Abstract
This article challenges and explores an after-school literacy tutor program in a semi-urban midwestern state. As after-school programs continue to be widely used across the United States, there is also continued efforts to engage students in continued academic learning after school. Hynes and Sanders (2011) studied the experiences of various racial groups in after-school programs across the United States. They found that African American children were more likely to use after-school programs than White students, and most children participating in after-school programs lived in ‘urban’ (un-defined) areas. They also discovered more options for after-school programs in the Southern region of the United States, which has a larger portion of African American students (After School Alliance, 2009; Hynes and Sanders, 2011).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afterschool Alliance (2009). America after 3PM.: A Snapshot of the African American Community After 3PM.
Afterschool Alliance. (2014). America After 3PM. Afterschool Programs in Demand.
Afterschool Alliance (2021). America After 3PM: Afterschool Programs in Demand. Retrieved from http://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AA3PM-2020/AA3PM-Black-Communities-2020-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic (Eds), Siturated Literacies, p. 7–15. Routledge.
Barton & Hamilton. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2014). Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. Educational Linguistics.
Brown, K. D. (2013). Trouble on my mind: Toward a framework of humanizing critical sociocultural knowledge for teaching and teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16, 316–338.
Cole, M. (2006). The Fifth Dimension: An Afterschool Program Built on Diversity. Russell Sage Foundation.
Cooper, R. L. (1990). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, & Lincoln (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the Case. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dyson, A. H. (2016). Child cultures, Schooling, and Literacy: Global perspectives on composing unique lives. Routledge.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gee, J. P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Gee2/publication/265198323_4_A_Sociocultural_Perspective_on_Opportunity_to_Learn/links/556735eb08aeccd7773784f4/4-A-Sociocultural-Perspective-on-Opportunity-to-Learn.pdf
Gutierrez, K. D., Bien, A. C., Selland, M. K., & Pierce, D. M. (2011). Polylingual and polycultural learning ecologies: Mediating emergent academic literacies for dual language learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(2), 232–261.
Gutierrez, K., & Larson, J. (1994). Language borders: Recitation as hegemonic discourse. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(1), 22–36.
Gutierrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 19–25.
Haddix, M. (2009). Black boys can write: Challenging dominant framings of African American adolescent males in literacy research. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(4), 341–343.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. cambridge university Press.
Hull, G. A., & Moje, E. B. (2012). What is the development of literacy the development of? Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards, 94, 52.
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: a review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 575–611.
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). Connecting schools with out-of-school worlds.Scholarly Commons, pp.32–57.
Hynes, K., & Doyle, E. (2009). Changes in after-school program use: 1995–2005. Population Research Institute Working Paper #0901 Pennsylvania State University.
Hynes, K., & Sanders, F. (2011). Diverging experiences during out-of-school time: The race gap in exposure to after-school programs. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 464–476.
Husband, T., & Kang, G. (2020). Identifying promising literacy practices for Black males in P-12 classrooms: An integrative review. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 16(1), 1–34.
Johnson, L. (2014). Can I come in here? Winston’s discovery of edge-of-school spaces and meaningful literacy engagement. Changing English, 21(3), 201–214.
Kirkland, D. E. (2011). Books like clothes: Engaging young Black men with reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(3), 199–208.
Kirkland, D. (2011b). Listening to echoes: Teaching young Black men literacy and the distraction of ELA standards. Language Arts, 88(5), 373–380.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2005). The evolving role of critical race theory in educational scholarship. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 115–119.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and Applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.
Lee, C. D. (1993). Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre. National Council of Teachers of English.
Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy. Routledge.
Lillis, T. M., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology, and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44.
Morrell, E. (2004). Becoming critical researchers: Literacy and empowerment for urban youth. Peter Lang.
Morrell, E. (2006, March). Critical participatory action research and the literacy achievement of ethnic minority groups. In National Reading Conference Yearbook (Vol. 55, pp. 1–18).
Morrell, E., & Duncan-Andrade, J. M. (2002). Promoting academic literacy with urban youth through engaging hip-hop culture. English journal, 88–92.
Nasir, N. I. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between cultural and domain knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240.
Pacheco, M. B., & Smith, B. E. (2015). Across languages, modes, and identities: Bilingual adolescents’ multimodal code meshing in the literacy classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 38(3), 292–312.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press.
Stake, R., & Mabry, L. (1995). Case study for a deep understanding of teaching. In Allan Ornstein, editor, Teaching: Theory and Practice Allyn & Bacon. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995).
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (2009). The future of social literacies. In M. Baynham, & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The Future of Literacy Studies. Palgrave Advances in Lingustics.
Street, B. (2015). Learning to read from a social practice view: Ethnography, schooling, and adult learning. Prospects, 46, pp. 335–344.
Street, B., Lea, M. R., & Lillis, T. (2015). Revisiting the question of transformation and academic literacies: The ethnographic imperative. In T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M. R. Lea, & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice (pp. 383–390). Parlor Press.
Tatum, A. W. (2007). Building the textual lineages of African American male adolescents. In K. Beers, R. Probst, & L. Rief (Eds.), Adolescent literacy: Turning promise into practice (pp. 81–85). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Tatum, A. W. (2008). Toward a more anatomically complete model of literacy instruction: A focus on African American male adolescents and texts. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 155–280.
Tatum, A., & Muhammad, G. E. (2012). African American males and literacy development in contexts that are characteristically urban. Urban Education, 47(2), 434–463.
Tatum, A., Johnson, A., & McMillon, D. (2021). The state of Black male literacy research, 1999–2020. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70, o. 129–151.
Tomai, E., & Forbus, K. D. (2007). Narrative presentation and meaning. Retrieved from https://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/papers/Files/QRG_Dist_Files/QRG_2007/tomai07narrative-final.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
WI Guest Author (2021). Lack of access to after-school programs frustrates Black parents: Survey. The Washington Informer Retrieved from https://www.washingtoninformer.com/lack-of-access-to-after-school-programs-frustrates-black-parents-survey/
Willis, R. (2019). The use of composite narratives to present interview findings. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 471–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Harrison, D. De-Centering Deficit Frameworks and Approaches: The Mentor/Mentee Relationship in an Afterschool Tutoring Program. Urban Rev 55, 417–432 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00655-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00655-8