löbermann and G. Breuel (Agronomy, University of Rostock) for supporting the soil analysis, S. Adler (Rostock/Umeå) for help in statistical issues, H. Henker (Neukloster) and H.-D. Bringmann (Amt für Stadtgrün Rostock) for information about former and current land use practices and A. Schmidt (StALU Rostock) as well as the land owners for permission to work on the study sites. We sincerely thank the Rostock Zoological Garden for supporting the feeding experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Wismarsche Straße 8, 18051, Rostock, Germany

    Tristan Lemke, Anne Janßen & Stefan Porembski

  2. Stiftung Umwelt und Naturschutz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Mecklenburgstraße 7, 19053, Schwerin, Germany

    Anne Janßen

Authors
  1. Tristan Lemke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Janßen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Porembski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tristan Lemke.

Additional information

Communicated by Anne Bonis.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 91 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemke, T., Janßen, A. & Porembski, S. Multiple limitations to the persistence of Trollius europaeus in a fragmented agricultural landscape in the context of metapopulation theory. Plant Ecol 216, 319–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0439-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0439-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation