Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 176, Issue 2, pp 275–285 | Cite as

Analysis of interactions between the invasive tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and the native black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)

  • Lara J. Call
  • Erik. T. Nilsen
Article

Abstract

Invasive exotic plants can persist and successfully spread within ecosystems and negatively affect the recruitment of native species. The exotic invasive Ailanthus altissima and the native Robinia pseudoacacia are frequently found in disturbed sites and exhibit similar growth and reproductive characteristics, yet each has distinct functional roles such as allelopathy and nitrogen fixation, respectively. A four-month full additive series in the greenhouse was used to analyze the intraspecific and interspecific interference between these two species. In the greenhouse experiment, the inverse of the mean total biomass (g) response per plant for each species was regressed on the density of each species and revealed that the performance of the plants was significantly reduced by interspecific interference and not by intraspecific interference (p < 0.05). Other biomass traits such as root dry weight, shoot dry weight, stem dry weight, and leaf dry weight were also negatively affected by interspecific interference. Competition indices such as Relative Yield Total and Relative Crowding Coefficient suggested that A. altissima was the better competitor in mixed plantings. Ailanthus altissima consistently produced a larger above ground and below ground relative yield while R. pseudoacacia generated a larger aboveground relative yield in high density mixed species pots.

Keywords

Full additive design Functional types Interference Plant competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazzaz, F.A. 1986Life history of colonizing plants; some demographic, genetic, and physiological featuresMooney, HA.Drake, JA. eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and HawaiiSpringer-VerlagNew York, New York, USA96110Google Scholar
  2. Boring, L.R., Swank, W.T. 1984Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in regenerating black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L) standsForest Science30528537Google Scholar
  3. Bossard, C.C., Randall, J.M., Hoshovosky, M.C. 2000Invasive plants of California’s WildlandsUniversity of California PressBerkley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  4. Brizicky, G.K. 1962The Genera of Simaroubaceae and Burseraceae in the Southeastern United StatesJournal of the Arnold ArboretumXLIII179180Google Scholar
  5. Brouwer, R. 1962Distribution of dry matter in the plantNetherlands Journal of Agricultural Science10361376Google Scholar
  6. Cahill, J.F., Casper, B.B. 2000Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and below ground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowgroundOikos90311320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell, M.M., Richards, J.H., Manwaring, J.H., Eissenstat, D.M. 1987Rapid shifts in phosphate acquisition show direct competition between neighboring plantsNature327615616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Call, L.J., Nilsen, E.T. 2003Analysis of Spatial Patterns and Spatial Association between the Invasive Tree-of-Heaven (Ail- anthus altissima) and the Native Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)American Midland Naturalist150114Google Scholar
  9. Casper, B.B., Jackson, R.B. 1997Plant competition undergroundAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics28545570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin, F.S.III. 1980The mineral nutrition of wild plantsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics11233260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, A.G. 1935The effects of black locust on associated species with special references to forest treesEcological Monographs53760Google Scholar
  12. Connolly, J. 1987On the use of response models in mixture experimentsOecologia7295103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connolly, J., Wayne, P., Bazzaz, F.A. 2001Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions? The American Naturalist157107125Google Scholar
  14. D’Antonio, C.M., Vitousek, P.M. 1992Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global changeAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics236387Google Scholar
  15. Davies, P.A. 1943The root system of Ailanthus altissimaTransactions of the Kentucky Academy of Science113335Google Scholar
  16. De Wit, C.T. 1960On competition Evolutionary Monographs 7Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen 666182Google Scholar
  17. De Wit, C.T., Bergh, J.P. 1965Competition between herbage plantsNetherlands Journal of Agricultural Science13212221Google Scholar
  18. Donald, C.M. 1958The interaction of competition for light and for nutrientsAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research9421435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dzwonko, Z., Loster, S. 1997Effects of dominant trees and anthropogenic disturbances on species richness and floristic composition of secondary communities in southern PolandJournal of Applied Ecology34861870Google Scholar
  20. Firbank, L.G., Watkinson, A.R. 1985On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plantsJournal of Applied Ecology22503517Google Scholar
  21. Firbank, L.G., Watkinson, A.R. 1990On the effects of competition: from monocultures to mixturesGrace, J.B.Tilman, D. eds. Perspectives on Plant Competition.Academic PressNew York, New York, USA165192Google Scholar
  22. Gaudet, C.L., Keddy, P.A. 1988Acomparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traitsNature334242243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graves, W.R. 1990Stratification not required for tree-of heaven seed germinationTree Planter ’s Notes411012Google Scholar
  24. Grime, J.P. 1977Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theoryThe American Naturalist11111691194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper, J.L. 1977The Population Biology of PlantsAcademic PressNew York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Heisey, R.M. 1990Evidence for allelopathy by tree-of-heavenJournal of Chemical Ecology1620392055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heisey, R.M. 1996Identification of an allelopathic compound from Ailanthus altissima and characterization of its herbicidal activityAmerican Journal of Botany83192200Google Scholar
  28. Hooper, D.U., Vitousek, , P.M.,  1997The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processesScience2773021305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, S.Y. 1979 Ailanthus Arnoldia392950Google Scholar
  30. Illick, J.S., Brouse, E.F. 1926The Ailanthus tree in PennsylvaniaPennsylvania Department of Forests and Water Bulletin38129Google Scholar
  31. Kira, T., Ogawa, H., Hozumi, K., Koyama, H., Yoda, K. 1956Intraspecific competition among higher plants. V. Supplementary notes on the C-D effectJournal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University D7114Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence, J.G., Colwell, A., Sexton, O.J. 1991The ecological impact of allelopathy in Ailanthus altissima. (Simaroubaceae)American Journal of Botany78948958Google Scholar
  33. Massimino, D., Andre, M., Richaud, C., Daguenet, J., Massimino, J., Vivoli, J. 1981The effect of a day at low irradiance of a maize cropPhysiologia Plantarum51150155Google Scholar
  34. Mergen, F. 1959A toxic principle in the leaves of AilanthusBotanical Gazette1213236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mooney, H.A., Drake, J.A. 1989Biological Invasions: a SCOPE Program OverviewMooney, H.A.Drake, J.A. eds. Biological Invasions.John Wiley and SonsNew York491508Google Scholar
  36. Pan, E., Bassuk, N. 1985Effects of soil type and compaction on the growth of Ailanthus altissima seedlingsJournal of Environmental Horticulture3158162Google Scholar
  37. Pan, E., Bassuk, N. 1986Establishment and distribution of Ailanthus altissima in the urban environmentJournal of Environmental Horticulture414Google Scholar
  38. Rejmanek, M., Richardson, D.M. 1996What attributes make some plant species more invasive?Ecology7716551661Google Scholar
  39. Sadhu, R.N., Kaul, V. 1989Seed-coat dormancy in Robinia pseudoacaciaIndian Forester115483487Google Scholar
  40. Schwartz, M.W., Brigham, C.A., Hocksema, K.G., Millls, M.H., Mangem, P.J. 2000Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecologyOecologia122297305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shinozaki, K., Kira, T. 1956Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VIILogistic theory of the C-D effect. Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University Series D,73572Google Scholar
  42. Snaydon, R.W. 1991Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?Journal of Applied Ecology28930946Google Scholar
  43. Spitters, C.J.T. 1983An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effectsNetherlands Journal of Agricultural Science31111Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, S.C., Weiner, J.B. 1989Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populationsOecologia80349355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vitousek, P.M., Walker, L.R. 1989Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystemeffectsEcological Monographs59247265Google Scholar
  46. Vitousek, P.M. 1992Global environmental change: an introductionAnnual Review of Ecological Systematics23114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiner, J. 1985Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plantsEcology66743752Google Scholar
  48. Weiner, J. 1986How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populationsEcology6714251427Google Scholar
  49. Weiner, , J.,  1990Asymmetric competition in plant populationsTrends in Ecology and Evolution5360364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weiner, J., Wright D., B., Castro, S. 1997Symmetry of below- ground competition between Kochia scoparia individualsOikos798591Google Scholar
  51. White, D.L., Haines, B.L., Boring, L.R. 1988Litter decomposition in southern Appalachian black locust and pine-hardwood stands: litter quality and nitrogen dynamicsCanadian Journal of Forest Resources185463Google Scholar
  52. Willey, R.W., Heath, S.B. 1969The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yieldAdvances in Agronomy21281321Google Scholar
  53. Wilson, J.B. 1988Shoot competition and root competitionJournal of Applied Ecology25279296Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, S.D., Tilman, D. 1993Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilizationEcology74599611Google Scholar
  55. Young, S.A, Young, C.G. 1992Seeds of woody plants in North AmericaDioscorides PressOregon, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations