Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 214, Issue 2, pp 243–254 | Cite as

Effects of experimental climate warming and associated soil drought on the competition between three highly invasive West European alien plant species and native counterparts

  • M. Verlinden
  • A. Van Kerkhove
  • I. Nijs
Article

Abstract

It is widely suggested that climate warming will increase the impact of biological invasions, yet, to date studies on the combined effect of these two global changes are scarce. Here, we study how climate warming and associated soil drought affect the competition between native and invasive alien plant species. Three highly invasive alien plant species in West Europe, each with a native competitor, were grown either together or in isolation at ambient and at elevated air temperature (+3 °C) in climate-controlled chambers. Equal amounts of water were added to all communities. Soil drought observed in the heated chambers did not induce severe stress in the plants. In two species pairs, Fallopia japonica (Houtt.)–Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Solidago gigantea Ait.–Epilobium hirsutum L. (alien invasive–native), the native species dominated in mixture, while the alien invasive species dominated in the third pair Senecio inaequidens DC.–Plantago lanceolata L. Warming did not modify the competitive balance in any of these pairs, in spite of enhancing the aboveground biomass of S. inaequidens and P. lanceolata and the greater photosynthetic rates in S. inaequidens. The results of this study cannot be extrapolated to all invasive or exotic species but may represent the possible future of three principle invaders and some of their key native counterparts. Future experiments are needed to identify response patterns of alien plants to climate warming more in general.

Keywords

Global warming Plant invasions Interspecific competition Highly invasive alien plant species Soil drought 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financed by the Belgian Science Policy (framed within the ALIEN IMPACT Project). We thank F. Kockelbergh for technical assistance.

Supplementary material

11258_2012_163_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (483 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 483 kb)
11258_2012_163_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (55 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 55 kb)

References

  1. Aguilera AG, Alpert P, Dukes JS, Harrington R (2010) Impacts of the invasive plant Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) on plant communities and ecosystem processes. Biol Invasions 12:1243–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beerling DJ, Huntly B, Bailey JP (1995) Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J Veg Sci 6:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berendse F, Möller F (2009) Effects of competition on root–shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift? Plant Ecol 201:557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg MP, Kiers ET, Driessen G et al (2010) Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Global Change Biol 16:587–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorkman O, Demmig B (1987) Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170:489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooker RW (2006) Plant–plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytol 171:271–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Boeck HJ, Lemmens CMHM, Bossuyt H et al (2006) How do climate warming and plant species richness affect water use in experimental grasslands? Plant Soil 288:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Boeck HJ, Lemmens CMHM, Zavalloni C et al (2008) Biomass production in experimental grasslands of different species richness during three years of climate warming. Biogeosciences 5:585–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dukes JS (2002) Comparison of the effect of elevated CO2 on an invasive species (Centaurea solstitialis) in monoculture and community settings. Plant Ecol 160:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14(4):135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ernst WHO (1998) Invasion, dispersal and ecology of the South African neophyte Senecio inaequidens in The Netherlands: from wool alien to railway and road alien. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 1(47):131–151Google Scholar
  12. Garcia-Serrano H, Sans FX, Escarré J (2007) Interspecific competition between alien and native congeneric species. Acta Oecol 31:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Serrano H, Caňo L, Escarré J, Fleck I, Sans FX (2009) Physiological comparison of alien Senecio inaequidens and S. pterophorus and native S. malacitanus: implications for invasion. Flora 204:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grime JP, Mackey JML (2002) The role of plasticity in resource capture by plants. Evol Ecol 16:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:534–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hely SEL, Roxburgh SH (2005) The interactive effects of elevated CO2, temperature and initial size on growth and competition between a native C3 and an invasive C3 grass. Plant Ecol 177:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hulme PE (2009) Relative roles of life-forms, land use and climate in recent dynamics of alien plant distributions in the British Isles. Weed Res 49:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs J, Sciengienka J, Menalled F (2006) Ecology and management of Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.]. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Invasive Species Technical Note 5:1–11Google Scholar
  20. Lin D, Xia J, Wan S (2010) Climate warming and biomass accumulation of terrestrial plants: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 188:187–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Llorens L, Peñuelas J, Estiarte M, Bruna P (2004) Contrasting growth changes in two dominant species of a Mediterranean shrubland submitted to experimental drought and warming. Ann Bot 94:843–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López-García MC, Maillet J (2005) Biological characteristics of an invasive South African species. Biol Invasions 7:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maron JL, Elmendorf SC, Vilà M (2007) Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum. Evolution 61:1912–1924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niu S, Wan S (2008) Warming changes plant competitive hierarchy in a temperate steppe in northern China. J Plant Ecol 1:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niu S, Li Z, Xia J, Han Y, Wu M, Wan S (2008) Climatic warming changes plant photosynthesis and its temperature dependence in a temperate steppe of northern China. Environ Exp Bot 63:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norby RJ, Luo YQ (2004) Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world. New Phytol 162:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poorter H, Navas ML (2003) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol 157:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pysek P, Richardson DM (2006) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–125Google Scholar
  29. Rawson HM (1992) Plant responses to temperature under conditions of elevated CO2. Aust J Bot 40:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM et al (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C (1994) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. Ecol Stud 100:49–70Google Scholar
  32. Sexton JP, McKay JK, Sala A (2002) Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol Appl 12:1652–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shamsi SRA, Whitehead FH (1974) Comparative ecophysiology of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrum salicaria L. 1. General biology, distribution and germination. J Ecol 62(1):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw MR, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Mooney HA, Field CB (2002) Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298:1987–1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siemens TJ, Blossey B (2007) An evaluation of mechanisms preventing growth and survival of two native species in invasive Bohemian knotweed (Fallopiax bohemica, Polygonaceae). Am J Bot 4:776–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P et al (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biol 11:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verlinden M, Nijs I (2010) Alien plant species favoured over congeneric natives under experimental warming in temperate Belgian climate. Biol Invasions 12(8):2777–2787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verloove F (2002) Ingeburgerde plantensoorten in Vlaanderen. Mededeling van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud 20, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  39. Vitousek PM, DAntonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand J Ecol 21(1):1–16Google Scholar
  40. Walther GR (2003) Plants in a warmer world. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Systemat 6:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE et al (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24(12):686–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weber E, Jakobs G (2005) Biological flora of central Europe: Solidago gigantea Aiton. Flora 200:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White TA, Campbell BD, Kemp PD, Hunt CL (2000) Sensitivity of three grassland communities to simulated extreme temperature and rainfall events. Global Change Biol 6:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willis SG, Hulme PE (2002) Does temperature limit the invasion of Impatiens glandulifera and Heracleum mantegazzianum in the UK? Funct Ecol 16:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wythers KR, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Bolstad PB (2005) Foliar respiration acclimation to temperature and temperature variable Q10 alter ecosystem carbon balance. Global Change Biol 11:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang LH, Rudolf VHW (2010) Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. Ecol Let 13:1–10Google Scholar
  47. Yordanov I, Velikova V, Tsonev T (2003) Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian J Plant Physiol Special Issue, 187–206Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group Plant and Vegetation Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium

Personalised recommendations