The Urban Review

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 648–667 | Cite as

What Facilitates and Supports Political Activism by, and for, Undocumented Students?

Article

Abstract

Historically, undocumented students have been unable to attend public and private institutions of higher education in the United States. Lack of citizenship and/or financial aid precludes many from ever applying to college or other post-secondary institutions. This can create feelings of oppression, stigmatization, and/or inferiority for undocumented youth, who had no say in their ever coming to the United States. In the absence of a sustainable federal law that facilitates higher education attainment for this population, some states have enacted their own permissive policies. The present study utilizes a critical consciousness framework and a constant comparative approach to explore one permissive policy in a focal state. To this end, the authors attempt to answer the question of what motivates undocumented students, through the lens of critical consciousness, to engage in political activism, and what is the role of adult-allies? Findings support and extend our understanding of critical consciousness dimensions, vis-à-vis the revelation of ten themes and subthemes unique to this sample. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are also discussed.

Keywords

DREAMers In-state residency tuition Critical consciousness Higher education Organizing 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1948 [350 B.C.E.]). The politics of Aristotle (P. L. P. Simpson, Trans.). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruno, A. (2010). Unauthorized Alien Students: Issues and” DREAM Act” Legislation. Cornell University ILR School.Google Scholar
  4. Bruno, A. (2013). Unauthorized aliens: Policy options for providing targeted immigration relief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  5. Bruno, A. (2014). Unauthorized aliens in the United States: Policy discussion. Current Politics and Economics of the United States, Canada and Mexico, 16(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, C., & McLean, C. (2002). Ethnic identities, social capital and health inequalities: Factors shaping African-Caribbean participation in local community networks in the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 55(4), 643–657. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00193-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmen, S. A. S., Domínguez, M., Greene, A. C., Mendoza, E., Fine, M., Neville, H. A., et al. (2015). Revisiting the collective in critical consciousness: Diverse sociopolitical wisdoms and ontological healing in sociopolitical development. The Urban Review, 47(5), 824–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christens, B. D., & Kirshner, B. (2011). Taking stock of youth organizing: An interdisciplinary perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 27–41. doi: 10.1002/cd.309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christens, B. D., Winn, L. T., & Duke, A. M. (2016). Empowerment and critical consciousness: A conceptual cross-fertilization. Adolescent Research Review, 1(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeAngelo, L., Schuster, M. T., & Stebleton, M. J. (2016). California DREAMers: Activism, identity, and empowerment among undocumented college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diemer, M. A., McWhirter, E. H., Ozer, E. J., & Rapa, L. J. (2015). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of critical consciousness. The Urban Review, 47(5), 809–823. doi: 10.1007/s11256-015-0336-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diemer, M. A., & Rapa, L. J. (2016). Unraveling the complexity of critical consciousness, political efficacy, and political action among marginalized adolescents. Child Development, 87(1), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Voight, A. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The future of children, 20(1), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forenza, B., & Mendonca, C. (2016). Dream big: Exploring empowering processes of DREAM Act advocacy in a focal state. Journal of Latinos and Education. doi: 10.1080/15348431.2016.1240077.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (1968 [2014]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Galindo, R. (2012). Undocumented & unafraid: The DREAM Act 5 and the public disclosure of undocumented status as a political act. The Urban Review, 44(5), 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2002(96), 27–46.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godfrey, E. B., & Wolf, S. (2016). Developing critical consciousness or justifying the system? A qualitative analysis of attributions for poverty and wealth among low-income racial/ethnic minority and immigrant women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzales, R. G. (2008). Left out but not shut down: Political activism and the undocumented student movement. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 3, 219–239.Google Scholar
  23. Gonzales, R. G. (2011). Learning to be illegal undocumented youth and shifting legal contexts in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzales, R. G., & Bautista-Chavez, A. M. (2014). Two years and counting: Assessing the growing power of DACA. American Immigration Council Special Report.Google Scholar
  25. Hipolito-Delgado, C. P., & Zion, S. (2015). Igniting the fire within marginalized youth: The role of critical civic inquiry in fostering ethnic identity and civic self-efficacy. Urban Education. doi: 10.1177/0042085915574524.Google Scholar
  26. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber, L. P., & Malagon, M. C. (2007). Silenced struggles: The experiences of latina and latino undocumented college students in California. Nevada Law Journal, 7(3), 841–861.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, E., & Díaz, J. (2013). Immigrant students and higher education: ASHE higher education report 38:6. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth activism in an era of education inequality. New York, NY: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klar, M., & Kasser, T. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well-being. Political Psychology, 30(5), 755–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krogstad, J. M., Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2016). 5 Facts about Illegal Immigration in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/03/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/.
  32. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 837–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75): Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Mahony, R. M. (2012). The dream act: We all benefit. Notre Dame JL Ethics & Pub. Pol’y, 26, 459.Google Scholar
  35. Mangual Figueroa, A. (2017). Speech or silence: Undocumented students’ decisions to disclose or disguise their citizenship status in school. American Educational Research Journal, 0002831217693937.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, P. (2017). Trump and U.S. immigration policy. California Agriculture, 71(1), 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinez, M. L., Penaloza, P., & Valenzuela, C. (2012). Civic commitment in young activists: Emergent processes in the development of personal and collective identity. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 474–484. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCorkle, W. D., & Bailey, B. (2016). UN human rights violations here at home? The plight of undocumented and DACA students in South Carolina, USA. Journal of International Social Studies, 6(1), 161–167.Google Scholar
  39. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morales, A., Herrera, S., & Murry, K. (2011). Navigating the waves of social and political capriciousness: Inspiring perspectives from DREAM-eligible immigrant students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(3), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muñoz, S. M. (2013). “I just can’t stand being like this anymore”: Dilemmas, stressors, and motivators for undocumented Mexican women in higher education. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50(3), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Undocumented student tuition: Overview. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-overview.aspx.
  43. National Immigration Law Center (NILC). (2010). The DREAM Act: Correcting myths and misperceptions. Retrieved from https://www.nilc.org/issues/immigration-reform-and-executive-actions/dreamact/dreamcorrecting-myths-misperceptions/.
  44. National Immigration Law Center (NILC). (2014). Basic facts about in-state tuition for undocumented students. Los Angeles, CA: National Immigration Law Center.Google Scholar
  45. Negrón-Gonzales, G. (2014). Undocumented, unafraid and unapologetic: Re-articulatory practices and migrant youth “illegality”. Latino Studies, 12(2), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nguyen, D. H., & Hoy, Z. R. M. (2014). Jim Crowing Plyler v. Doe: The resegregation of undocumented students in American higher education through discriminatory state tuition and fee legislation. Clev. St. L. Rev., 63, 355.Google Scholar
  47. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2016). Child of unauthorized immigrants represent rising share of K-12 students. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  48. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. New York, NY: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Perez, Z. J. (2014). Removing barriers to higher education for undocumented students. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
  50. Pérez, W., Cortés, R. D., Ramos, K., & Coronado, H. (2010). “Cursed and blessed”: Examining the socioemotional and academic experiences of undocumented Latina and Latino college students. New Directions for Student Services, 2010(131), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plyler v. Doe, No. No. 80-1538, 457 202 (Supreme Court 1982).Google Scholar
  52. Potochnick, S. (2014). How states can reduce the dropout rate for undocumented immigrant youth: The effect of in-state resident tuition policies. Social Science Research, 45, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhoads, R. A. (1997). Interpreting identity politics: The educational challenge of contemporary student activism. Journal of College Student Development, 38(5), 508.Google Scholar
  54. Rhoads, R. A. (1998). Freedom’s web: Student activism in an age of cultural diversity. New Brunswick: ERIC.Google Scholar
  55. Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109. doi: 10.1177/0044118x10382877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2016). Contributions of social capital theory and social network models in advancing the connection between students’ school-based learning and community-based opportunities for pursuing interest-driven learning. Paper presented at the Building Youth Social Capital through Connected Learning, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  57. Suarez-Orozco, C., Katsiaficas, D., Birchall, O., Alcantar, C. M., Hernandez, E., Garcia, Y., et al. (2015). Undocumented undergraduates on college campuses: Understanding their challenges and assets and what it takes to make an undocufriendly campus. Harvard Educational Review, 85(3), 427–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teranishi, R., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2014). In the shadow of the ivory tower: Undocumented undergraduates and the liminal state of immigration reform: The Undocu Scholars Project. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  59. Thangasamy, A., & Horan, D. (2016). Lowering the cost barrier to higher education for undocumented students: A promising university-level intervention. Journal of Latinos and Education, 15(2), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. In C. A. Flanagan & B. D. Christens (Eds.), Youth civic development: Work at the cutting edge. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 43–57.Google Scholar
  61. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science and Politics, 37(02), 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, A. M. (2011). A dream detained: Undocumented Latino youth and the DREAM movement. NACLA Report on the Americas, 44(6), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brad Forenza
    • 1
  • Briana Rogers
    • 1
  • David T. Lardier
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Child Advocacy and Policy, 372 Dickson HallMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA
  2. 2.Department of Individual, Family, and Community EducationUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations