Skip to main content
Log in

Tools for Carex revegetation in freshwater wetlands: understanding dormancy loss and germination temperature requirements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carex is a globally distributed genus with more than 2000 species worldwide and Carex species are the characteristic vegetation of sedge meadow wetlands. In the mid-continental United States, Carex species are dominant in natural freshwater wetlands yet are slow to recolonize hydrologically restored wetlands. To aid in Carex revegetation efforts, we determined the dormancy breaking and temperature germination requirements of 12 Carex species. Seeds were cold stratified at 5/1°C for 0–6 months and then incubated in light at 5/1°C, 14/1°C, 22/8°C, 27/15°C, or 35/30°C. We found that all Carex species produced conditionally dormant seeds. The optimal temperature for germination for all but three species was 27/15°C. As is the case in other species with physiological dormancy, cold stratification increased germination percentages, broadened the temperature range suitable for germination, and increased germination rates for most species, but the magnitude of the effects varied among species. Many species germinated to 80% at 27/15°C without cold stratification and at 22/8°C with ≤1 month of stratification but required much longer stratification (up to 6 months depending on the species) to germinate to 80% at 14/1°C and 35/30°C. Our findings illustrate how a stratification pretreatment can greatly benefit Carex seed sowing efforts by triggering rapid germination to higher percentages. We recommend that cold stratification be targeted towards species with strong dormancy or used across a wider range of species when seed supplies for restoration are limiting. For Carex revegetation, establishing Carex canopies rapidly may help to prevent the invasion of undesirable species such as Phalaris arundinacea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Analytical Software (2003) Statistix 8.0. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley TM (ed) (1986) Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds – ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard JM (1990) Life history and vegetative reproduction in Carex. Can J Bot 68:1441–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnen JL, Galatowitsch SM (2005) Spring Peeper Meadow: revegetation practices in a seasonal wetland restoration in Minnesota. Ecol Restor 23:172–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky RA, Galatowitsch SM (1999) Effects of moisture, temperature, and time on seed germination of five wetland Carices: implications for restoration. Restor Ecol 7:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky RA, Galatowitsch SM (2000) Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands. J Appl Ecol 37:971–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky RA, Galatowitsch SM (2004) Establishment of Carex stricta Lam. seedlings in experimental wetlands with implications for restoration. Plant Ecol 175:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PJ, Burton CM (2002) Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecol Restor 20:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell A, Rieger JP (1997) What practitioners need from restoration ecologists. Restor Ecol 5:350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diboll N (1997) Designing seed mixes. In: Packard S, Mutel CF (eds) The tallgrass restoration handbook for prairies, savannas, and woodlands. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 125–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes BC (1993) Small-scale wetland restoration in the high Arctic: a long-term perspective. Restor Ecol 1:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, Biederman LA (1998) Vegetation and seedbank composition of temporarily flooded Carex meadows and implications for restoration. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 24:253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, van der Valk AG (1996a) Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, van der Valk AG (1996b) Vegetation and environmental conditions in recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region of the USA. Plant Ecol 126:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, van der Valk AG (1996c) The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecol Appl 6:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, Budelsky RA, Yetka LA (1999) Revegetation strategies for northern temperate glacial marshes and meadows. In: Streever W (ed) An international perspective on wetland rehabilitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe DF (ed) (1970) Tetrazolium testing handbook for agricultural seeds. Contribution no. 29 to the handbook on seed testing. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Lincoln, Nebraska

  • Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2001) Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha xglauca). Can J Bot 79:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2002) Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. J Appl Ecol 39:134–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Mason G, Curtis AV, Rodman J, Band SR (1981) A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flora. J Ecol 69:1017–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD, Loik ME, Lin EHV, Samuels IA (2000) Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restor Ecol 8:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes PM, Richardson DM (1999) Protocols for restoration based on recruitment dynamics, community structure, and ecosystem function: perspectives from South African fynbos. Restor Ecol 7:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd EG, Shaw NL (1992) Seed technology for Carex and Juncus species of the intermountain region. In: Landis TD (ed) Intermountain Nurseryman Association annual meeting. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Park City, UT, pp 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone IM (1986) Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 61:369–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KL, Roundy BA, Shaw NL, Taylor JR (2004) Environmental effects on germination of Carex utriculata and Carex nebrascensis relative to riparian restoration. Wetlands 24:467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring KM (2006) Seed ecology of wetland Carex spp. – implications for restoration. Applied Plant Sciences. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 133 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring KM, Gardner GM, Galatowitsch SM (2006) Effect of light on seed germination of eight wetland Carex species. Ann Bot 98:869–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leck MA (1989) Wetland seed banks. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 283–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler JB (2001) Effect of light on seed germination in Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass). Plant Ecol 155:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin D, Chambers JC (2002) Restoration of riparian meadows degraded by livestock grazing: above- and belowground responses. Plant Ecol 163:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer DA, Zedler JB (2002) Differential invasion of a wetland grass explained by tests of nutrients and light availability on establishment and clonal growth. Oecologia 131:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse JM, Galatowitsch SM (2003) Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-reflooding. Plant Ecol 169:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry LG, Galatowitsch SM, Rosen CJ (2004) Competitive control of invasive vegetation: a native wetland sedge suppresses Phalaris arundinacea in carbon-enriched soil. J Appl Ecol 41:151–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz W (2000) Ecology of seed dormancy and germination in sedges (Carex). Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz W, Rave G (1999) The effect of cold stratification and light on the seed germination of temperate sedges (Carex) from various habitats and implications for regenerative strategies. Plant Ecol 144:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steed JE, DeWald LE (2003) Transplanting sedges (Carex spp.) in southwestern riparian meadows. Restor Ecol 11:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NRCS (2005) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA. http://plants.usda.gov

  • van der Valk AG, Bremholm TL, Gordon E (1999) The restoration of sedge meadows: seed viability, seed germination requirements, and seedling growth of Carex species. Wetlands 19:756–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijdeven SMJ, Kuzee ME (2000) Seed availability as a limiting factor in forest recovery processes in Costa Rica. Restor Ecol 8:414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanini L, Ganade G (2005) Restoration of Araucaria forest: the role of perches, pioneer vegetation, and soil fertility. Restor Ecol 13:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Carol Baskin, Albert Markhart, Carrie Reinhardt Adams, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This study would not have been possible without field and lab assistance from Stacey Olszewski, growth chamber support from Mike Emerick, statistical advice from Christopher Bingham, and funding from a graduate student grant from Applied Ecological Services, a Brand Fellowship from the University of Minnesota Graduate School, a Delta Waterfowl graduate student fellowship, a Dayton Fellowship from the Bell Museum of Natural History, and the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station to the first author. This is a publication of the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin M. Kettenring.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kettenring, K.M., Galatowitsch, S.M. Tools for Carex revegetation in freshwater wetlands: understanding dormancy loss and germination temperature requirements. Plant Ecol 193, 157–169 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9255-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9255-8

Keywords

Navigation