Plant Ecology

, Volume 192, Issue 2, pp 169–179 | Cite as

Flexible mating system in a logged population of Swietenia macrophylla King (Meliaceae): implications for the management of a threatened neotropical tree species

  • Maristerra R. Lemes
  • Dario Grattapaglia
  • James Grogan
  • John Proctor
  • Rogério Gribel
Original Paper

Abstract

Microsatellites were used to evaluate the mating system of the remaining trees in a logged population of Swietenia macrophylla, a highly valuable and threatened hardwood species, in the Brazilian Amazon. A total of 25 open pollinated progeny arrays of 16 individuals, with their mother trees, were genotyped using eight highly polymorphic microsatellite loci. Genotypic data analysis from the progeny arrays showed that 373 out of the 400 seedlings (93.25%) were unambiguously the result of outcrossed matings and that the remaining 6.75% had genotypes consistent with self-fertilisation. Apomixis could be ruled out, since none of the 400 seedlings analysed had a multi-locus genotype identical to its mother tree. The high estimate of the multi-locus outcrossing rate (tm = 0.938 ± 0.009) using the mixed mating model also indicated that the population in this remnant stand of S. macrophylla was predominantly allogamous. The relatively large difference between the multi-locus and single-locus outcrossing estimates (tm−ts = 0.117 ± 0.011) provides evidence that, in spite of the high outcrossing rate, a considerable degree of biparental inbreeding has contributed to the genetic structure of this population. Levels of outcrossing were not evenly distributed among maternal trees (tm ranging from 0.39 to 1.00), suggesting the occurrence of a variable degree of self-incompatibility and/or dichogamy among individual trees of this monoecious species. Due to its generalist pollination system and some level of tolerance for selfing, S. macrophylla seems to be resilient to environmental disturbances such as those caused by logging, since it sets fruits with predominantly outcrossed seeds even at low stand densities. Therefore, the remaining individuals in logged areas or in relict fragments may be very important for long-term population recovery and genetic conservation programmes.

Keywords

Amazon DNA microsatellites Genetic conservation Genetic diversity Mahogany Outcrossing 

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla ER, García-Barros R, Lara-Moreno C et al (1996) Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest tree species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:387–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett SCH, Husband BC (1990) The genetics of plant migration and colonization. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL et al (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawa KS (1990) Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boshier DH, Chase MR, Bawa KS (1995) Population genetics of Cordia alliadora (Boraginaceae), a Neotropical tree. 2. Mating system. Am J Bot 82:476–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown AHD, Barrett SCH, Moran GF (1985) Mating system estimation in forest trees: models, methods and meanings. In: Gregorius HR (eds) Population genetics in forestry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush RM, Smouse PE (1992) Evidence for the adaptive significance of allozymes in forest trees. New Forest 6: 179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cloutier D, Kanashiro M, Ciampi AY et al (2007) Impact of selective logging on inbreeding and gene dispersal in an Amazonian tree population of Carapa guianensis Aubl. Mol Ecol 16:797–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dayanandan S, Dole J, Bawa K et al (1999) Population structure delineated with microsatellite markers in fragmented populations of a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Mol Ecol 10:1585–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dick CW (2001) Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2391–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doligez A, Joly HI (1996) Genetic diversity and spatial structure within a natural stand of a tropical forest tree species, Carapa procera (Meliaceae), in French Guyana. Heredity 79:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doligez A, Joly HI (1997) Mating system of Carapa procera (Meliaceae) in the French Guyana tropical forest. Am J Bot 84:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  13. Eguiarte LE, Perez-Nasser N, Piñero D (1992) Genetic structure, outcrossing rate and heterosis in Astrocaryum mexicanum (tropical palm): implications for evolution and conservation. Heredity 69:217–228Google Scholar
  14. Federov AA (1966) The structure of the tropical rain forest and speciation in the humid tropics. J Ecol 54:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson JP, Wheelwright NT (1995) Genetic structure in a population of a tropical tree Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae): influence of avian seed dispersal. Oecologia 103:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillies ACM, Navarro C, Lowe AJ et al (1999) Genetic diversity in Mesoamerican populations of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla), assessed using RAPDs. Heredity 83:722–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gribel R, Gibbs PE, Queiroz AL (1999) Flowering phenology and pollination biology of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) in Central Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 15:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grogan J, Barreto P (2005) Big-leaf mahogany on CITES Appendix II: big challenge, big opportunity. Conserv Biol 19:973–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grogan J, Galvão J (2006) Physiographic and floristic gradients across topography in transitional seasonally dry evergreen forests of southeastern Amazonia, Brazil. Act Amazon 36:483–496Google Scholar
  20. Grogan J, Ashton MS, Galvão J (2003) Big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) seedling survival and growth across a topographic gradient in southeast Pará, Brazil. For Ecol Manage 186:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grogan J, Jennings SB, Landis RM et al (in press) What loggers leave behind: mahogany population structure and potential for recovery in the Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol ManageGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test for Hardy–Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:2868–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall P, Orrel LC, Bawa KS (1994) Genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot 81:1104–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James T, Vege S, Aldrich P (1998) Mating systems of three tropical dry forest tree species. Biotropica 30:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jarne P, Lagoda PJL (1996) Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. TREE 11:424–429Google Scholar
  26. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetics models. Evolution 39:24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemes MR, Brondani RPV, Grattapaglia D (2002) Multiplexed systems of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis in mahogany, Swietenia macrophylla King (Meliaceae), a threatened Neotropical timber species. J Hered 93:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemes MR, Gribel R, Proctor J et al (2003). Population genetic structure of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King, Meliaceae) across the Brazilian Amazon, based on variation at microsatellite loci: implications for conservation. Mol Ecol 12:2875–2883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loveless MD, Gullison RE (2003) Genetic variation in mahogany populations in Bolivia. In: Lugo AE, Figueroa Colon JC, Alayon M (eds) Big-leaf mahogany: genetics, ecology, and management. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL, Foster RB (1998) Population structure and mating system in Tachigali versicolor, a monocarpic Neotropical tree. Heredity 81:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1991) The effect of the density of flowering individuals on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species. Heredity 67:167–174Google Scholar
  32. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1992a) The mating system of Cavanillesia platanifolia under extremes of flowering-tree density: a test of predictions. Biotropica 24:99–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1992b) Mating system and phenology of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) in Central Panama. J Hered 83:401–404Google Scholar
  34. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL, Hubbell SP et al (1990) Mating systems of two Bombacaceous trees of a Neotropical moist forest. Oecologia 82:501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murawski DA, Dayanandan B, Bawa KS (1994) Outcrossing rates of two endemic Shorea species from Sri Lankan tropical rain forests. Biotropica 26:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Novick RR, Dick CW, Lemes MR et al (2003) Genetic structure of Mesoamerican populations of big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) inferred from microsatellite analyses. Mol Ecol 12:2885–2893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raymond M, Rousset F (1998) GENEPOP (version 3.1c) an updated version of GENEPOP V.1.2 (1995): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  38. Ribeiro RA, Lovato MB (2004) Mating system in a neotropical tree species, Senna multijuga (Fabaceae). Gen Mol Biol 27:418–424Google Scholar
  39. Ritland K (1983) Estimation of mating systems. In: Tanksley D, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant breeding and genetics, part A. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Ritland K (1988) The genetic-mating structure of subdivided populations II. Correlated mating models. Theor Popul Biol 34:320–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritland K (1989) Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritland K, El-Kassaby YA (1985) The nature of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Douglas-fir as shown by an efficient multilocus model. Theor Appl Gen 71:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritland K, Jain SK (1981) A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies based on n independent loci. Heredity 47:37–54Google Scholar
  45. Sebbenn AM, Kageyama PY, Siqueira ACMF et al (2000) Mating system in populations of Cariniana legalis Mart. O. Ktze: implications for genetic conservation and improvement. Scientia Forestalis 58:25–40Google Scholar
  46. Shaw DV, Kahler AL, Allard RW (1981) A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1298–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Styles BT (1972) The flower biology of the Meliaceae and its bearing on tree breeding. Silvae Gen 21:175–182Google Scholar
  48. Uyenoyama MK (1986) Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practising biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40:388–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ward M, Dick CW, Gribel R et al (2005) To self, or not to self…A review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. Heredity 95:246–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  51. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White GM, Boshier DH (1999) Genetic variation within a fragmented population of Swietenia humilis Zucc. Mol Ecol 11:1899–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White GM, Boshier DH (2000) Fragmentation in Central American dry forests—genetic impacts on Swietenia humilis. In: Young AG, Clarck G (eds) Genetics, demography and the viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2038–2042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright S (1921) Systems of mating II. The effects of inbreeding on the genetic composition of a population. Genetics 6:124–143PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maristerra R. Lemes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dario Grattapaglia
    • 3
  • James Grogan
    • 4
    • 5
  • John Proctor
    • 2
  • Rogério Gribel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Genética e Biologia Reprodutiva de PlantasInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaManausBrazil
  2. 2.School of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingScotland, UK
  3. 3.Laboratório de Genética de PlantasEMBRAPA-Recursos Genéticos e BiotecnologiaBrasíliaBrazil
  4. 4.Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (IMAZON)BelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations