Plant Ecology

, Volume 212, Issue 12, pp 2071–2083 | Cite as

Fire interval effects on persistence of resprouter species in Mediterranean-type shrublands

  • N. J. Enright
  • J. B. Fontaine
  • V. C. Westcott
  • J. C. Lade
  • B. P. Miller


The capacity of many plant species to resprout in fire-prone shrublands is thought to engender persistence, yet management concerns exist for the long-term persistence of some resprouting species given anthropogenic impacts including shortened fire intervals, long periods of fire exclusion, and/or fires of increasingly high severity. We explored the potential demographic effects of different fire interval regimes on lignotuberous resprouter species using the last fire interval for 36 sites (33 experimental fires, 3 wildfires) in biodiverse SW Australian shrublands, spanning an interval range of 3–42 years. Mortality and regrowth 1 year following the last fire was assessed for >7,000 tagged individuals from 20 shrub and sub-shrub species. Using generalized linear mixed effect models, we estimated the influence of fire interval (and selected fire and environmental covariates) on mortality and regrowth rates across all species, and individually for the four most common species. The overall model, as well as the models for three of the four most common species (Banksia attenuata, Melaleuca leuropoma, and M. systena, but not Hibbertia hypericoides) supported the hypothesis of increased mortality at short and long fire intervals, most likely due to total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) and bud-bank limitation, respectively. However, no relationship between regrowth rate and fire interval was detected, suggesting that increased mortality at short (3–5 year) fire intervals may not be due solely to resource (TNC) limitation. Results show that lignotuberous resprouters are potentially vulnerable to population decline through attrition of mature plants under both shortened and lengthened fire interval regimes.


Bud bank Lignotuber Resprouting Fire regime Mortality Banksia Melaleuca 

Supplementary material

11258_2011_9970_MOESM1_ESM.docx (191 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 191 kb)


  1. Auld TD (1990) The survival of juvenile plants of the resprouting shrub Angophora hispida (Myrtaceae) after a simulated low-intensity fire. Aust J Bot 38:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes.
  3. Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD (2000) Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 89:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol 16:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond WJ, Van Wilgen BW (1996) Fire and plants. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen BJ, Pate JS (1993) The significance of root starch in postfire shoot recovery of the resprouter Stirlingia latifolia R. Br (Proteaceae). Ann Bot 72:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradstock RA, Myerscough PJ (1988) The survival and population response to frequent fires of 2 woody resprouters Banksia serrata and Isopogon anemonifolius. Aust J Bot 36:415–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows N (1985) Reducing the abundance of Banksia grandis in the Jarrah forest by the use of prescribed fire. Aust For 48:63–70Google Scholar
  10. Canadell J, Lopez-Soria L (1998) Lignotuber reserves support regrowth following clipping of two Mediterranean shrubs. Funct Ecol 12:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canadell J, Lloret F, Lopez-Soria L (1991) Resprouting vigour of 2 Mediterranean shrub species after experimental fire treatments. Vegetatio 95:119–126Google Scholar
  12. Cary G, Morrison DA (1995) Effects of the fire frequency on plant-species composition of sandstone communities in the Sydney region—combinations of inter-fire intervals. Aust J Ecol 20:418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesson PL (1983) Coexistence of competitors in a stochastic environment: the storage effect. Lect Notes Biomath 52:188–198Google Scholar
  14. Enright NJ, Lamont BB (1992) Recruitment variability in the resprouting shrub Banksia attentuata and non-sprouting congeners in the northern sandplain heaths of southwestern Australia. Acta Oecol 13:727–741Google Scholar
  15. Enright NJ, Marsula R, Lamont BB, Wissel C (1998a) The ecological significance of canopy seed storage in fire-prone environments: a model for non-sprouting shrubs. J Ecol 86:946–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enright NJ, Marsula R, Lamont BB, Wissel C (1998b) The ecological significance of canopy seed storage in fire-prone environments: a model for resprouting shrubs. J Ecol 86:960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins SI, Flores O, Schurr FM (2008) Cost of persistence and the spread of competing seeders and resprouters. J Ecol 96:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hnatiuk RJ, Hopkins AJM (1981) An ecological analysis of kwongan vegetation south of Eneabba, Western Australia. Aust J Ecol 6:423–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodgkinson KC (1998) Sprouting success of shrubs after fire: height dependent relationships for different strategies. Oecologia 115:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holland PG (1969) The maintenance of structure and shape in three mallee eucalypts. New Phytol 68:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James S (1984) Lignotubers and burls—their structure, function and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Bot Rev 50:225–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeley JE (1986) Resilience of mediterranean shrub communities to fires. In: Dell B, Hopkins AMJ, Lamont BB (eds) Resilience in mediterranean-type ecosystems. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp 95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keith DA, McCaw WL, Whelan RJ (2002) Fire regimes in Australian heathlands and their effects on plants and animals. In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 199–237Google Scholar
  24. Knox KJE, Clarke PJ (2006) Response of resprouting shrubs to repeated fires in the dry sclerophyll forest of Gibraltar Range National Park. Proc Linn Soc NSW 127:49–56Google Scholar
  25. Kruger LM, Midgley JJ, Cowling RM (1997) Resprouters vs reseeders in South African forest trees; A model based on forest canopy height. Funct Ecol 11:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamont BB, Wiens D (2003) Are seed set and speciation rates always low among species that resprout after fire, and why? Evol Ecol 17:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) Bushfires in Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Malanson GP, Trabaud L (1988) Vigour of post-fire resprouting by Quercus coccifera L. J Ecol 76:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Midgley JJ (1996) Why the world’s vegetation is not totally dominated by resprouting plants; because resprouters are shorter than reseeders. Ecography 19:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller GR, Miles J (1970) Regeneration of heather (Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull) at different ages and seasons in north-east scotland. J Appl Ecol 7:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno JM, Oechel WC (1991) Fire intensity and herbivory effects on postfire resprouting of Adenostoma fasciculatum in southern California chaparral. Oecologia 85:429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morrison DA, Cary GJ, Pengelly SM, Ross DG, Mullins BJ, Thomas CR, Anderson TS (1995) Effects of fire frequency on plant species composition of sandstone communities in the Sydney region: Inter-Fire interval and time-since-fire. Aust J Ecol 20:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noble JC (2001) Lignotubers and meristem dependence in mallee (Eucalyptus sp.) coppicing after fire. Aust J Bot 49:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1977) The effect of disturbance on plant succession. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 10:135–145Google Scholar
  35. Noble IR, Bary GAV, Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Aust J Ecol 5:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pate JS, Froend RH, Bowen BJ, Hansen A, Kuo J (1990) Seedling growth and storage characteristics of seeder and resprouter species of Mediterranean-type ecosystems of SW Australia. Ann Bot 65:585–601Google Scholar
  37. Paula S, Ojeda F (2006) Resistance of three co-occurring resprouter Erica species to highly frequent disturbance. Plant Ecol 183:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2.12.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
  39. Trabaud L (1991) Fire regimes and phytomass growth dynamics in a Quercus coccifera garrigue. J Veg Sci 2:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vesk PA, Westoby M (2004) Funding the bud bank: a review of the costs of buds. Oikos 106:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vila M, Terradas J (1995) Effects of competition and disturbance on the resprouting performance of the Mediterranean shrub Erica multiflora L. (Ericaceae). Am J Bot 82:1241–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams R, Bradstock R, Cary G, Enright N, Gill A, Liedloff A, Lucas C, Whelan R, Andersen A, Bowman D, Clarke P, Cook GD, Hennessy K, York A (2009) Interactions between climate change, fire regimes and biodiversity in australia—a preliminary assessment. Department of Climate Change and Department of Environment, Water Heritage and the Arts, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright BR, Clarke PJ (2007) Resprouting responses of shrubs in the Western Desert of Australia, fire severity, interval and season influence survival. Int J Wildl Fire 16:317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zammit CA, Zedler PH (1988) The influence of dominant shrubs, fire, and time since fire on soil seed banks in mixed Chaparral. Vegetatio 75:175–187Google Scholar
  45. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. J. Enright
    • 1
  • J. B. Fontaine
    • 1
  • V. C. Westcott
    • 2
  • J. C. Lade
    • 2
  • B. P. Miller
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Environmental ScienceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Resource Management and GeographyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Botanical Gardens and Parks AuthorityPerthAustralia
  4. 4.School of Plant SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations