Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The shifting balance of facilitation and competition affects the outcome of intra- and interspecific interactions over the life history of California grassland annuals

Plant Ecology volume 208, pages 333–345 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Trait-based resource competition in plants, wherein more similar plants compete more strongly for resources, is a foundation of niche-based explanations for the maintenance of diversity in plant communities. Alternatively, neutral theory predicts that community diversity can be maintained despite equivalent resource requirements among species. We examined interactions at three life history stages (germination, survival, and juvenile-adult growth) for three native and three exotic California annual species in a glasshouse experiment. We varied plant density and species composition in small pots, with pots planted with either intraspecific seeds or in a three species mix of intra- and interspecific neighbors. We saw a range of facilitative, neutral, and competitive interactions that varied significantly by species, rather than by native or exotic status. There were more competitive interactions at the emergence and juvenile-adult growth stages and more facilitative interactions for survival. Consequently, the relative strength of competition in intraspecific versus mixed-species communities depended on whether we considered only the juvenile-adult growth stage or the entire life history of the interacting plants. Using traditional analysis of juvenile-adult growth only, all species showed negative density-dependent interactions for final biomass production. However, when the net effect of plant interactions from seed to adult was considered, which is a prediction of population growth, two native species ceased to show negative density dependence, and the difference between intraspecific and mixed-species competition was only significant for one exotic species. Results were consistent with predictions of neutral, rather than niche, theory for five of six species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Aarssen LW, Turkington R (1985) Biotic specialization between neighboring genotypes in lolium-perenne and trifolium-repens from a permanent pasture. J Ecol 73:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PB (2004) Neutral models fail to reproduce observed species-area and species-time relationships in Kansas grasslands. Ecology 85:1265–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar MR, Lauenroth WK, Peters DP (2001) Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. J Ecol 89:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J, Levin DA (1980) The ecological and genetic consequences of density-dependent regulation in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:411–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Pugnaire FI (2005) Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. J Ecol 93:978–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Yeh SM (1994) Cooperative and competitive interactions in the recruitment of marsh elders. Ecology 75:2416–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker R, Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI et al (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM et al (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. TREE 18:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SP, Hendry AP, Reznick DN, Fox CW (2007) Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausnitzer DW, Borman MM, Johnson DE (1999) Competition between Elymus elymoides and Taeniatherum caput-medusae. Weed Sci 47:720–728

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman GD, Wedin DA, Chapin FS (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland EK, Rice KJ (2007) Facilitation across stress gradients: the importance of local adaptation. Ecology 88:2404–2409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland EK, Rice KJ (in press) Survivorship and plant–plant interactions: maintaining the evolutionary potential of restored populations. California Native Plant Society 2009 conservation conference: strategies and solutions. Conference proceedings. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA

  • Evans DR, Hill J, Williams TA, Rhodes I (1985) Effects of coexistence on the performance of white clover perennial ryegrass mixtures. Oecol 66:536–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities—a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR (2001) Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecol Monogr 71:423–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DR, Rice KJ (1992) Partitioning of space and water between 2 California annual grassland species. Am J Bot 79:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant CA, Johnston AM, Clayton GW (2004) Sulphur fertilizer and tillage management of canola and wheat in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 84:453–462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS (1992) A metaanalysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat 140:539–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpole WS, Suding KN (2007) Frequency-dependence stabilizes competitive interactions among four annual plants. Ecol Lett 10:1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harpole WS, Tilman D (2006) Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. Ecol Lett 9:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Gaines MS (1992) Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes—implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol Ecol 6:433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard TG, Goldberg DE (2001) Competitive response hierarchies for germination, growth, and survival and their influence on abundance. Ecology 82:979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2005) Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct Ecol 19:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey LD, Schupp EW (2004) Competition as a barrier to establishment of a native perennial grass (Elymus elymoides) in alien annual grass (Bromus tectorum) communities. J Arid Env 58:405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter AF, Aarssen LW (1988) Plants helping plants. Biosci 38:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye RS (1980) Density-dependent germination response by seeds of desert annuals. Oecol 46:235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1976) Density-dependent seed-germination strategies in colonizing versus non-colonizing plant species. J Ecol 64:375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Turkington R (2002) The effect of initial seed density on the structure of a desert annual plant community. J Ecol 90:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Turkington R (2008) Species-specific positive effects in an annual plant community. Oikos 117:1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R, Levins R (1967) Limiting similarity convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MM, Harding J (1981) Evidence for the evolution of competition between 2 species of annual plants. Evolution 35:975–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR et al (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature 415:68–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miriti MN (2006) Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub. J Ecol 94:973–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishita DW, Thill DC, Hammel JE (1991) Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) interference in a greenhouse experiment. Weed Sci 39:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmblad IG (1968) Composition in experimental populations of weeds with emphasis on the regulation of population size. Ecology 49:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantastico-Caldas M, Venable DL (1993) Competition in 2 species of desert annuals along a topographic gradient. Ecology 74:2192–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell KI, Knight TM (2009) Effects of nutrient addition and competition on biomass of five Cirsium species (Asteraceae), including a serpentine endemic. Int J Plant Sci 170:918–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffers K, Tielborger K (2006) Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants. J Ecol 94:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CD, Hickman KR, Channell R, Harmoney K, Stark W (2008) Competitive abilities of native grasses and non-native (Bothriochloa spp.) grasses. Plant Ecol 197:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RG, Antonovics J (1986) Density-dependence in Salvia lyrata, a herbaceous perennial—the effects of experimental alteration of seed densities. J Ecol 74:797–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheley RL, Larson LL (1994) Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. J Range Mgmt 47:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilo-Volin H, Novoplansky A, Goldberg DE, Turkington R (2005) Density regulation in annual plant communities under variable resource levels. Oikos 108:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrefler JW, Shilling DG, Dusky JA, Brecke BJ (1994) Influence of phosphorus fertility on intraspecific and interspecific interference between lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and spiny amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus). Weed Sci 42:574–578

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. TREE 19:605–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner RH (2005) Emergence and survival of pasture species sown in monocultures or mixtures. Agron J 97:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1990) Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. In: Tilman D, Grace J (eds) Perspectives in plant competition. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman EA, Tilman D, Crawley MJ, Johnston AE (1999) Biological weed control via nutrient competition: potassium limitation of dandelions. Ecol Apps 9:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ, Brooker RW, Dytham C (2005) The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model. Biol Lett 1:5–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ, Brooker RW, Clark EJ, Dytham C (2006) The distribution of positive and negative species interactions across environmental gradients on a dual-lattice model. J Theor Biol 241:896–902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turkington R, Harper JL (1979) Growth, distribution and neighbor relationships of Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture.4. Fine-scale biotic differentiation. J Ecol 67:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velagala RP, Sheley RL, Jacobs JS (1997) Influence of density on intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed interference. J Range Mgmt 50:523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M (2008) Effects of diversity on diversity: consequences of competition and facilitation. Oikos 117:1075–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmuth BE, Stoll P, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2009) Spatial aggregation facilitates coexistence and diversity of wild plant species in field margins. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 11:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1984) The self-thinning rule. Adv Ecol Res 14:167–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsey BJ, Teaschner TB, Daneshgar PP, Isbell FI, Polley HW (2009) Biodiversity maintenance mechanisms differ between native and novel exotic-dominated communities. Ecol Lett 12:432–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zavaleta ES, Hulvey KB (2004) Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders. Science 306:1175–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QG, Buckling A, Godfray HCJ (2009) Quantifying the relative importance of niches and neutrality for coexistence in a model microbial system. Funct Ecol 23:1139–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to S. Elmendorf, K. Moore, A. Sparrow, and three anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments on the manuscript, and to S. Elmendorf, K. Moore, and B. Baythavong for supplying us with seeds. Thanks to H. Zamma for tireless attention to detail in the greenhouse and laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Mail Stop 186, 1000 Valley Road, Reno, NV, 89512, USA

    Elizabeth A. Leger & Erin K. Espeland

  2. USDA ARS Pest Management Research Unit, 1500 N. Central Ave, Sidney, MT, 59270, USA

    Erin K. Espeland

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Leger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin K. Espeland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Leger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leger, E.A., Espeland, E.K. The shifting balance of facilitation and competition affects the outcome of intra- and interspecific interactions over the life history of California grassland annuals. Plant Ecol 208, 333–345 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9710-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9710-4

Keywords

search

Navigation