How do drought and fire influence the patterns of resprouting in Australian deserts?
Rainfall is the key driver of woody cover and life-history attributes in arid grassy biomes where disturbance is mostly rare and of low intensity. However, relatively little is known about the causes of woody community assembly in arid systems that are subject to periodic intense fire disturbance. In the central Australian desert region, grassland and shrubland fire can occur following above average rainfall. Patterns of species regeneration response (resprouting vs. reseeding) are poorly documented in this region. We tested the effects of rainfall and fire on species’ resprouting response across the latitudinal rainfall–fire gradient using constrained ordination of 385 sites and general linear models. A resprouting response was significantly greater in grassland habitat as well as at the high end of the rainfall–fire gradient. The frequency of epicormic stem resprouting also increased along the rainfall–fire gradient. We attribute this pattern to the combined effects of frequent fire and rapid gap closure on seedlings of slow-growing, fire-killed woody species in higher rainfall grasslands. In addition, we also demonstrated that rapidly maturing fire-recruiting species are similarly favoured by high fire disturbance. In arid grassy ecosystems, unlike in mesic savanna, flammable grassland supports a mix of resprouting and recruitment functional types, and habitat membership cannot be predicted by resprouting capacity. Regions, such as central Australia, that are characterised by grassland–shrubland mosaics of high and low fuel biomass, respectively, pose specific challenges to fire ecology research that are possibly best dealt with by focussing modelling at the habitat scale.
KeywordsArid vegetation Canopy fire Fire-response traits Grass Fire interactions Resource competition Savanna
- Allan GE, Southgate RI (2002) Fire regimes in the spinifex landscapes of Australia. In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 145–176Google Scholar
- Bureau of Meteorology (2011) Climate (Cited 15 April 2011). Available from URL:http://www.bom.gov.au/climate.htm
- Crowley G, Gardener M, Marrinan M (2007) Tropical savannas fire response database. Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre, DarwinGoogle Scholar
- Falster DS, Westoby M (2005) Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland. Aust J Ecol 93:521–535Google Scholar
- Higgins SI, Bond WJ, February EC, Bronn A, Euston-Brown DIW, Enslin B, Govender N, Rademan L, O’Regan S, Potgieter ALF, Scheiter S, Sowry R, Trollope L, Trollope WSW (2007) Effects of four decades of fire manipulation on woody vegetation structure in savanna. Ecology 88:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lawes MJ, Adie H, Russell-Smith J, Murphy B, Midgley J (2011) How do small savanna trees avoid stem mortality by fire? The role of stem diameter, height and bark thickness. Ecosphere 2(4). doi:10.1890/ES10-00204.1
- Leps J, Smilauer P (2005) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1981) Concepts and models of succession in vascular plant communities subject to recurrent fire. In: Gill AM, Groves RH, Noble IR (eds) Fire and the Australian biota. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp 311–334Google Scholar
- Ojeda F (1998) Biogeography of seeder and resprouter Erica species in the Cape Floristic region—where are the resprouters? Biol J Linn Soc 63:331–347Google Scholar
- Specht RL (1981) Responses to fires in heathlands and related shrublands. In: Gill AM, Groves RH, Noble IR (eds) Fire and the Australian biota. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp 395–415Google Scholar
- ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC (1989) A theory of gradient analysis. Advan Ecol Res 18:272–317Google Scholar
- ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar