Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Learning Can’t Occur in Chaos:” A Critical Policy Discourse Analysis of No Excuses Charter School Websites

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This critical policy discourse analysis examines how No Excuses charter schools communicate their school goals and environments, and how they represent and portray their current and prospective students in online materials. We also aim to understand how the No Excuses paradigm has evolved and how, if at all, it is currently represented by these charter networks. We focus on whether and how the discourse in these materials may reflect deficit perspectives or contain language that shapes the construction of students and their families as policy targets, and thus create discourses that may ultimately be harmful to racially-minoritized students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, E. J., & Tolbert, A. R. (2019). Advancing social justice with policy discourse analysis. In K. K. Strunk & L. A. Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 137–149). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2010). Inputs and impacts in charter schools: KIPP Lynn. American Economic Review, 100(2), 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2012). Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 837–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends, M. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, A. J. (2017). Personalized learning in high technology charter schools. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 521–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, A. J. (2021). How distributed leadership facilitates technology integration: A case study of “pilot teachers.” Teachers College Record, 123(7), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeforth, J. C. (2021). “This isn’t who we are”: A critical discourse analysis of school and district leaders’ responses to racial violence. Journal of School Leadership, 31(1–2), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. C. (1999). No excuses: Seven principals of low-income schools who set the standard for high achievement. Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T. K., & Donnor, J. K. (2015). Critical race theory and the proliferation of US charter schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(1), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A., Hitt, C., Kisida, B., & Mills, J. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11(2), 209–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). America’s public schools: Choice is a panacea. The Brookings Review, 8(3), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Heller, B. (2017). Raising more than test scores. Education Next, Winter, 2017. retrieved from http://educationnext.org/raising-more-than-test-scores-noble-charter-no-excuses/

  • Ellison, B. S., & Iqtadar, S. (2020). A qualitative research synthesis of the “No Excuses” charter school model. Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820917362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (2016). Schools that accept ‘no excuses’ from students are not helping them. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/08/11/schools-that-accept-no-excuses-from-students-are-not-helping-them/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.03b2d21b024c

  • Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509773.pdf

  • Golann, J. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a “No Excuses” school. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golann, J. W. (2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkits shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golann, J. W. (2021). Scripting the moves: Culture and control in a" no-excuses" charter school. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golann, J. W., & Torres, A. C. (2020). Do no-excuses disciplinary practices promote success? Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(4), 617–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. (2016). Beyond the viral video: Inside educators’ emotional debate about ‘no excuses’ discipline. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2016/3/12/11208366/untitled

  • Han, E. S., & Keefe, J. (2020). The impact of charter school competition on student achievement of traditional public schools after 25 years: Evidence from national district-level panel data. Journal of School Choice, 14(3), 429–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J. R., & MacDonald, J. A. (2002). Locational decisions of charter schools: Probing the market metaphor. Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), 962–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, L. E. (2016). Race and racelessness in CMO marketing: Exploring charter management organizations’ racial construction and its implications. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, H. (2016). Selling schools: Marketing and recruitment strategies in New Orleans. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, S. (2021). Top Chicago charter school network admits a racist past. WBEZ Chicago. https://www.wbez.org/stories/top-chicago-charter-school-admits-a-racist-past/ebd3c82c-af3b-4320-befc-d7f565acc453

  • Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T. T., Moser, M., & Henig, J. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, B. (2009). No excuses: A critique of the Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP) within charter schools in the USA. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7(2), 126–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, R., Bowen, M., Demeritt, A., McCullough, M., Haimson, J., & Gill, B. (2012). Learning from charter school management organizations: Strategies for student behavior and teacher coaching. Mathematica Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez Kershen, J., Weiner, J. M., & Torres, C. (2018). Control as care: How teachers in “no excuses” charter schools position their students and themselves. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(3–4), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losen, D. J., & Gillespie, J. (2012). Opportunities suspended: The disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.

  • Losen, D. J., Keith, M. A., Hodson, C. L., & Martinez, T. E. (2016). Charter schools, civil rights and school discipline: A comprehensive review. The Civil Rights Project.

  • Lubienski, C. (2005). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 464–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C. (2013). Privatising form or function? Equity, outcomes and influence in American charter schools. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C., Linick, M., & York, J. G. (2012). School marketing in the United States: Demographic representations and dilemmas for educational leaders. In I. Oplatka & J. Hemsley-Brown (Eds.), The management and leadership of educational marketing: Research, practice and applications (Advances in Educational Administration). Emerald Insight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, L. T. S., & Noguera, P. A. (2018). Beyond stigma and stereotypes: An ethnographic study on the effects of school-imposed labeling on Black males in an urban charter school. The Urban Review, 50(3), 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Charter School Authorizers (2021). Charter School Pipeline Analysis. https://www.qualitycharters.org/research/pipeline/analysis/

  • Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, L. A., & Evans, L. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and White flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.3.398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rofes, E., & Stulberg, L. M. (Eds.). (2004). The emancipatory promise of charter schools: Toward a progressive politics of school choice. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2020). Critiquing the corporeal curriculum: Body pedagogies in ‘no excuses’ charter schools. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(10), 1330–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulentic Dowell, M. M., & Bickmore, D. L. (2015). Guest editors’ introduction: The promises of charter schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. (2016). At Success Academy School, a stumble in math and a teacher’s anger on video. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. C. (2016). The uncertainty of high expectations: How principals influence relational trust and teacher turnover in no excuses charter schools. Journal of School Leadership, 26(1), 61–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Charter Schools. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=30

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 349–371). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitoller, F. R., Nguyen, N., & Super, G. (2019). The irony of rigor: ‘No-Excuses’ charter schools at the intersections of race and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. (2012). School choice and the commodification of education: A visual approach to school brochures and websites. Critical Social Policy, 32(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. S., & Carlsen, R. L. (2016). School marketing as a sorting mechanism: A critical discourse analysis of charter school websites. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, USA

    Andrea J. Bingham

  2. University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, USA

    Kristi McCann

Authors
  1. Andrea J. Bingham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristi McCann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea J. Bingham.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bingham, A.J., McCann, K. “Learning Can’t Occur in Chaos:” A Critical Policy Discourse Analysis of No Excuses Charter School Websites. Urban Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00686-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00686-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation