“It’s Pretty Essential”: A Critical Race Counter-Narrative of Faculty of Color Understandings of Diversity and Equity in Doctoral Admissions

Abstract

Using a short story fiction counter-narrative, this critical race study examines how faculty of color within higher education and student affairs doctoral-granting programs bring critical epistemologies to their decision-making in the student admissions process and work to decolonize the academy despite neoliberal pressures. Faculty of color depart from current accounts of faculty decision-making in doctoral education in two key ways—by disregarding standardized measures of success and by considering diversity throughout the entire admissions process—leading us to important insights about how faculty of color differ from white faculty in their perception of and in their emphasis on diversity, equity, and justice in the admissions process. The implications are both broad and specific for creating dynamically diverse campus climates in an era of persistent challenges to affirmative action. The findings speak to the ways that those concerned with educational diversity and equity can support diversity and equity efforts in a neoliberal, color-blind environment. In a world defined by such policy and practice and a country that determines options and opportunity based on race, this study centers the voices of faculty of color in their institutions and analyzes how identity and institutional logics influence behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Latinx is a gender-neutral racial/ethnic identifier for participants who are from or are descendants of Latin American countries.

References

  1. ACPA/NASPA. (2010). Envisioning the future of student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agosto, V., Karanxha, Z., & Bellara, A. (2014). Battling inertia in educational leadership: CRT praxis for race conscious dialogue. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.885420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aguirre, A. (2005). The personal narrative as academic storytelling: A Chicano’s search for presence and voice in academe. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,18(2), 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Attiyeh, G., & Attiyeh, R. (1997). Testing for bias in graduate school admissions. Journal of Human Resources,32, 524–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education,39, 363–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barone, T. (2007). A return to the gold standard?: Questioning the future of narrative construction as educational research. Qualitative Inquiry,13(4), 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berrey, E. (2015). The enigma of diversity: The language of race and the limits of racial justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2009). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonilla-Silva, E., & Dietrich, D. (2011). The sweet enchantment of color-blind racism in obamerica. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,634(1), 190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D.. Cambridge, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Butin, D. W. (2001). If this is resistance I would hate to see domination: Retrieving Foucault’s notion of resistance within educational research. Educational Studies,32(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Butner, B. K., Burley, H., & Marbley, A. F. (2000). Coping with the unexpected: Black faculty at predominantly White institutions. Journal of Black Studies,30(3), 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabrera, N. (2018). Where is the racial theory in critical race theory?: A constructive criticism of the crits. The Review of Higher Education,42(1), 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caulley, D. N. (2008). Making qualitative research reports less boring: The techniques of writing creative nonfiction. Qualitative Inquiry,14(3), 424–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two doctoral researchers. Qualitative Research,14(5), 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delgado-Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). The apartheid of knowledge in the academy: The struggle over “legitimate” knowledge for faculty of color. Equity and Excellence in Education,35, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixson, A. D., Rousseau Anderson, C. K., & Donner, J. K. (2017). Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. DuBois, W. E. B. (2005). The souls of Black folk. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eddy, P. L., & Gaston-Gayles, J. L. (2008). New faculty on the block: Issues of stress and support. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,17(1–2), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Espino, M. M. (2012). Seeking the “truth” in the stories we tell: The role of critical race epistemology in higher education research. The Review of Higher Education,36(1), 31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Freeley, T. H., Williams, V. M., & Wise, T. J. (2005). Testing the predictive validity of the GRE exam on communication graduate student success: A case study at the University of Buffalo. Communication Quarterly,53(2), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fries-Britt, S., & Kelly, B. (2005). Retaining each other: Narratives of two African American women in the academy. The Urban Review,37(3), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garces, L. M. (2012). Racial diversity, legitimacy, and the citizenry: The impact of affirmative action bans on graduate school enrollment. The Review of Higher Education Fall Supplement,36(1), 93–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garces, L. M. (2013). Understanding the impact of affirmative action bans in different graduate fields of study. American Education Research Journal,50(2), 251–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garces, L. M., & Jayakumar, U. M. (2014). Dynamic diversity: Toward a contextual understanding of critical mass. Educational Researcher,43(3), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Giroux, H. (2015). Democracy in crisis, the specter of authoritarianism, and the future of higher education. Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs,1(1), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griffin, K. A., Bennett, J. C., & Harris, J. (2011a). Analyzing gender differences in Black faculty marginalization through a sequential mixed-methods design. In K. A. Griffin & S. D. Museus (Eds.), Special issue: Using mixed-methods approaches to study intersectionality in higher education, Issue 151 New Directions for Institutional Research (pp. 45–61). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  31. Griffin, K. A., Pifer, M. J., Humphrey, J. R., & Hazelwood, A. M. (2011b). (Re)defining departure: Exploring Black professors’ experiences with and responses to racism and racial climate. American Journal of Education,117, 495–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guinier, L. (2003). Admissions rituals as political acts: Guardians at the gates of our democratic ideals. Harvard Law Review,117, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guinier, L. (2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haag, P. (2005). Is collegiality code for hating ethnic, racial, and female faculty at tenure time? The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education,2005, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hagedorn, L. S., & Nora, A. (1996). Rethinking admissions criteria in graduate and professional programs. New Directions for Institutional Research,92(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hamer, J. F., & Lang, C. (2015). Race, structural violence, and the neoliberal university: The challenges of inhabitation. Critical Sociology,41(6), 897–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hartley, M., & Morphew, C. (2008). What’s being sold and to what end? A content analysis of college viewbooks. Journal of Higher Education,79(6), 671–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holvino, E. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work and Organization,17(3), 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hooks, B. (2009). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., & Ramirez, R. R. (2010). Overview of race and Hispanic origin. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jones, S. R., Arminio, J., & Torres, V. (2014). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jones, S. R., Kim, Y. C., & Skendall, K. C. (2012). (Re-)framing authenticity: Considering multiple social identities using autoethnographic and intersectional approaches. The Journal of Higher Education,83(5), 698–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Joseph, J., & Holley, K. A. (2013). Increasing diversity in doctoral education: Implications for theory and practice: New directions for higher education, number 163 J-B HE single issue higher education 163 (163rd ed.). US: Jossey Bass Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kelly, B. T., & McCann, K. (2013). Women faculty of color: Success stories from the margins. Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Global Achievement Gap,1, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin,127(1), 162–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (2017). Toward a critical race theory of education. In A. D. Dixson, C. K. Rousseau, & J. K. Donnor (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (pp. 11–31). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Levinson, B. A. U., Gross, J. P. K., Link, J., & Hanks, C. (2011). Forerunners and foundation builders: Origins of a Western critical social theory tradition. In B. Levinson (Ed.), Beyond critique: Exploring critical social theories and Education (pp. 25–50). London, UK: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu, A. (2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of U.S. higher education. Higher Education,62(1), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McCann, K. I. (2014). Master’s students’ experiences in a graduate preparation program: Multicultural competency and social justice curriculum (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loyola University Chicago, IL.

  52. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Medina, C., & Luna, G. (2000). Narratives from Latina professors in higher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly,31(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Morrison, T., & Morrison, M. (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of the predictive validity of the quantitative and verbal components of the graduate record examination with graduate grade point average representing the criterion of graduate success. Educational and Psychological Measurement,55(2), 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. National Center for Educational Statistics [NCES]. (2017). Doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. See Digest of Education Statistics 2017, table 324.25. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_324.25.asp.

  56. National Center for Educational Statistics [NCES]. (2018). Bachelor’s, Master’s and doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions by field of study: Selected years, 1970–71 through 2015–2016. See Digest of Education Statistics 2017, table 318.20. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_318.20.asp.

  57. Nespor, J. (2000). Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry,6(4), 546–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Okahana, H., & Zhou, E. (2018). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2007–2017. Washington DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Osei-Kofi, N., Torres, L. E., & Lui, J. (2013). Practices of whiteness: Racialization in college admissions viewbooks. Race Ethnicity and Education,16(3), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Patel, L. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Patitu, C. L., & Hinton, K. G. (2003). The experiences of African American women faculty and administrators in higher education: Has anything changed? New Directions for Student Services,2003(104), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Piper, H., & Sikes, P. (2010). All teachers are vulnerable but especially gay teachers: Using composite fictions to protect research participants in pupil-teacher sex-related research. Qualitative Inquiry,16(7), 566–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education,8(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Poon, O. A., & Segoshi, M. S. (2018). The racial mascot speaks: A critical race discourse analysis of Asian Americans and Fisher v. University of Texas. Review of Higher Education,42(1), 235–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Poon, O. A., Segoshi, M., Tang, L., Surla, K., & Squire, D. (Forthcoming). Asian Americans, affirmative action, and the political economy of racism: A multidimensional model of raceclass frames. Harvard Educational Review.

  66. Pope, R. L., Mueller, J. A., & Reynolds, A. L. (2009). Looking back and moving forward: Future directions for diversity research in student affairs. Journal of College Student Development,50(6), 640–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Posselt, J. R. (2013a). The merit-diversity paradox in doctoral admissions: Examining situated judgment in faculty decision making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

  68. Posselt, J. R. (2013b). Four homophilies in graduate admissions: Patterns and dynamics of faculty tastes. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Association for the Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO.

  69. Posselt, J. R. (2014). Applicant evaluation as admissions practice: A socio-cognitive framework of faculty judgment in U.S. doctoral admissions. Handbook of Higher Education Admissions Policy and Practice.

  70. Posselt, J. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Posselt, J. R. (2018). Trust networks: A new perspective on pedigree and the ambiguities of admissions. Journal of Higher Education,41(4), 497–521.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sedlacek, W. E. (2004). Beyond the Big Test: Noncognitive Assessment in Higher Education. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Solórzano, D., & Yosso, T. (2002). A critical race counterstory of race, racism, and affirmative action. Equity and Excellence in Education,35(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Squire, D. (Forthcoming). The neoliberal and neoracist tendencies of international doctoral student of color admissions in graduate education programs. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education.

  75. Squire, D. D. (2015). Shifting narratives in doctoral admissions: Faculty of color understandings of diversity, equity, and justice in a neoliberal context (Doctoral dissertation, 1972). Retrieved from http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1972.

  76. Stake, J. E. (2006). Minority admissions to law school: More trouble ahead, and two solutions. St. John’s Law Review,80(1), 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stapleton, L. D. (2014). The unexpected talented tenth: Black d/Deaf students thriving within the margins. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, IA.

  78. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist,52(6), 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Steinberg, J. (2002). The gatekeepers: Inside the admissions process of a premier college. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Stewart, D.-L., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2018). The high impact of [whiteness] on trans* students in postsecondary education. Equity & Excellence in Education,51(2), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Stockdill, B. C., & Danico, M. Y. (2012). The ivory tower paradox: Higher education as a site of oppression and resistance. In B. C. Stockdill & M. Y. Danico (Eds.), Transforming the ivory tower: Challenging racism and homophobia in the academy (pp. 1–30). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Stricker, L. J., & Bejar, I. I. (2004). Test difficulty and stereotype threat on the GRE general Test. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,34(3), 563–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02561.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Thomas, G. D., & Hollenshead, C. (2001). Resisting from the margins: The coping strategies of Black women and other women of color faculty members at a research university. The Journal of Negro Education,70(3), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Tierney, W. G., & Clemens, R. F. (2011). Qualitative research and public policy: The challenges of relevance and trustworthiness. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 57–84). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Turner, C. S. V. (2003). Incorporation and marginalization in the academy: From border toward center for faculty of color? Journal of Black Studies,34(1), 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Vaseleck, J. (1994). Stop working and put down your pencils: The use and misuse of standardized admission tests. Journal of College and University Law, 20(4), 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Vickers, M. H. (2010). The creation of fiction to share other truths and different viewpoints: A creative journey and an interpretive process. Qualitative Inquiry,16(7), 556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., et al. (2010). The path forward: The future of graduate education in the US. Washington, DC: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & Hessen, D. J. (2005). Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89(5), 696–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Kate Gallagher for all her support and insight in reviewing a prior version of this manuscript. I would also like to thank the University of Denver Interdisciplinary Research Incubator for the Study of (in)Equality (IRISE) for their support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dian D. Squire.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Squire, D.D. “It’s Pretty Essential”: A Critical Race Counter-Narrative of Faculty of Color Understandings of Diversity and Equity in Doctoral Admissions. Urban Rev 52, 173–197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00523-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Graduate education
  • Admissions
  • Critical race theory
  • Faculty of color
  • Diversity
  • Equity