Plant Ecology

, Volume 196, Issue 1, pp 111–121 | Cite as

Long-term nitrogen deposition increases phosphorus limitation of bryophytes in an ombrotrophic bog

  • Mukunda Phuyal
  • Rebekka R. E. Artz
  • Lucy Sheppard
  • Ian D. Leith
  • David Johnson


Here we investigate the effect of 4 years simulated atmospheric deposition of ammonium (NH4) and nitrate (NO3), applied alone or in combination with phosphorus and potassium (PK), on the surface phosphatase activities and nutrient acquisition behaviour of two species of moss (Sphagnumcapillifolium and Hypnum jutlandicum) from an ombrotrophic peatland. Phosphatase activity was significantly enhanced by both the NH4 and NO3 treatments, particularly for Sphagnum, but the activity decreased when exposed to additions of PK. Regression analysis revealed that phosphatase activity on Sphagnum was positively related with tissue N and negatively related to tissue P concentrations. For Hypnum, a negative relationship between shoot P concentration and phosphatase activity was observed. Using a 32P tracer, mosses removed from plots receiving PK in combination with NH4 maintained their affinity for increased phosphorus uptake. These findings suggest that enhanced nutrient supply, even at modest doses, significantly alter the nutrient recycling behaviour of bryophytes.


Bog Bryophyte Nitrogen deposition Phosphatase Fertilization 


  1. Aldous AR (2002) Nitrogen translocation in Sphagnum mosses: effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. New Phytol 156:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres E, van der Wal R, Sommerkorn M et al (2006) Direct uptake of soil nitrogen by mosses. Biol Lett 2:286–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates JW (1992) Mineral nutrition acquisition and retention by bryophytes. J Bryol 17:223–240Google Scholar
  4. Bieleski RL (1973) Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Ann Rev Plant Biol 24:225–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bragazza L, Gerdol R, Rydin H (2003) Effects of mineral and nutrient input on mire bio-geochemistry in two geographical regions. J Ecol 91:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bragazza L, Limpens J, Gerdol R et al (2005) Nitrogen concentration and δ15 N signature of ombrotrophic Sphagnum mosses at different N deposition levels in Europe. Glob Change Biol 11:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christmas M, Whitton BA (1998) Phosphorus and aquatic bryophytes in the Swale-Ouse river system, north-east England. 1. Relationship between ambient phosphate, internal N:P ratio and surface phosphatase activity. Sci Total Environ 210:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clymo RS, Hayward PM (1982) The ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE (ed) Bryophyte ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp 229–289Google Scholar
  9. Fowler D, Smith RI, Muller JBA et al (2005) Changes in the atmospheric deposition of acidifying compounds in the UK between 1986 and 2001. Environ Pollut 137:15–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gidman EA, Stevens CJ, Goodacre R et al (2006) Using metabolic fingerprinting of plants for evaluating nitrogen deposition impacts on the landscape level. Glob Change Biol 12:1660–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands—role in the carbon-cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hewitt EJ (1966). Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition, vol 22. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux Technology (revised 2nd edn)Google Scholar
  13. John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant materials with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci 109:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson D, Leake JR, Lee JA et al (1998) Changes in soil microbial biomass and microbial activities in response to 7 years simulated pollutant nitrogen deposition on a heathland and two grasslands. Environ Pollut 103:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson D, Leake JR, Lee JA (1999) The effects of quantity and duration of simulated pollutant nitrogen deposition on root surface phosphatase activities in calcareous and acid grasslands: a bioassay approach. New Phytol 141:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kroehler CJ, Linkins AE (1991) The absorption of inorganic-phosphate from 32P-labeled inositol hexaphosphate by Eriophorum vaginatum. Oecologia 85:424–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Limpens J, Berendse F (2003) Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: the role of amino acid nitrogen concentration. Oecologia 135:339–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell RJ, Truscot AM, Leith ID et al (2005) A study of the epiphytic communities of Atlantic oak woods along an atmospheric nitrogen deposition gradient. J Ecol 93:482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearce ISK, Woodin SJ, Van der Wal R (2003) Physiological and growth response of montane bryophyte Racomitrium lanuginosum to atmospheric nitrogen deposition. New Phytol 160:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phoenix GK, Hicks WK, Cinderby S et al (2006) Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in world biodiversity hotspots: the need for a greater global perspective in assessing N deposition impacts. Glob Change Biol 12:470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pilkington MG, Caporn SJM, Carroll JA et al (2005) Effects of increased deposition of atmospheric nitrogen on upland Calluna moor: N and P transformations. Environ Pollut 135:469–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pitcairn CER, Fowler D, Grace J (1995) Deposition of fixed atmospheric nitrogen and foliar nitrogen-content of bryophytes and Calluna-vulgaris (L) Hull. Environ Pollut 88:93–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Plaxton WC, Carswell MC (1999) Metabolic aspects of the phosphate starvation response in plants. In: Lerner M (ed) Plant Response to Environmental Stress. M. Dekker Inc., New York, pp 349–372Google Scholar
  24. Press MC, Lee JA (1983) Acid phosphatase in Sphagnum species in relation to phosphate nutrition. New Phytol 93:567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Press MC, Woodin SJ, Lee JA (1986) The potential importance of an increased atmospheric nitrogen supply to the growth of ombrotrophic Sphagnum species. New Phytol 103:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodwell JS (1991) British plant communities, volume 2 mires and heaths. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudolph H, Voigt JU (1986) Effects of NH4-N and NO3-N on growth and metabolism of Sphagnum magellanicum. Physiol Plantarum 66:339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rydin H, Clymo RS (1989) Transport of carbon and phosphorus compounds about Sphagnum. Proc R Soc Lond B 237:63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheppard LJ, Crossley A, Leith ID et al (2004) An automated wet deposition system to compare effects of reduced and oxidised N on ombrotrophic bog species: practical considerations. Water, Air Soil Pollut Focus 4:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson D, Butterbach-Bahl K, Fagerli H et al (2006) Deposition and emissions of reactive nitrogen over European forests: a modelling study. Atmos Environ 40:5712–5726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Speirs GA, McGill WB (1979) Effects of phosphorus addition and energy supply on acid phosphatase production and activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 11:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology Biochem 1:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner BL, Baxter R, Ellwood NTW et al (2001) Characterization of phosphatase activities of mosses in relation to their environment. Plant Cell Environ 24:1165–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner BJ, Baxter R, Ellwood NTW et al (2003) Seasonal phosphatase activity of mosses from upper Teesdale, northern England. J Bryol 25:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Heijden E, Verbeek SK, Kuiper PJC (2000) Elevated atmospheric CO2 and increased nitrogen deposition: effects on C and N metabolism and growth of the peat moss Sphagnum recurvum P. Beauv. var. mucronatum (Russ.) Warnst. Glob Change Biol 6:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams B, Silcock D, Young M (1999) Seasonal dynamics of N in two Sphagnum moss species and the underlying peat treated with 15NH4 15NO3. Biogeochemistry 45:285–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukunda Phuyal
    • 1
  • Rebekka R. E. Artz
    • 2
  • Lucy Sheppard
    • 3
  • Ian D. Leith
    • 3
  • David Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  2. 2.Macaulay InstituteAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush EstateEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations