The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 440–462 | Cite as

Exploring Instructional Practices in a Spanish/English Bilingual Classroom Through Sitios y Lenguas and Testimonio

  • Gabriela Romero
  • Christina Passos DeNicolo
  • Claudia Fradkin
Article

Abstract

Drawing from Chicana feminist perspectives and Pérez (Living Chicana theory. Third Woman Press, Berkeley, pp 87–101, 1998) theories of sitios y lenguas (space and discourses) the authors reposition understandings of teaching and learning through a qualitative case study of a first grade Spanish/English bilingual classroom. Through analysis of field notes, interviews, and the teacher’s testimonio, the authors examine how sitios y lenguas functions as a tool to identify ways that home languages and cultural backgrounds are valued resources for learning in one bilingual classroom. Findings show how theorizing classroom spaces (sitios) and the interchange of languages (lenguas) counters hegemonic discourses by providing a narrative that reclaims knowledge production of bilingual and bicultural communities (Anzaldúa in Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestizo. Aunt Lute Press, San Francisco, 1987: Darder in Latinos and education: a critical reader. Routledge, New York, pp 331–350, 1997; Villenas in Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology. State University Press, New York, pp 1–10, 2006).

Keywords

Chicana feminist perspectives Elementary instruction Emergent bilingual Latinas/os 

References

  1. Alarcón, N. (1988). Making ‘familia’ from scratch: Split subjectivities in the work of Helena María Viramontes and Cherrie Moraga. In M. Herrera-Sobek & H. M. Viramontes (Eds.), Chicana creativity and criticism: Charting new frontiers in American literature (pp. 147–159). Houston, TX: Arte Público Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestizo. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolomé, L. I. (2008). Authentic cariño and respect in minority education: The political and ideological dimensions of love. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 1(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Beverly, J. (2005). Testimonio, subalternity, and narrative authority. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 547–557). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Group.Google Scholar
  6. Burdick-Will, J., & Gómez, C. (2006). Assimilation versus multiculturalism: Bilingual education and the Latino challenge. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5(3), 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burstein, J. H., & Montaño, T. (2011). Maestras dedicadas: A portrait of Chicana teacher activism in troubled times. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 37–53.Google Scholar
  8. Calderón, D., Delgado Bernal, D., Pérez Huber, L., Malagón, M., & Vélez, V. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 513–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrillo, R. (2006). Humor casero mujerista—womanist humor of the home: Laughing all the way to greater cultural understandings and social relations. In D. Delgado Bernal, C.A., Elenes, F.E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.). Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 181–197). New York: State University.Google Scholar
  10. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Claeys, L., & Muñoz, H. (2014). Unearthing sacred knowledge: Enlazándonos con la comunidad, In B.B. Flores, O.A.Vásquez, & E.R. Clark (Eds.), Generating transworld pedagogy: Reimagining la clase mágica (pp. 67–80). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, E. R., & Flores, B. B. (2005). Creating a just society: Multicultural teacher education and the changing classroom. Teacher Education and Practice, 18(3), 315–332.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (2004). The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  14. Córdova, T. (1998). Power and knowledge: Colonialism in the academy. In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory (pp. 17–45). Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, J. (2007). Diminished vision of civil rights: No child left behind and the growing divide in how educational equity is understood. Education Week, 26(1), 31.Google Scholar
  16. Cruz, C. (2012). Making curriculum from scratch: Testimonio in an urban classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
  18. Darder, A. (1997). Creating the conditions for cultural democracy in the classroom. In A. Darder, R. D. Torres, & H. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Latinos and education: A critical reader (pp. 331–350). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. De los Ríos, C. V. (2013). A curriculum of the borderlands: High school Chicana/o-Latina/o studies as sitios y lengua. The Urban Review, 45(1), 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delgado Bernal, D., Alemán, E., & Garavito, A. (2009). Latina/o undergraduate students mentoring Latina/o elementary students: A borderlands analysis of shifting identities and first-year experiences. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 560–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delgado Bernal, D., Burciaga, R., & Flores Carmona, J. (2012). Chicana/Latina Testimonio: Mapping the methodological, pedagogical, and political. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delgado-Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delgado-Bernal, D. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestizo consciousness of Chicana students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeNicolo, C. P. (2014). ¡Fantástico!’ Valuing student knowledge through the morning message. The Reading Teacher, 68(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The landscapes of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Deyhle, D., & Swisher, K. (1997). Research in American Indian and Alaskan Native education: From assimilation to self-determination. Review of Research in Education, 22, 113–194.Google Scholar
  27. Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2010). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. DiPucchio, K. S. (2008). Grace for president. New York: Hyperion Books for Children.Google Scholar
  29. Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Elenes, C. A. (1997). Reclaiming the borderlands: Chicana/o identity, difference, and critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 43(3), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elenes, C. A. (2000). Chicana feminist narrative and the politics of the self. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 21(3), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Faltis, C. (2013). Language, language development and teaching English to emergent bilingual users: Challenging the common knowledge theory in teacher education and K -12 school settings. Association of Mexican-American Educators, 7(2), 18–29.Google Scholar
  34. Flores, L. A. (2000). Reclaiming the ‘Other’: Toward a Chicana feminist critical perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(5), 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flores, B. B., & Clark, E. R. (2004). A critical examination of Normalistas’ self-conceptualization and teacher efficacy. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 25(X), 230–257.Google Scholar
  36. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gándara, P., & Hopkins, M. (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gándara, P., Moran, R., & García, E. (2004). Legacy of Brown: Lau and language policy in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 28, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. García, O. (2015). U.S. Spanish and education: Global and local intersections. Review of Research in Education, 38, 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. García, O., Kleifgen, J. A. & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent Bilinguals. Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1. http://www.tc.columbia.edu/i/a/document/6468_Ofelia_ELL_Final.pdf.
  42. Godinez, F. E. (2006). Haciendo que hacer: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational practices and policies. In D. Delgado Bernal, C.A., Elenes, F.E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.). Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 25–38). New York: State University.Google Scholar
  43. González, N., Moll, L. C., Floyd Tenery, M., Rivera, A., Rendón, P., Gonzales, R., & Amanti, C. (1995). Funds of knowledge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Education, 29(4), 444–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grande, S. (2008). Red pedagogy: The un-methodology. In N. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. D. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 233–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guardia Jackson, L. (2006). Shaping a borderland professional identity: Funds of knowledge of a bilingual education teacher. Teacher Education & Practice, 19(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
  46. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Agency and identity in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hurtado, A. (1998). Sitios y lenguas: Chicanas Theorizing Feminism. Hypatia, 13(2), 134–161. University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hurtado, A. (2003). Theory in the flesh: Toward an endarkened epistemology. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lane, H. B., & Wright, T. L. (2007). Maximizing the effectiveness of reading aloud. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Latina Feminist Group. (2001). Telling to live: Latina feminist testimonios. NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lindholm-Leary, K. (2001). Dual language education. Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  54. López, F., McEneaney, E., & Nieswandt, M. (2015). Language instruction educational programs and academic achievement of English learners: Considerations for states with changing demographics. American Journal of Education, 121(3), 417–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lutz, A. (2006). Spanish maintenance among English-speaking Latino youth: The role of individual and social characteristics. Social Forces, 84(3), 1417–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Menken, K. (2010). NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequences. Theory into Practice, 49, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2014). No child left bilingual: Accountability and the elimination of bilingual education programs in New York city schools. Educational Policy, 28(1), 96–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrative diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Moll, L. C., & Ruiz, R. (2002). The schooling of Latino children. In M. M. Suárez-Orozco & M. M. Páez (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 362–388). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Moraga, C. (1983). Loving in the war years: Lo que nunca pasó por sus labios. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nieto, S. (2001). We speak in many tongues: Linguistic diversity and multicultural education. In C. P. Díaz (Ed.), Multicultural education for the twenty-first century (pp. 152–170). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  64. Nieto, S. (2005). Public education in the twentieth century and beyond: High hopes, broken promises, and an uncertain future. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2001). 20 U. S. C. 6301 et seq.Google Scholar
  66. Pérez, E. (1998). Irigaray’s female symbolic in the making of Chicana lesbian sitios y lenguas (sites and discourses). In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory (pp. 87–101). Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar
  67. Pérez, E. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Pérez Huber, L. P. (2009). Disrupting apartheid of knowledge: Testimonio as methodology in Latina/o critical race research in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(6), 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prieto, L. (2013). Maestras constructing mestiza consciousness through agency within bilingual education. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies, 5(3), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prieto, L., & Villenas, S. A. (2012). Pedagogies from Nepantla: Testimonio, Chicana/Latina Feminisns and Teacher Education classrooms. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.Google Scholar
  72. Rumbaut, R. G., Massey, D. S., & Bean, F. D. (2006). Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in Southern California. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saavedra, C. M. (2011). Language and literacies in the borderlands: Children acting up the world through testimonios. Language Arts, 88(4), 261–269.Google Scholar
  74. San Miguel, G. (2004). Contested policy: The rise and fall of federal bilingual education in the United States, 1960–2001. Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sánchez, G. J. (2002). “Y tú, ¿qué?” (Y2K): Latino history in the new millennium. In M.M. Suárez-Orozco & M.M Páez, (Eds.), Latinos Remaking America (pp. 45–58). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sánchez, P., & Ek, L. D. (2009). Escuchando a las maestras/os: Immigration politics and Latina/o preservice bilingual educators. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1–2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective reading programs for English language learners: A best-evidence synthesis (Vol. 66). Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk. The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  78. Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2008). In what language should English language learners be tested? In R. J. Kopriva (Ed.), Improving testing for English language learners: A comprehensive approach to designing, building, implementing and interpreting better academic assessments. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  80. Spring, J. (2012). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  81. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.Google Scholar
  83. Tran, V. C. (2010). English gain vs. Spanish loss? Language assimilation among second-generation Latinos in young adulthood. Social Forces, 89(1), 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  85. Vélez-Ibañez, C., & Greenberg, J. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S.-Mexican households. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23(4), 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Villenas, S., Godinez, F. E., Delgado Bernal, D., & Elenes, C. A. (2006). Chicanas/Latinas building bridges. An introduction. In D. Delgado Bernal, C.A. Elenes, F.E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.). Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 1–10). New York: State University.Google Scholar
  88. Wilson, C. M., Ek, L. D., & Douglas, T. M. O. (2014). Recasting border crossing politics and pedagogies to combat educational inequity: Experiences, identities, and perceptions of Latino/a immigrant youth. The Urban Review, 46, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yudice, G. (1985). Central American testimonio. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  90. Zentella, A. C. (2005). Premises, promises, and pitfalls of language socialization research in Latino families and communities. In A. C. Zentella (Ed.), Building on strength: Language and literacy in Latino families and communities (pp. 13–30). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Romero
    • 1
  • Christina Passos DeNicolo
    • 2
  • Claudia Fradkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Division of Teacher EducationWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations