Skip to main content
Log in

Seed and microsite limitation in a late-successional old field: the effects of water, adults, litter, and small mammals on seeds and seedlings

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many plant communities are recruitment limited, which may occur because there are either too few seeds to fill available microsites, too few available microsites, or both. In a recruitment-limited, Minnesota, USA old field, we tested among these alternatives in a three-phase study. In phase 1, we estimated the production of late-successional forb and C4 grass seeds. In phase 2, we experimentally modified field establishment conditions with rainfall amendment, adult plant thinning, litter reduction, and small mammal exclusion. We then measured recruitment. On average, of the nearly 2,600 seeds produced m−2, only 164 seeds m−2 were present and living after overwintering, as measured by field and greenhouse germination. Furthermore, on average, only 9 of those 164 seeds m−2 germinated in the field, even under the relaxed establishment conditions of our four experimental treatments. Although adults of C4 grasses dominate the field, surprisingly few C4 grass seedlings germinated. To understand why, in phase 3, we added seed of the three dominant C4 grasses into the same plots the following year. Their ability to recruit into control plots compared with treated plots was relatively lower than for the ambiently recruited forbs from phase 2, suggesting that the competitively dominant C4 grasses have greater difficulty establishing in the extant community. Of the seeds that did germinate in the field in phases 2 and 3, all four experimental treatments significantly improved at least one stage of establishment, with the rainfall amendment having the greatest overall effect across species. In total, our results suggest that seed limitation was exacerbated by microsite limitation via multiple mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Kyriakidis P, Guan Q, Levine JM (2006) Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on coexistence of prairie grasses. PNAS 103:12793–12798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (1999) Rules for testing seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Stillwater, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker M, Pearson D, Maron J (2010) Small-mammal seed predation limits the recruitment and abundance of two perennial grassland forbs. Ecology 91(1):85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Archer S (1999) Shrub invasion of grassland: recruitment is continuous and not regulated by herbaceous biomass or density. Ecology 80(7):2385–2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Levey DJ, Osenberg CW (2007) Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am Nat 170(1):128–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1996) Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecol Monog 65:419–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards GR, Crawley MJ (1999) Rodent seed predation and seedling recruitment in mesic grassland. Oecologia 118(3):288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Tilman D (2005) Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunchgrass. Oecologia 143(4):598–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL (2001) Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: the role of propagule availability. Ecol Lett 4:530–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Dickson TL (2004) Grassland diversity and productivity: the interplay of resource availability and propagule pools. Ecology 85(6):1541–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Gross KL (1997) Partitioning the effect of plant biomass and litter on Andropogon gerardi in old-field succession. Ecology 78:2091–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Gross KL (1998) Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79:2593–2602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Tilman D (2003) Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland. J Ecol 91(6):999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Dickson TL, Murphy CA, Karel IS, Smith VH (2004) Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient. J Ecol 92:435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goergen E, Daehler CC (2002) Factors affecting seedling recruitment in an invasive grass (Pennisetum setaceum) and a native grass (Heteropogon contortus) in the Hawaiian Islands. Plant Ecol 161(2):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D, Werner PA (1983) The effects of size of opening in vegetation and litter cover on seedling establishment of goldenrods (Solidago spp). Oecologia 60:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graae BJ, Ejrnaes R, Lang SI, Meineri E, Ibarra PT, Bruun HH (2011) Strong microsite control of seedling recruitment in tundra. Oecologia 166(2):565–576. doi:10.1007/S00442-010-1878-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiling DA, Kichanan N (2002) Old-field seedling responses to insecticide, seed addition, and competition. Plant Ecol 159(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Curtis AV (1976) The interaction of drought and mineral nutrient stress in calcereous grassland. J Ecol 64(3):975–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL, Mittelbach GG, Reynolds HL (2005) Grassland invasibility and diversity: responses to nutrients, seed input, and disturbance. Ecology 86(2):476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houseman GR, Gross KL (2006) Does ecological filtering across a productivity gradient explain variation in species pool–richness relationships? Oikos 115(1):148–154. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14743.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (1994a) Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. J Ecol 82(3):645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (1994b) Seedling herbivory in grassland: relative impact of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores. J Ecol 82:880–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Gutekunst K (2003) Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed size and successional status. Basic Appl Ecol 4(6):579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord LA, Lee TD (2001) Interactions of local and regional processes: species richness in tussock sedge communities. Ecology 82(2):313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Kauffman MJ (2006) Habitat-specific impacts of multiple consumers on plant population dynamics. Ecology 87(1):113–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JA, Harms KE (2009) Seed arrival, ecological filters, and plant species richness: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 12(11):1250–1260. doi:10.1111/J.1461-0248.2009.01373.X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Muller-Landau HC (2000) Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol Evol 15:278–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor TG (1994) Composition and population responses of an African savanna grassland to rainfall and grazing. J Appl Ecol 31:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor TG (1996) Hierarchical control over seedling recruitment of the bunch-grass Themeda triandra in a semi-arid savanna. J Appl Ecol 33(5):1094–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D (1981) Buried viable seeds in the North American tall-grass prairie: the resemblance of their abundance and composition to dispersing seeds. Oikos 36:191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader RJ, Jalili A, Grime JP, Mathews N (1992) A comparative study in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. J Ecol 81:543–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Renne IJ, Tracy BF, Colonna IA (2006) Shifts in grassland invasibility: effects of soil resources, disturbance, composition, and invader size. Ecology 87(9):2264–2277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser P (1993) Influences of neighbouring plants on seedling establishment in limestone grassland. J Veg Sci 4(2):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL (1998) Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J Clim 11(12):3128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monog 57(3):189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedin D, Tilman D (1993) Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol Monog 63:199–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5(11):360–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2003) Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands. Ecology 84(4):920–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M, Kalamees R (2005) Diversity and dispersal: can the link be approached experimentally? Folia Geobotanica 40(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M, Otsus M, Liira J, Moora M, Möls T (2000) Is small-scale richness in a calcareous grassland limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81:3274–3282

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank D. DeVetter, C. Essenberg, S. Jerke, L. Knutson, and a crew of field-hardened Cedar Creek interns for their invaluable assistance in collecting these data and S. Hobbie and anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Dybzinski.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dybzinski, R., Tilman, D. Seed and microsite limitation in a late-successional old field: the effects of water, adults, litter, and small mammals on seeds and seedlings. Plant Ecol 213, 1003–1013 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0060-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0060-2

Keywords

Navigation