Disturbance persistence in managed grasslands: shifts in aboveground community structure and the weed seed bank
- 265 Downloads
The length of time and form in which disturbances persist in systems depends on the intensity and frequency of disturbance and on the abilities of resident species to recover from such events. In grazed grasslands, trampling by large mammalian herbivores can periodically facilitate weed establishment by exposing patches of bare ground but whether an intense soil disturbance event results in a temporary increase in weed abundance or a persistent weed problem remains unclear. In May 2002, cattle trampling following heavy rain caused severe damage to nine-month old, rotationally grazed, cool-season pastures (Midwest USA). In September 2002, we compared the aboveground composition of paddocks (i.e., fenced pasture sections) that were heavily disturbed to those that received no damage. Relative to undisturbed paddocks, forage species relative cover was 17% lower in disturbed paddocks, and weed species and bare ground relative cover was 61% and 100% higher, respectively. By September 2004, paddock types did not differ in all aboveground community components. However, the abundance and species richness of weed seeds in the soil seed bank averaged respectively 82% and 30% higher in disturbed paddocks between 2003 and 2004. These findings indicate that a spatially extensive, intense soil disturbance event may soon become undetectable in components of aboveground pasture structure but can persist as an augmented weed seed bank. Because of high weed seed bank longevity, disturbances to formerly disturbed pastures would likely result in higher weed recruitment, with more species represented, than in those which lack previous disturbance. Disturbance history may thus be a useful predictor of weed community composition following subsequent disturbance. Based on empirical data supporting this proposition, we recommend that grassland managers explicitly incorporate disturbance history into dynamic management planning and do not rely exclusively on aboveground characters to evaluate the invasion status or colonization potential of an area by undesirable plants. We emphasize that the ecological legacies of past soil disturbance events cannot only influence the contemporary patterns and processes of grasslands, but importantly, affect their compositional trajectories following subsequent perturbation.
KeywordsEcological legacies Site history Community trajectories Soil seed bank C3 pasture invasions Weed recruitment dynamics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We thank Jim Dalquist, Danny Graham and Larry Spencer for their pasture management efforts and Michael Masters and Greg Winter for their help with the soil seed bank study. German Bollero is thanked for his statistical assistance. Comments by James Cahill and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved an earlier draft.
- Cleland EE, Smith MD, Andelman SJ, Bowles C, Carney KM, Horner-Devine MC, Drake JM, Emery SM, Gramling JM, Vandermast DB (2004) Invasion in space and time: non-native species richness and relative abundance respond to interannual variation in productivity and diversity. Ecol Lett 7:947–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fales SL, McMurry SA, Weise WT (1993) The role of pasture in northeastern dairy farming: historical perspective, trends, research imperatives for the future. In: Sims JT (ed) Agricultural research in the United States: critical review and future perspectives. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 111–133Google Scholar
- Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35Google Scholar
- Keeley JE, Lubin D, Fotheringham CJ (2003) Fire and grazing impacts on plant diversity and alien plant invasions in the southern Sierra Nevada. Ecol Appl 13:1355–1374Google Scholar
- Kwit C, Platt WJ (2003) Disturbance history influences regeneration of non-pioneer understory trees. Ecology 84:2575–2581Google Scholar
- Littell RC, Stroup W, Freund RJ (2002) SAS for linear models. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 371–384Google Scholar
- Renne IJ, Tracy BF, Colonna IA (2006) Shifts in grassland invasibility: effects of soil resources, disturbance, composition, and invader size. Ecology 87:2264–2277Google Scholar
- SAS (2003) The statistical analysis system, version 91. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Tracy BF, Sanderson MA (2000) Seedbank diversity in grazing lands of the Northeast United States. J Range Manage 53:114–118Google Scholar
- Uva RH, Neal JC, DiTomaso JM (1997) Weeds of the Northeast. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 397 ppGoogle Scholar
- Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2003) Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands. Ecology 84:920–931Google Scholar