Plant Ecology

, Volume 215, Issue 2, pp 195–208 | Cite as

Postfire regeneration of resprouting mountain fynbos shrubs: differentiating obligate resprouters and facultative seeders

  • K. E. Marais
  • R. B. Pratt
  • S. M. Jacobs
  • A. L. Jacobsen
  • K. J. Esler
Article

Abstract

Plant species in Mediterranean-type climate regions have a diversity of traits that facilitate their persistence under a given fire regime. Obligate resprouters (OR) are dependent on resprouting to persist through a burn episode, as their seeds are killed by fire. Facultative seeders (FS) combine strategies by resprouting and recruiting new seedlings after fire. We hypothesised that these life history differences would lead to differential resprout success and we predicted that OR would be more successful than FS. We performed a 2-year study to assess resprout success of co-occurring Western Cape mountain fynbos FS and OR species, and to determine predictors of resprout success following a wildfire. All the FS species recruited seedlings postfire, whereas the OR did not. OR demonstrated near complete (99 %) survival after 2 years and all resprouted within 4 months postfire. In contrast, only 81 % of FS resprouted with only 65 % surviving 2 years postfire. Numerous factors were linked to resprout success: decreased lignotuber exposure and pre-fire vigour (number of pre-fire shoots) were significantly associated with postfire resprouting, while early resprouting (days to first resprout) and growth rate were significant predictors of post-resprout survival. The difference in resprout survival between the FS and OR may also be partially due to phylogenetic differences. These findings confirm the heterogeneity and complexity of postfire resprouting and support the distinction of OS and FS life history types.

Keywords

Facultative seeders Fire Mediterranean-type ecosystems Obligate resprouters Postfire succession Resprouting 

References

  1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) Ime4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2Google Scholar
  2. Bell TL, Ojeda F (1999) Underground starch storage in Erica species of the Cape Floristic region—differences between seeders and resprouters. New Phytol 144:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD (2000) Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 89:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol 16:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2003) The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. Int J Plant Sci 164:S103–S114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond WJ, van Wilgen BW (1996) Fire and plants. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond WJ, Vlok J, Viviers M (1984) Variation in seedling recruitment of cape proteaceae after fire. J Ecol 72:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen NL, Muller CH (1975) Relative importance of factors controlling germination and seedling survival in Adenostoma chaparral. Am Midl Nat 93:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ, Lamont BB, Ojeda F, Burrows GE, Enright NJ, Knox KJE (2013) Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire. New Phytol 197:19–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Arroyo MK, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in Mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:362–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowling RM, Kirkwood D, Midgley JJ, Pierce SM (1997) Invasion and persistence of bird-dispersed, subtropical thicket and forest species in fire-prone coastal fynbos. J Veg Sci 8:475–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crandall RM, Platt WJ (2012) Habitat and fire heterogeneity explain the co-occurrence of congeneric resprouter and reseeder Hypericum spp. along a Florida pine savanna ecocline. Plant Ecol 213:1643–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drewa PB, Platt WJ, Moser EB (2002) Fire effects on resprouting of shrubs in headwaters of southeastern longleaf pine savannas. Ecology 83:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Euston-Brown D, Botha S, Bond W (2004) Influence of fire severity on post-fire vegetation recovery on the Cape Peninsula. Draft final report for the Working for Water ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldblatt P, Manning JC (2000) Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. National Botanical Institute & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991) Comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 239Google Scholar
  17. Jones MB, Laude HM (1960) Relationships between sprouting in chamise and the physiological condition of the plant. J Range Manag 13:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keeley JE (2009) Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int J Wildland Fire 18:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keeley JE, Bond WJ (1997) Convergent seed germination in South African fynbos and Californian Chaparral. Plant Ecol 133:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Baer-Keeley M (2006) Demographic patterns of postfire regeneration in Mediterranean-climate shrublands of California. Ecol Monogr 76:235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeley JE, Bond WJ, Bradstock RA, Pausas JG, Rundel PW (2012) Fire in Mediterranean ecosystems; ecology, evolution and management. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Maitre DC, Jones CA, Forsyth GG (1992) Survival of eight woody sprouting species following an autumn fire in Swartboskloof, Cape Province, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 58:405–413Google Scholar
  23. Malanson GP, Trabaud L (1988) Vigour of post-fire resprouting by Quercus coccifera L. J Ecol 76:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manders PT, Richardson DM (1992) Colonization of Cape fynbos by forest species. For Ecol Manag 48:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manders PT, Richardson DM, Masson PH (1992) Is fynbos a stage in succession to forest? Analysis of perceived ecological distinction between two communities. In: van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, Kruger FJ, van Hensbergen HJ (eds) Fire in South African mountain fynbos: ecosystem, community and species response at swartboskloof. Springer, New York, pp 81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Midgley JJ (1996) Why the world’s vegetation is not totally dominated by resprouting plants: because resprouters are shorter than reseeders. Ecography 19:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milton SJ (2003) Vegetation survey. Paarl mountain nature reserve. Conservation Ecology Department, University of Stellenbosch, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  28. Moreira B, Tormo J, Pausas JG (2012) To resprout or not to resprout: factors driving intraspecific variability in sprouting. Oikos 121:1577–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno JM, Oechel WC (1991) Fire intensity and herbivory effects on post-fire resprouting of Adenostoma fasciculatum in southern California chaparral. Oecologia 85:429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moreno JM, Oechel WC (1993) Demography of Adenostoma fasciculatum after fires of different intensities in southern California chaparral. Oecologia 96:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds) (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paula S, Ojeda F (2006) Resistance of three co-occurring resprouter Erica species to highly frequent disturbance. Plant Ecol 183:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paula S, Ojeda F (2009) Belowground starch consumption after recurrent severe disturbance in three resprouter species of the genus Erica. Botany 87:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pérez B, Moreno JM (1998) Methods for quantifying fire severity in shrubland fires. Plant Ecol 139:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Hernandez J, Ewers FW, North GB, Davis SD (2012a) Allocation tradeoffs among Chaparral shrub seedlings with different life history types (Rhamnaceae). Am J Bot 99:1464–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Jacobs SM, Esler KJ (2012b) Xylem transport safety and efficiency differ among fynbos shrub life history types and between two sites differing in mean rainfall. Int J Plant Sci 173:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ramirez AR, Helms AM, Traugh CA, Tobin MF, Heffner MS, Davis SD (2014) Mortality of resprouting chaparral shrubs after a fire and during a record drought: physiological mechanisms and demographic consequences. Glob Chang Biol (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  39. Rebelo T (1995) Proteas. A field guide to the proteas of southern Africa. Fernwood Press, VlaebergGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2005) Is there a cost to resprouting? Seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in sprouting and nonsprouting Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). Am J Bot 92:404–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stohlgren TJ, Parsons DJ, Rundel PW (1984) Population structure of Adenostoma fasciculatum in mature stands of chamise chaparral in the southern Sierra Nevada, California. Oecologia 64:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Syphard AD, Franklin J, Keeley JE (2006) Simulating the effects of frequent fire on southern California coastal shrublands. Ecol Appl 16:1744–1756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Wilgen B (1974) A management plan for the Paarl mountain nature reserve. Nature Conservation Department (Conservation Ecology), University of Stellenbosch, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG (1992) Regeneration strategies in fynbos plants and their influence on the stability of community boundaries after fire. In: van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, Kruger FJ, van Hensbergen HJ (eds) Fire in South African mountain fynbos: ecosystem, community and species response at swartboskloof. Springer, New York, pp 54–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Wilgen BW, Forsyth GG, de Klerk H, Das S, Khuluse S, Schmitz P (2010) Fire management in Mediterranean-climate shrublands: a case study from the Cape fynbos, South Africa. J Appl Ecol 47:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verdú M, Pausas JG, Segarra-Moragues JG, Ojeda F (2007) Burning phylogenies: fire, molecular evolutionary rates, and diversification. Evolution 61:2195–2204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vesk PA, Westoby M (2004a) Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types worldwide. J Ecol 92:310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vesk PA, Westoby M (2004b) Funding the bud bank: a review of the costs of buds. Oikos 106:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vesk PA, Warton DI, Westoby M (2004) Sprouting by semi-arid plants: testing a dichotomy and predictive traits. Oikos 107:72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. West AG, Dawson TE, February EC, Midgley GF, Bond WJ, Aston TL (2012) Diverse functional responses to drought in a Mediterranean-type shrubland in South Africa. New Phytol 195:396–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitehouse CM (2002) Systematics of the genus Cliffortia L. [Rosaceae]. PhD Thesis, Department of Botany, University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  52. Yi T, Miller AJ, Wen J (2004) Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) in the Northern Hemisphere. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:861–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zucchini W (1992) “Genrain” rainfall simulation programme for South Africa. Applied Statistics and Decision Sciences Unit, University of Cape Town, RondeboschGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Marais
    • 1
  • R. B. Pratt
    • 2
  • S. M. Jacobs
    • 1
  • A. L. Jacobsen
    • 2
  • K. J. Esler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Conservation Ecology and EntomologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCalifornia State UniversityBakersfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations