Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of mesofauna and decomposition environment on leaf decomposition in three forests in southeastern Brazil

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the effects of soil mesofauna and the litter decomposition environment (above and belowground) on leaf decomposition rates in three forest types in southeastern Brazil. To estimate decomposition experimentally, we used litterbags with a standard substrate in a full-factorial experimental design. We used model selection to compare three decomposition models and also to infer the importance of forest type, decomposition environment, mesofauna, and their interactions on the decomposition process. Rather than the frequently used simple and double-exponential models, the best model to describe our dataset was the exponential deceleration model, which assumed a single organic compartment with an exponential decrease of the decomposition rate. Decomposition was higher in the wet than in the seasonal forest, and the differences between forest types were stronger aboveground. Regarding litter decomposition environment, decomposition was predominantly higher below than aboveground, but the magnitude of this effect was higher in the seasonal than in wet forests. Mesofauna exclusion treatments had slower decomposition, except aboveground into the Semi-deciduous Forest, where the mesofauna presence did not affect decomposition. Furthermore, the effect of mesofauna was stronger in the wet forests and belowground. Overall, our results suggest that, in a regional scale, both decomposers activity and the positive effect of soil mesofauna in decomposition are constrained by abiotic factors, such as moisture conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair EC, Parton WJ, Delgrosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC (2008) Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Global Change Biol 14:2636–2660

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres E, Steltzer H, Simmons BL, Simpson RT, Steinweg JM, Wallenstein MD, Mellor N, Parton WJ, Moore JC, Wall DH (2009) Home field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol Biochem 41:606–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:634–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker B and R Development Core Team (2012) bbmle: tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. R package version 1.0.4.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bbmle

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanho CT, Oliveira AA (2008) Relative effects of litter quality, forest type and their interaction on leaf decomposition in southeastern Brazilian forests. J Trop Ecol 24:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusack D, Chou WW, Yang WH, Harmon ME, Silver WL, LIDET Team (2009) Controls on long-term root and leaf litter decomposition in neotropical forest. Global Change Biol 15:1339–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson ED, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48:53–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein HE, Burke IC, Lauenroth WK (2002) Regional patterns on decomposition and primary production rates in the US great plains. Ecology 83:320–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragoso C, Lavelle P (1992) Earthworm communities of tropical rain forests. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1397–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholz HL, Wedin DA, Smitherman SM, Harmon ME, Parton WJ (2000) Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Global Change Biol 6:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez G, Seastedt TR (2001) Soil fauna and soil litter decomposition in tropical and subalpine forests. Ecology 82:955–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon M, Nadelhoffer K, Blair J (1999) Measuring decomposition, nutrient turnover, and stores in plant litter. In: Robertson G, Bledsoe C, Coleman D, Sollins P (eds) Standard methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 202–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassal RS, Black TA, Novak MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z (2008) Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand. Global Change Biol 14:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H, Gessel SP, Bingham FT (1949) Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci 68:419–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CF, Herrera R (1981) Tropical rain forests: are nutrients really critical? Am Nat 117:167–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Blanchart E, Martin A, Martin S, Spain A, Toutain F, Barois I, Schafer R (1993) A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: applications to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25:130–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lousier JD, Parkson D (1976) Litter decomposition in a cool temperate deciduous forest. Can J Ecol 54:419–436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant Soil 115:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Jordan C (2002) Reciclaje de nutrientes. In: Kattan GH, Guariguata MR (eds) Ecologia y conservación de bosques neotropicales. Ediciones LUR, Cartago, pp 591–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul EA, Clark FE (1989) Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers JS et al (2009) Decomposition in tropical forests: a pan-tropical study of the effects of litter type, litter placement and mesofaunal exclusion across a precipitation gradient. J Ecol 97:801–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  • Rovira P, Rovira R (2010) Fitting litter decomposition datasets to mathematical curves: towards a generalized exponential approach. Geoderma 155:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira P, Kurz-Besson C, Coûteaux MM, Vallejo VR (2008) Changes in litter properties during decomposition: a study by differential thermogravimetry and scanning calorimetry. Soil Biol Biochem 40:172–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero PGC, Batalha MA, Pivello VR, Meirelles ST (2002) Soil-vegetation relationships in cerrado (Brazilian savanna) and semideciduous forest, southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecol 160:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salimon CI, Davidson EA, Victoria RL, Melo AWF (2004) CO2 flux from soil in pastures and forests in southwestern Amazonia. Global Change Biol 10:833–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt TR (1984) The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu Rev Entomol 29:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Bhattib JS, Chenc H, Harmond ME, Arpa PA (2011) Modelling above- and below-ground mass loss and N dynamics in wooden dowels (LIDET) placed across North and Central America biomes at the decadal time scale. Ecol Model 222:2276–2290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso HP (1992) Sistema fitogeográfico. In: Veloso HP (ed) Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira. Séries Manuais Técnicos em Geociências, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, pp 9–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Sanford RL Jr (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:137–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall DH, Bradford MA, ST Johnz MG et al (2008) Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Global Change Biol 14:2661–2677

  • Wieder RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support for the fieldwork provided by grant 1999/096355-0 from the São Paulo Research Foundation, as part of the BIOTA-FAPESP, the Biodiversity Virtual Institute Program, coordinated by Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues. The master’s degree scholarship for the first author was provided by CAPES (Coordination of the Improvement of High Level Personnel). We especially thank Kyle E. Harms for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and both the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camila T. Castanho.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castanho, C.T., Lorenzo, L. & de Oliveira, A.A. The importance of mesofauna and decomposition environment on leaf decomposition in three forests in southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecol 213, 1303–1313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0089-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0089-2

Keywords

Navigation