Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, 202:257 | Cite as

Regeneration potential of Taxodium distichum swamps and climate change

  • Beth A. Middleton
Article

Abstract

Seed bank densities respond to factors across local to landscape scales, and therefore, knowledge of these responses may be necessary in forecasting the effects of climate change on the regeneration of species. This study relates the seed bank densities of species of Taxodium distichum swamps to local water regime and regional climate factors at five latitudes across the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley from southern Illinois to Louisiana. In an outdoor nursery setting, the seed banks of twenty-five swamps were exposed to non-flooded (freely drained) or flooded treatments, and the number and species of seeds germinating were recorded from each swamp during one growing season. Based on ANOVA analysis, the majority of dominant species had a higher rate of germination in non-flooded versus flooded treatments. Similarly, an NMS comparison, which considered the local water regime and regional climate of the swamps, found that the species of seeds germinating, almost completely shifted under non-flooded versus flooded treatments. For example, in wetter northern swamps, seeds of Taxodium distichum germinated in non-flooded conditions, but did not germinate from the same seed banks in flooded conditions. In wetter southern swamps, seeds of Eleocharis cellulosa germinated in flooded conditions, but did not germinate in non-flooded conditions. The strong relationship of seed germination and density relationships with local water regime and regional climate variables suggests that the forecasting of climate change effects on swamps and other wetlands needs to consider a variety of interrelated variables to make adequate projections of the regeneration responses of species to climate change. Because regeneration is an important aspect of species maintenance and restoration, climate drying could influence the species distribution of these swamps in the future.

Keywords

Baldcypress Climate drying Distribution Global warming Latitude Precipitation Range compression Seed bank Seed dispersal Temperature 

Nomenclature

U.S.D.A. (2002) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the United States Geological Survey (8343-9HC4F). I would like to thank Ben Handley for field assistance on the project. Also thanks to Rassa Dale and Darren Johnson for statistical support, as well as Beth Vairin, Ken Krauss, Kari Foster, anonymous reviewers and the editor for critical review of the manuscript.

References

  1. Abernathy VM, Willby NJ (1999) Changes along a disturbance gradient in the density and composition of propagule banks in floodplain aquatic habitats. Plant Ecol 140:177–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1009779411686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andalo C, Beaulieu J, Bosquet J (2005) The impact of climate change on growth of local white spruce populations in Quebec, Canada. For Ecol Manage 205:169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson E, Nilsson C (2002) Temporal variation in the drift of plant litter and propagules in a small boreal river. Freshw Biol 47:1674–1684. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00925.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrat-Segretain MH (1996) Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: a review. Vegetatio 123:13–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00044885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds, ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  6. Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Ten Brinke A, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2004) Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relation to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported. J Ecol 92:786–796. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00906.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley NL, Leopold AC, Ross J, Huffaker W (1999) Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9701–9704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9701 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15144–15148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cellot B, Muillot F, Henry CP (1998) Flood drift and propagule bank of aquatic macrophytes in a riverine wetland. J Veg Sci 9:631–640. doi: 10.2307/3237281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crumpacker DW, Box EO, Hardin ED (2001) Implications of climatic warming for conservation of native trees and shrubs in Florida. Conserv Biol 15:1523–1739. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041008.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins RP, Miller GR (2002) Altitudinal gradients in seed dynamics of Calluna vulgaris in eastern Scotland. J Veg Sci 13:859–866. doi: 10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0859:AGISDO]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
  12. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074Google Scholar
  13. Fabbro T, Körner C (2004) Altitudinal differences in flower traits and reproductive allocation. Flora 199:70–81Google Scholar
  14. Funes G, Basconcelo S, Diaz S, Cabido M (2003) Seed bank dynamics in tall-tussock grasslands along an altitudinal gradient. J Veg Sci 14:253–258. doi: 10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0253:SBDITG]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia D, Zamora R, Gomez JM, Jordano P, Hodar JA (2000) Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. J Ecol 88:436–446. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00459.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gesch RW, Barbour NW, Forcella R, Voorhees WB (2002) Cuphea growth and development: responses to temperature. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26. doi: 10.2307/2479933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunther PP, Casagrande DJ, Cherney RR (1984) The viability and fate of seeds as a function of depth in the peat of Okenfenokee Swamp. In: Andrejko JJ, Best GR (eds) The Okefenokee Swamp: its natural history, geology, and geochemistry. Wetland Surveys, Los AlamosGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutiérrez JR, Meserve PL (2003) El Niño effects on soil seed bank dynamics in north-central Chile. Oecologia 134:511–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper JL (1977) The population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hengeveld H (2000) Projections for Canada’s climate future. Climate change digest CCD 00-01. Environment Canada. Meteorological Service of Canada, DownsviewGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am Nat 153:464–475. doi: 10.1086/303193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill NM, Vander Kloet SP (1999) Longevity of experimentally buried seed in Vaccinium: relationship to climate, reproductive factors and natural seed banks. J Ecol 93:1167–1176. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01034.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilligardt M (1993) Strategies of persistence and reproduction in Trifolium pallescens Schreb. and Trifolium thalii Vill.: II. Studies in population biology. Flora 188:175–195Google Scholar
  25. Hinds WT (1975) Energy and carbon balances in cheatgrass: an essay in autecology. Ecol Monogr 45:367–388. doi: 10.2307/1942412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. JMP (2007) JMP SAS Version 7.0.2. Statistical Analysis System, CaryGoogle Scholar
  27. Leck MA (1989) Wetland seed banks. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Little EL Jr (1971) Atlas of United States trees, vol 1. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146 USDA Forest Service. USGPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Lüdeke MKB, Badeck FW, Otto RD, Häger C, Dönges S, Kindermann J et al (1994) The Frankfurt Biosphere Model. A global process oriented model for the seasonal and long-term CO2 exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. I. Model description and illustrative results for cold deciduous and boreal forests. Clim Res 4:143–166. doi: 10.3354/cr004143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall JD, Blair JM, Peters DPC, Okin G, Rango A, Williams M (2008) Predicting and understanding ecosystem response to climate change at continental scales. Front Ecol Evol 5:273–280. doi: 10.1890/070165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MJM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  32. Middleton BA (1999) Wetland restoration flood pulsing and disturbance dynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Middleton BA (2000) Hydrochory, seed banks, and regeneration dynamics across landscape boundaries in a forested wetland. Plant Ecol 146:169–184. doi: 10.1023/A:1009871404477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Middleton BA (ed) (2002) Flood pulsing in wetlands: restoring the natural hydrological balance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton BA (2003) Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming. J Appl Ecol 40:1025–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00866.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middleton BA, McKee KL (2004) Use of a latitudinal gradient in bald cypress production to examine physiological controls on biotic boundaries and potential responses to environmental change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:247–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00088.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Middleton BA, Wu XB (2008) Landscape spatial distribution and anthropogenic change of seed banks in forested wetlands in the northern Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Ecoscience 15:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Middleton BA, van der Valk AG, Williams RL, Mason DH, Davis CB (1991) Vegetation dynamics and seed banks of a monsoonal wetland overgrown with Paspalum distichum in northern India. Aquat Bot 40:239–259. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(91)90061-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2005) Climate normal data. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/. Accessed 12 Apr 2005, Organization site
  41. Ortega M, Levassor C, Peco B (1997) Seasonal dynamics of Mediterranean pasture seed banks along environmental gradients. J Biogeogr 24:177–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00080.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pakeman RJ, Cummins RP, Miller GR, Roy DB (1999) Potential climatic control of seedbank density. Seed Sci Res 9:101–110Google Scholar
  43. Schneider RL, Sharitz RR (1986) Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. Am J Bot 73:1022–1030. doi: 10.2307/2444121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneider RL, Sharitz RR (1988) Hydrochory and regeneration in a bald cypress-water tupelo swamp forest. Ecology 69:1055–1063. doi: 10.2307/1941261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2007) Riversgages.com. http://www2.mvr.usace.army.mil/WaterControl/new/layout.cfm. Accessed 8 Apr 2007, Organization site
  46. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2002) Integrated taxonomic information system. USDA, Washington, DC. http://www.itis.usda.gov/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2005, Organization site
  47. U.S. Geological Survey (2007) USGS water data for the Nation. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. Accessed 8 Apr 2007, Organization site
  48. van der Valk AG, Davis CB (1978) The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59:322–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wetzel PR, van der Valk AG, Toth LA (2001) Restoration of wetland vegetation on the Kissimmee River floodplain: potential role of seed banks. Wetlands 21:189–198. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0189:ROWVOT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winn AA, Gross KL (1993) Latitudinal variation in seed weight and flower number in Prunella vulgaris. Oecologia 93:55–62Google Scholar
  51. Woodhouse CA, Overpeck JT (1998) 2000 years of drought variability in the central United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:2693–2714. doi :10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2693:YODVIT>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USGS National Wetlands Research CenterLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations