Abstract
This study extends research on school choice policy, and on the geography of educational opportunity, by exploring how students understand their school choices and select from them within social-geographical space. Using a conceptual framework that draws from situated social cognition and recent research on neighborhood effects, this study explores the experiences of 36 students seeking admission to high school in Chicago Public Schools, a large urban district that offered 130 high school options the year of data collection. Our findings reveal that students’ choice processes were geographically specific, and mirrored spatial patterns of power and privilege in Chicago. This article concludes with a discussion of findings’ implications for socially and spatially equitable school choice policy, and for subsequent research on the geography of educational opportunity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While each Chicago Public Schools student may attend a “neighborhood” high school where s/he lives, most students apply to a range of high schools including military, magnet, charter, International Baccalaureate, performing arts and selective enrollment high schools (SEHS).
When mentioned in conjunction with specific study participants, high school names are replaced with pseudonyms to protect participant privacy.
Schools considered “minimally selective” admitted students on the basis of an essay but did not consider applicants’ grades or test scores, or admitted students via lottery (but were not charter schools).
References
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. X, pp. 1–61). Mahway: Erlbaum.
Bell, C. A. (2007). Space and place: Urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. The Urban Review, 39(4), 375–404.
Bell, C. (2009a). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521.
Bell, C. (2009b). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
Belsa, K., & Sanchez, M. (2015). A surprise co-location among proposed ‘school actions’. Catalyst Chicago. http://catalyst-chicago.org/2015/12/some-surprises-in-proposed-school-actions/.
Berliner, D. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949–995.
Berliner, D. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America’s youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12), 1–26.
Berube, A. (2014). All cities are not created equal Metropolitan Opportunity Series. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Bradford, D. (2014). Families should be free to move children from failing schools. Indianapolis Recorder (12/11/14), retrieved online at http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/education/article_00033830-815a-11e4-a1e1-538298ff03e0.html#.VIsY2MDc4DQ.facebook.
Briggs, X. D. (2003). Housing opportunity, desegregation strategy, and policy research. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 201–206.
Briggs, X. D. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in Metropolitan America. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buendía, E. (2011). Reconsidering the Urban in Urban education: Interdisciplinary conversations. The Urban Review, 43(1), 1–13.
Chicago Public Schools (2016). Find a school. http://cps.edu/Schools/Find_a_school/Pages/findaschool.aspx.
Coates, T. (2014). The case for reparations. The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/.
Condliffe, B. F., Boyd, M. L., & DeLuca, S. M. (2015). Stuck in school: How social context shapes school choice for inner-city students. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–36.
Condron, D., & Roscigno, V. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 18–36.
Cox, T. (2015). Your rush-hour CTA commute could be getting more croweded. DNAinfo, http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150728/west-loop/your-rush-hour-cta-commute-could-be-getting-more-crowded.
Cucchiara, M. (2013). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and who loses when schools become urban amenities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Danns, D. (2014). Desegregating Chicago’s schools: Policy implementation, politics and protest, 1965–1985. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
de La Torre, M., Gordon, M. F., Moore, P., & Cowhy, J. (2015). School closings in Chicago: Understanding families’ choices and constraints for new school enrollment. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Dean, T. (2016). BOE approves consolidation of Austin High Campus. Austin Weekly News. Retrieved from http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=310302&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=576996.
Ehrenhalt, A. (2012). The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York: Vintage Books.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: Reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 7–43.
Gold, E., Evans, S. A., Haxton, C., Maluk, H., Mitchell, C., & Simon, E., et al. (2010). Transition to high school: School “choice” and freshman year in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Research for Action (9–48). Retrieved 7/10/14 at http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/publication-photos/110/Gold_E_Transition_to_High_School_School.pdf.
Goozner, M., Norris, M. L., & Griffin, J. L. (1988). Chicago schools “worst in America”. Chicago: Chicago Tribune.
Goyette, K. (2014). Setting the context. In A. Lareau & K. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 1–24). New York: Sage.
Green, T. L. (2015). Places of inequality, places of possibility: Mapping “opportunity in geography” across urban school-communities. Urban Review, 47, 717–741.
Gregory, S. (1970). Hey, white girl!. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Gustafson, K. (2011). No-go-area, no-go-school: Community discourses, local school market and children’s identity work. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 185–203.
Harris, E. A. (2015). Lack of diversity persists in admissions to New York City’s elite public schools. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/06/nyregion/lack-of-diversity-persists-in-admissions-to-selective-new-york-city-high-schools.html?_r=0&action=click&contentCollection=N.Y.%20%2F%20Region&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article#story-continues-2.
Hinz, G. (2007). Globalization splits Chicago’s economy. Crain’s Chicago Business. http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20071217/NEWS01/200027468/globalization-splits-chicagos-economy.
Hirsch, A. R. (1998). Making the second ghetto: Race and housing in Chicago, 1940–1960. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karp, S. (2013). Jones college prep to add selective seats. Chicago Catalyst. http://catalyst-chicago.org/2013/01/jones-college-prep-set-add-selective-seats/.
Kimelberg, S. M. (2014). Middle-class parents, risk and urban public schools. In A. Lareau & K. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 207–236). New York: Sage.
Kotlowitz, A. (1991). There are no children here: The story of two boys growing up in the other America. New York: Anchor Books.
Kotok, S., Frankenberg, E., Schafft, K. A., Mann, B. A., & Fuller, E. J. (2015). School choice, racial segregation, and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania charter school transfers. Educational Policy,. doi:10.1177/0895904815604112.
Lareau, A. (2014). Schools, housing and the reproduction of inequality. In A. Lareau & K. A. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 169–206). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform. New York: Routledge.
Lipman, P., Vaughan, K., & Gutirrez, R. R. (2014). Root shock: Parents’ perspectives on school closings in Chicago. Chicago: University of Illinois, Collaborative for Equity and Justice in Education.
Lutton, L., & Vevea, B. (2015). Chicago has a school with 13 freshmen. WBEZ News. https://www.wbez.org/shows/wbez-news/chicago-has-a-high-school-with-13-freshmen/dd7ebcb5-c22f-4b21-be36-583d0ad8bb6f.
Massey, D. (1993). Politics and space/time. In M. Keith & S. Pile (Eds.), Place and the politics of identity (pp. 141–161). New York: Routledge.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McVeigh, K. (2013). Hadiya Pendleton: Murdered honors student and symbol of Chicago violence. The Guardian, retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/31/hadiya-pendleton-inauguration-chicago-shot.
Menefee-Libey, D. (2010). Neoliberal school reform in Chicago? Renaissance 2010, portfolios of schools and diverse providers (55-90). In K. Bulkley, J. Henig, & H. Levin (Eds.), Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for Urban school reform (pp. 55–90). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Miller, P. (2012). Mapping educational opportunity zones: A geospatial analysis of neighborhood block groups. Urban Review, 44, 189–218.
Neely, B., & Samura, S. (2011). Social geographies of race: Connecting race and space. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(11), 1933–1952.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Novak, T. (2014). Tab for Jones College Prep could reach $127 million. Chicago Sun-Times, http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/7/71/242171/tab-increase-jones-college-prep-chicagos-expensive-school.
Pattillo, M. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the black community. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 12(1), 41–71.
Pattillo, M., Delale-O’Connor, L., & Butts, F. (2014). High-stakes choosing. In A. Lareau & K. A. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools. New York: Sage.
Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Perez, J. (2015). Dyett high school hunger strike ends. Chicago Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-dyett-high-school-hunger-strike-ends-20150919-story.html.
Phillippo, K., Griffin, B., & DelDotto, J. (2016). Youth experiences of competitive school choice policy: An analysis of developmental stage-policy fit. Washington: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Putnam, R. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Quiroz, P. A., Milam-Brooks, K., & Adams-Romena, D. (2014). School as solution to the problem of urban place: Student migration, perceptions of safety, and children’s concept of community. Childhood, 21, 207–225.
Reardon, S. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). New York: Sage.
Reardon, T. (2012). Comparative analysis of Boston public school proposed assignment plans. Boston: Metropolitan Area Planning Council.
Rhodes, A., & DeLuca, S. (2014). Residential mobility and school choice among poor families. In A. Lareau & K. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 137–166). New York: Sage.
Roda, A., & Wells, A. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents’ good intentions, anxiety and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261–293.
Rucker, P. (2013). Michelle Obama mourns slain teenager at Chicago funeral. Washington Post, retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/michelle-obama-heads-to-chicago-for-slain-teenagers-funeral/2013/02/09/418a9ea4-716e-11e2-8b8d-e0b59a1b8e2a_story.html.
Rury, J. (1999). Race, space, and the politics of Chicago’s public schools: Benjamin Willis and the tragedy of urban education. History of Education Quarterly, 39(2), 117–142.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sampson, R. J. (2013). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sanders, J. W. (1977). The education of an urban minority: Catholics in Chicago, 1833–1965. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanders, W. (2006). Private schools and school enrollment in Chicago. Chicago Fed Letter, 231. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505625.pdf.
Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.
Sassen, S. (2004). A global city: Introducing a concept. In C. Madigan (Ed.), Global Chicago (pp. 15–34). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Sattin-Bajaj, C. (2014). Unaccompanied minors: Immigrant youth, school choice and the pursuit of equity. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V., & Palma, T. A. (2012). Socially situated cognition: Recasting social cognition as an emergent phenomenon. In S. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social congition (pp. 138–164). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Sharkey, P. (2012). Residential mobility and the reproduction of unequal neighborhoods. Cityscape, 14(3), 9–31.
Shipps, D. (2006). School reform, corporate style: Chicago, 1880–2000. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Squires, G. D., Bennett, L., McCourt, K., & Nyden, P. (1987). Chicago: Class, race and the response to urban decline. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Squires, G. D., & Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Privileged places: Race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies, 42(47), 47–68.
Stevens, W. D., de La Torre, M., & Johnson, D. W. (2011). High school choice: Processes and outcomes in Chicago. In M. Berends, M. Cannata, & E. Goldring (Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 124–146). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Tate, W. F. (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411.
Teaford, J. C. (1990). The rough road to renaissance: Urban revitalization in America, 1940–1985. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wells, A. S. (1993). The sociology of choice: Why some win and others lose in the educational marketplace. In E. Rasell & R. Rothsetin (Eds.), School choice: Examining the evidence. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
Wells, A. S., Ready, D., Duran, J., Grzesikowski, C., Hill, K., Roda, A. Miya, et al. (2012). Still separate, still unequal, but not always so “suburban”. In W. Tate (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities (pp. 125–149). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wilson, S. G., Plane, D. A., Mackun, P. J., Fischette, T. R., & Goworowska, J. (2012). Patterns of metropolitan and micropolitan population change: 2000–2010. Washington: US Census Bureau.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Yoon, E. (2016). Young people’s cartographies of school choice: The urban imaginary and moral panic. Children’s Geographies, 14(1), 101–114.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Annmarie Valdes, Landis Fryer and Zareen Kamal for their assistance with data collection, preparation and analysis, David Treering for his preparation of this article's map figures, and Linn Posey-Maddox, Pamela Quiroz and The Urban Review’s anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillippo, K.L., Griffin, B. The Social Geography of Choice: Neighborhoods’ Role in Students’ Navigation of School Choice Policy in Chicago. Urban Rev 48, 668–695 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0373-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0373-x