Plant Ecology

, Volume 212, Issue 12, pp 2095–2110

How do drought and fire influence the patterns of resprouting in Australian deserts?


DOI: 10.1007/s11258-011-9988-x

Cite this article as:
Nano, C.E.M. & Clarke, P.J. Plant Ecol (2011) 212: 2095. doi:10.1007/s11258-011-9988-x


Rainfall is the key driver of woody cover and life-history attributes in arid grassy biomes where disturbance is mostly rare and of low intensity. However, relatively little is known about the causes of woody community assembly in arid systems that are subject to periodic intense fire disturbance. In the central Australian desert region, grassland and shrubland fire can occur following above average rainfall. Patterns of species regeneration response (resprouting vs. reseeding) are poorly documented in this region. We tested the effects of rainfall and fire on species’ resprouting response across the latitudinal rainfall–fire gradient using constrained ordination of 385 sites and general linear models. A resprouting response was significantly greater in grassland habitat as well as at the high end of the rainfall–fire gradient. The frequency of epicormic stem resprouting also increased along the rainfall–fire gradient. We attribute this pattern to the combined effects of frequent fire and rapid gap closure on seedlings of slow-growing, fire-killed woody species in higher rainfall grasslands. In addition, we also demonstrated that rapidly maturing fire-recruiting species are similarly favoured by high fire disturbance. In arid grassy ecosystems, unlike in mesic savanna, flammable grassland supports a mix of resprouting and recruitment functional types, and habitat membership cannot be predicted by resprouting capacity. Regions, such as central Australia, that are characterised by grassland–shrubland mosaics of high and low fuel biomass, respectively, pose specific challenges to fire ecology research that are possibly best dealt with by focussing modelling at the habitat scale.


Arid vegetation Canopy fire Fire-response traits Grass Fire interactions Resource competition Savanna 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biodiversity Conservation Division, NT Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and SportWinnellieAustralia
  2. 2.Botany, School of Environmental and Rural SciencesUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations