Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Efficacy, Dropout Status, and the Role of In-School Experiences Among Urban, Young Adult School-Leavers and Non-leavers

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High school non-completion remains a stubborn reality in urban communities where low-income people of color are concentrated, putting young adults at risk for long-term economic instability. Research shows that self-efficacy positively affects school outcomes and that in-school experiences influence school completion. However, little is known about the joint effects of self-efficacy and aspects of the school context on school-leaving. This study gathered data from a sample of 200 young adults recruited through a participatory action research project in a low-income, predominantly Latina/o urban community. Using descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, this study examines relationships between academic and general self-efficacy, dropout status (non-leavers, temporary-leavers, and permanent-leavers), and school context. Results showed few differences between temporary- and permanent-leavers, although leavers had lower academic self-efficacy but higher general self-efficacy than non-leavers. Moreover, grades and caring relations with adults explained the difference in self-efficacy by dropout status. This article discusses implications for research and practices on school completion, particularly for young adults living low-income, racially/ethnically minoritized urban communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Racially/ethnically minoritized” to refers to socially and economically marginalized racial and ethnic groups in the U.S.

  2. “Newhope” is a pseudonym.

  3. A "regular job" is one that is reported to the government (not under the table) and where the employee is paid directly by the business in which he or she works (not by a third party, such as an employment agency).

  4. All relevant questions from survey are included in “Appendix”.

  5. The sensitivity of the ANOVA findings was tested using non-parametric tests (i.e., Chi squared analysis, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test), as some of these variables were ordinal and not normally distributed. Similarly, with dichotomous dependent variables (y = 1 or 0), we also examined mean differences using logistic regression. The patterns of results were consistent between the different statistical analyses used.

  6. In preliminary exploratory models (not reported here) where we included each indicator of the school context separately (with control variables and school outcomes) each variable was statistically significant indicating the relevance of the three indicators of the school context examine in this paper for academic self-efficacy (models are available upon request).

  7. Exploratory models, including controls, school outcomes, and each school context dimension separately, indicated that none of the school context measures were statistically significant (models are available upon request).

References

  • Alivernini, F., & Lucidi, F. (2011). Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research,104(4), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • America’s Promise Alliance. (2014). Don’t call them dropouts: Understanding the experiences of young people who leave school before graduation. Washington, DC: America’s Promise Alliance, Center for Promise.

    Google Scholar 

  • America’s Promise Alliance. (2015). Don’t quit on me: What young people who left school say about the power of relationships. Washington, DC: America’s Promise Alliance, Center for Promise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayscue, J. B., & Orfield, G. (2016). Perpetuating separate and unequal worlds of educational opportunity through district lines: School segregation by race and poverty. In P. A. Noguera, J. C. Pierce, & R. Ahram (Eds.), Race, equity, and education : Sixty years from brown (pp. 45–74). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Hornig Fox, J., DePaoli, J. L., Ingram, E. S., & Maushard, M. (2014). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic: Civic Enterprises, Everyone Graduates Center at the School of Education at Johns Hopkins University America’s, Promise Alliance, Alliance for Excellent Education.

  • Balfanz, R., & Letgers, N. (2004). Locating the dropout crisis: Which high schools produce the nation’s dropouts? Where are they located? Who attends them?. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At-Risk, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and section: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist,28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Developments,72(1), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekuis, T. (1995). Unsafe public schools and the risk of dropping out: A longitudinal study of adolescents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Boardman, J. D., & Robert, S. A. (2000). Neightborhood socioeconomic status and perceptions of self-efficacy. Sociological Perspectives,43(1), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist,34(3), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review,15(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J., Stroud, C., & Breiner, H. (2014). Investing in the health and well-being of young adults. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J. (2010). Grades and graduation: A longitudinal risk perspective to identify student dropouts. Journal of Educational Research,103(3), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J., & Sprott, R. (2012). Why tenth graders fail to finish high school: A dropout typology latent class analysis. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,17(3), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, M., Brauckmann, S., Medina, O., Mireles, L., Spain, A., & Fuller, B. (2008). Giving a student voice to California’s dropout crisis. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Berkely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. M. (2016). The making of vulnerable workers: Uncredentialed young adults in postindustrial, urban America. Equity & Excellence in Education,49(3), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. M. (forthcoming). Re-conceptualizing risk and high school non-completion: The case of Latina/o ninth-grade leavers in an urban school. Teachers College Record.

  • Brown, T. M., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2009). School and the co-construction of dropout. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,22(2), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools,40(4), 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods,4(1), 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S. (1996). Dropping out in Ogden City schools: The voices of the students. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. M. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial & Special Education,28(6), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, J. O., Mason, M., & Mennis, J. (2012). Valuing but not liking school: Revisiting the relationship between school attitudes and substance use among urban youth. Education and Urban Society,44(6), 672–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Gregory, A., Huang, F., & Fan, X. (2012). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology,105(1), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record,103(4), 548–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, D. M., Dona, D. P., & Christenson, S. L. (2007). Behaviorally at-risk African American students: The importance of student-teacher relationships for student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology,45(1), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaoli, J. L., Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Atwell, M., & Ingram, E. S. (2017). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic: Civic Enterprises, Everyone Graduates Center at the School of Education at Johns Hopkins University America’s, Promise Alliance, Alliance for Excellent Education.

  • DePaoli, J. L., Hornig Fox, J., Ingram, E. S., Maushard, M., Bridgeland, J. M., & Balfanz, R. (2015). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic: Civic Enterprises, Everyone Graduates Center at the School of Education at Johns Hopkins University America’s, Promise Alliance, Alliance for Excellent Education.

  • Dooley, D. (2003). Unemployment, underemployment and mental health: Conceptualizing employment status as a continuum. American Journal of Community Psychology,32(1/2), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvnjak, A., & Fraser, H. (2013). Targeting the’hard to reach’: Re/producing stigma? Critical and Radical Social Work,1(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., Roeser, R. W., Barber, B. L., & Hernandez-Jozefowicz, D. (1997). The association of school transitions in early adolescence with developmental trajectories through high school. In J. Schulenberg, J. L. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S. M., Barney, C. E., & Bishop, J. W. (2013). The treatment of self-efficacy among psychology and management scholars. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,43(4), 811–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, B. E., & May, L. N. (2013). “Where there is a will, there is an A”: Examining the roles of self-efficacy and self-concept in college students’ current educational attainment and career planning. Social Psychology of Education,16(4), 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Roberts, R. A., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Echoes of Brown [DVD]. New York: The Graduate Center, City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatlin, T. K., & Johnson, M. J. (2017). Two case examples of reaching the hard-to-reach: Low income minority and LGBT individuals. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice,10(3), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, L. J. S., Call, K. T., & Mortimer, J. T. (2001). Global and economic self-efficacy in the educational attainment process. Social Psychology Quarterly,64(2), 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2017a). The condition of education: Children and youth with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2017b). Status and trends in the eduction of racial and ethnic groups: Indicator 14: Retention, suspension, and expulsion. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irizarry, J. G., & Raible, J. (2011). Beginning with El Barrio: Learning from exemplary teachers of latino students. Journal of Latinos & Education,10(3), 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janosz, M., Le Blanc, M., Bernard, B., & Tremblay, R. E. (2000). Predicting different types of school dropouts: A typological approach with two longitudinal samples. Journal of Educational Psychology,92(1), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance,11(2–3), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortering, L. J., & Braziel, P. M. (1999). School dropout from the perspective of former students: Implications for secondary special education programs. Remedial and Special Education,20(2), 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., & Breen, L. (2007). Young people’s perceptions and experiences of leaving high school early: An exploration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,17(5), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology,33(3), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi, M., Sharkey, J., Furlong, M. J., Mayworm, A., Hunnicutt, K., & Vieno, A. (2017). School sense of community, teacher support, and students’ school safety perceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology,60(3–4), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Appliked Psychology,69(2), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International journal of Psychology,40(2), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSpadden McNeil, L., Coppola, E., Radigan, J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Education Policy Analysis Archives,16(3), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, MI: Univeristy of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology,38(1), 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2017). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2017. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neild, R. C. (2009). Falling off track during the transition to high school: What we know and what can be done. The Future of Children,19(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neild, R. C., Balfanz, R., & Herzog, L. (2007). An early warning system. Educational Leadership,65(2), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research,66(4), 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Self perception: International perspectives on individual differences (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Y. A. (2013). The people’s report: The link between structural violence and crime in Wilmington, Delaware. Wlimington, DE: University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peguero, A. A. (2011). Violence, schools, and dropping out: Racial and ethnic disparities in the educational consequence of student victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,26(18), 3753–3772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peguero, A. A., & Shaffer, K. A. (2015). Academic self-efficacy, dropping out, and the significance of inequality. Sociological Spectrum,35(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, Fall,2009, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why student drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4), 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects of children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,73(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist,26(3–4), 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescences. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 71–96). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2015). General and realm-specific self-efficacy: Connections to life functioning. Current Psychology,35(2), 361–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review,46(1), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stata Statistical Software (2015) (Version 14) [Computer software]. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

  • Stearns, E., & Glennie, E. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth & Society,38(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, S., Malchow, A., & Suh, J. (2014). Why did the Black–White dropout gap widen in the 2000s? Educational Research Quarterly,37(4), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research,83(3), 357–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E. (2011). Humiliating ironies and dangerous dignities: A dialectic of school pushout. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE),24(7), 817–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). American Fact Finder. https://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Retrieved 17 October 2014.

  • U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). Earnings and unemployment rates by educational attainment, 2016. https://www.bls.gov/emp/. Retrieved 14 August 2017.

  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehlage, G. G., & Rutter, R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record,87(3), 374–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, D. A., & Riggio, H. R. (2010). Family background and academic achievement: Does self-efficacy mediate outcomes? Social Psychology of Education,13(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The developent of academic self-efficacy. In D. H. Schunk & F. Pajares (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, V. R., Chau, M., Aratani, Y., Schwarz, S. W., & Thampi, K. (2010). A profile of disconnected young adults in 2010. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science,26(1–2), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara M. Brown.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Survey Items

Appendix: Survey Items

Dropout Status

  1. 1.

    Complete this section only if you left school before getting a high school diploma. If you have your diploma, go to the next page.

  2. 2.

    Are you still in high school?

  3. 3.

    If no, do you have a high school diploma?

General Self-Efficacy

  1. 1.

    When unexpected problems occur in my life, I don’t handle them well.

  2. 2.

    I get discouraged when I make a lot of mistakes.

  3. 3.

    If I need help with a problem, I usually know where to get it.

  4. 4.

    I don’t put much effort into the things I do.

  5. 5.

    I can usually handle whatever comes my way.

  6. 6.

    I feel like I can’t control a lot of things in my life.

  7. 7.

    If I really want to learn something, I push myself to learn it, even if it’s difficult.

  8. 8.

    I get discouraged when something is difficult for me to do.

Academic Self-Efficacy

  1. 1.

    I felt certain I could master the skills taught in class during the year.

  2. 2.

    I felt certain I could figure out how to do the most difficult class work.

  3. 3.

    I could do almost all the work in class if I didn’t give up.

  4. 4.

    Even if the work was hard in class, I could learn it.

  5. 5.

    I could do even the hardest work in class if I tried.

School Outcomes

  1. 1.

    In general, which best describes your grades in high school?

  2. 2.

    Have you ever been kept back a grade?

  3. 3.

    Were you ever in special education?

  4. 4.

    Have you ever been suspended from school?

  5. 5.

    Have you ever been expelled from school?

Caring Relations with Adults

  1. 1.

    My teachers cared about me as a person.

  2. 2.

    My teachers cared about me academically.

  3. 3.

    My teachers valued my ideas and opinions.

  4. 4.

    My teachers treated me fairly.

  5. 5.

    Teachers and administrators treated me with respect.

  6. 6.

    I felt comfortable talking to a teacher or administrator if I had a problem.

  7. 7.

    If I made a mistake, teachers and administrators were willing to give me another chance.

Instructional Quality

  1. 1.

    My teachers were willing to help me with my school work.

  2. 2.

    My teachers had high expectations of me.

  3. 3.

    My teachers taught and explained things well so that I understood the material in class.

  4. 4.

    My teachers made learning fun and interesting.

  5. 5.

    My high school prepared me well for college.

School Climate and Safety

  1. 1.

    I got along with teachers and administrators.

  2. 2.

    Most students at my school cared about learning and getting a good education.

  3. 3.

    My teachers knew how to handle student disruptions.

  4. 4.

    Students were disciplined fairly at my school.

  5. 5.

    My high school was a safe and orderly place

  6. 6.

    I got along with other students in school.

  7. 7.

    I felt safe at school.

Demographic and Socioeconomic Indicators

  1. 1.

    Are you still in high school?

  2. 2.

    Are you currently working?

  3. 3.

    If yes, what kind of work do you currently have?

  4. 4.

    Do you rely on any of the following forms of public assistance to get by financially?

  5. 5.

    Currently, how well are you able to meet your financial responsibilities?

  6. 6.

    Age:

  7. 7.

    Gender:

  8. 8.

    Were you born in the U.S.?

  9. 9.

    What is your first language?

  10. 10.

    What is your race/ethnicity?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, T.M., Galindo, C., Quarles, B. et al. Self-Efficacy, Dropout Status, and the Role of In-School Experiences Among Urban, Young Adult School-Leavers and Non-leavers. Urban Rev 51, 816–844 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00508-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00508-3

Keywords

Navigation