Plant Ecology

, Volume 177, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

Influence of light and soil moisture on Sierran mixed-conifer understory communities

  • Malcolm North
  • Brian Oakley
  • Rob Fiegener
  • Andrew Gray
  • Michael Barbour


Sierra Nevada forests have high understory species richness yet we do not know which site factors influence herb and shrub distribution or abundance. We examined the understory of an old-growth mixed-conifer Sierran forest and its distribution in relation to microsite conditions. The forest has high species richness (98 species sampled), most of which are herbs with sparse cover and relatively equal abundance. Shrub cover is highly concentrated in discrete patches. Using overstory tree cover and microsite environmental conditions, four habitats were identified; tree cluster, partial canopy, gap, and rock/shallow soil. Herb and shrub species were strongly linked with habitats. Soil moisture, litter depth and diffuse light were the most significant environmental gradients influencing understory plant distribution. Herb cover was most strongly influenced by soil moisture. Shrub cover is associated with more diffuse light, less direct light, and sites with lower soil moisture. Herb richness is most affected by conditions which influence soil moisture. Richness is positively correlated with litter depth, and negatively correlated with direct light and shrub cover. Disturbance or management practices which change forest floor conditions, shallow soil moisture and direct light are likely to have the strongest effect on Sierran understory abundance and richness.


California NMS ordination Patch Plant community Teakettle Experimental Forest Understory diversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alaback, P.B. 1982Dynamics of understory biomass in Sitka spruce-western hemlock forests of Southeast AlaskaEcology6319321948Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous 1993. Soil survey of the Sierra National Forest area, California. USDA Forest Service Publication, Clovis, CA, 413 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R.C., Louckes, O.L., Swain, A.M. 1969Herbaceous response to canopy cover, light intensity and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forestsEcology50255263Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M.A., Graham, R.C., Alyanakian, G.J., Martynn, D.Z. 1995Late summer water status of soils and weathered bedrock in a giant sequoia groveSoil Sci160415422Google Scholar
  5. Arkley, R.J. 1981Soil moisture use by mixed conifer forests in a summer-dry climateSoil Sci. Am. J45423427Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, M.G., Berg, N.H., Kittel, G.F., Kunz, M.E. 1991Snowpack and the distribution of a major vegetation ecotone in the Sierra Nevada of CaliforniaJ. Biogeogr18141149Google Scholar
  7. Barbour, M.G., Minnich, R.A. 1999

    Californian upland forests and woodlands

    Barbour, M.G.Billings, W.D. eds. North American Terrestrial Vegetation2Cambridge University PressNew York161201
    Google Scholar
  8. Beals, E.W. 1984Bray–Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological dataAdv. Ecol. Res141155Google Scholar
  9. Bress, P.E., Wensel, L.C. 1966Aspect transformation in site productivity researchJ. Forest64691Google Scholar
  10. Bonnicksen, T.M., Stone, E.C. 1982Reconstruction of pre-settlement giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest community using the aggregation approachEcology6311341148Google Scholar
  11. Bouldin J.R. (1999). Twentieth-century changes in forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Davis, CA, 113.Google Scholar
  12. Brandani, A., Hartshorn, G.S., Orians, G.H. 1988Internal heterogeneity of gaps and species richness in Costa Rican tropical wet forestJ. Trop. Ecol499119Google Scholar
  13. Breiman, L., Freidman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J. 1984Classification and Regression TreesChapman & HallNew York483Google Scholar
  14. Carson, W.P., Pickett, S.T.A. 1990Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community.Ecology71226238Google Scholar
  15. Davis F.W. and Stoms M. 1996. Sierran vegetation: a gap analysis. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. II. University of California, Davis, CA, Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37, pp. 671–690.Google Scholar
  16. De’ath, G. 2002Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species environment relationshipsEcology8311051117Google Scholar
  17. Dufrêne, M., Legendre, P. 1997Species assemblages and indicators species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approachEcol. Monogr67345366Google Scholar
  18. Fiegener, R. 2002Influence of sampling intensity on the fire history of an oldgrowth Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest M.Sc ThesisUniversity of CaliforniaDavis CA63Google Scholar
  19. Frelich, L.E., Machado, J.-L., Reich, P.B. 2003Fine-scale environmental variation and structure of understorey plant communities in two old-growth pine forestsJ. Ecol9283293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrison, G.A. 1949Uses and modifications for the “moosehorn” crown closure estimatorJ. Forest4773745Google Scholar
  21. Gray, A.N., Spies, T.A. 1995Water content measurement in decayed wood and forest soils using time domain reflectometryCan J. Forest Res25376385Google Scholar
  22. Gray, A.N., Spies, T.A., Ester, M.J. 2002Microclimate and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forestsCan. J. Forest Res32332343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimes, J.P. 2002Declining plant diversity: empty niches or functional shifts?J Vegetat. Sci13457460Google Scholar
  24. Halpern, C.B. 1988Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communitiesEcology6917031715Google Scholar
  25. Halpern, C.B. 1989Early successional patterns of forest species: interactions of life history traits and disturbanceEcology70704720Google Scholar
  26. Halpern, C.B., Spies, T.A. 1995Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific NorthwestEcol. Appl5913934Google Scholar
  27. Harmon, M.E. 1989Effects of bark fragmentation on plant succession on conifer logs in the Picea-Tsuga Forests of Olympic National Park, WashingtonAm. Midland Natural121112124Google Scholar
  28. Henry, M., Stevens, H., Carson, W.P. 2002Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversityEcol. Lett5420426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hickman, J.C. eds. 1993The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of CaliforniaUniversity of California PressBerkeley, CA1400Google Scholar
  30. Hoffman, M.T., Midgley, G.F., Cowling, R.M. 1994Plant richness is natively related to energy availability in semi-arid southern AfricaBiodiversity Lett23538Google Scholar
  31. Hubbert, K.R., Beyers, J.L., Graham, R.C. 2001Roles of weathered bedrock and soil in seasonal water relations of Pinus Jeffreyi and Arctostaphylos patulaCan. J. Forest Res3119471957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maser C., Cline S., Cromack K. Jr., Trappe J. and Hansen E. 1988. What we know about large trees that fall to the forest floor. From the forest to the sea: a story of fallen trees. USDA Forest Service PNW-GTR-229, 56 pp.Google Scholar
  33. McCune, B., Grace, J.B. 2002Analysis of ecological communitiesMjM Software DesignGleneden Beach, OR300Google Scholar
  34. Minnich, R.A., Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H., Fernau, R.F. 1995Sixty years of change in Californian conifer forests of the San Bernardino MountainsConserv. Biol9902914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moody, A., Meentemeyer, R.K. 2001Environmental factors influencing spatial patterns of shrub diversity in chaparral, Santa Ynez Mountains, CaliforniaJ. Vegetat. Sci124152Google Scholar
  36. Moore, B.M., Lee, B.G., Davey, S.M. 1991A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information systemEnviron. Manage155971Google Scholar
  37. North, M., Chen, J., Oakley, B., Song, B., Rudnicki, M., Gray, A., Innes, J. 2004Forest stand structure and pattern of old-growth western hemlock/Douglas-fir and mixed-conifer forestsForest Sci50299310Google Scholar
  38. North M., Hurteau M., Figiener R., Barbour M. (in press). Fire and El Niño influences on tree recruitment varies by species in Sierran mixed conifer. Forest Sci.Google Scholar
  39. North, M., Oakley, B., Chen, J., Erickson, H., Gray, A., Izzo, A., Johnson, D., Ma, S., Marra, J., Meyer, M., Purcell, K., Roath, B., Rambo, T., Rizzo, D., Schowalter, T. 2002Vegetation and ecological characteristics of mixed-conifer and red-fir forests at the Teakettle Experimental ForestUSDA Forest Service PSW-GTR-186Albany, CA52Google Scholar
  40. Oliver, C.D., Larson, B.C. 1996Forest Stand Dynamics, Updated editionJohn Wiley & Sons IncNew York520Google Scholar
  41. Pausas, J.G. 1994Species richness patterns in the understory of Pyrenean Pinus sylvestris forestJ. Vegetat. Sci5517524Google Scholar
  42. Pausas, J.G., Austin, M.P. 2001Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environmentsJ. Vegetat. Sci12153166Google Scholar
  43. Potter, D.A. 1998Forested communities of the upper montane in the central and southern Sierra NevadaUSDA Forest Service, PSW-GTR-169Albany, CA319Google Scholar
  44. Richerson, P.J., Lum, K.L. 1980Patterns of species diversity in California: relations to weather and topographyAm. Natural116504536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Royce, E.B., Barbour, M.G. 2001Mediterranean climate effects, I Conifer water use across a Sierra Nevada ecotone.Am. J. Bot88911918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Royce, E.B., Barbour, M.G. 2001Mediterranean climate effects, II Conifer growth phenology across a Sierra Nevada ecotone.Am. J. Bot88919932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rundel, P.W., Parson, D.J., Gordon, D.T. 1988

    Montane and subapline vegetation of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges

    Barbour, M.G.Major, J. eds. Terrestrial Vegetation of California2California Native Plant SocietySacramento559599
    Google Scholar
  48. Shevock J.R. 1996. Status of rare and endemic plants. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options, vol. II. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildlands Resources Center Report No. 37, pp. 691–709.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner C.N. and Chang C. 1996. Fire regimes, past and present. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options, vol. II. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildlands Resources Center Report No. 37, pp. 1041– 1070.Google Scholar
  50. Vayssieres, M.P., Plant, R.E., Allen-Diaz, B.H. 2000Classification trees: an alternative nonparametric approach for predicting species distributionsJ. Vegetat. Sci11679694Google Scholar
  51. Vila, M., Sardans, J. 1999Plant competition in Mediterra-nean-type vegetationJ. Vegetat. Sci10281294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm North
    • 1
  • Brian Oakley
    • 2
  • Rob Fiegener
    • 3
  • Andrew Gray
    • 4
  • Michael Barbour
    • 3
  1. 1.Sierra Nevada Research Center, PSW Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceDavisUSA
  2. 2.College of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental HorticultureUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  4. 4.Forest Inventory and Analysis, PNW Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations