Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 101–122 | Cite as

Taken Out of Context: Piecing Together College Guidance Information in Urban High Schools

  • Shomon Shamsuddin
Article

Abstract

Information and guidance about college is critical for students to pursue postsecondary education. However, students attending urban schools often have less information and less access to information about college pathways than their peers at wealthy suburban schools. High school counselors are a primary source of college guidance but little is known about the form and content of the information they provide. Based on analyses of participant observations and interviews with urban high school guidance counselors and students, this research investigated what types of college guidance information were offered to students and how that information was framed. The findings revealed that counselors emphasized facts about higher education and procedures involved in applying to colleges. However, this information was provided without the necessary context for interpreting it, as shown by: (1) mixed signals regarding high school performance and college standards, (2) missing pieces of information about grade point averages, and (3) communication barriers related to college admissions data. The incomplete academic framework hindered students in making effective use of college guidance and advancing along the path to college.

Keywords

Guidance counselors College readiness Guidance information College knowledge 

References

  1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  2. American Counseling Association. (2014). United States student-to-counselor ratios for elementary and secondary schools. http://www.counseling.org/. Last accessed 15 March 2015.
  3. American School Counselor Association. (2013). Student-to-school–counselor ratio 2010–2011. http://www.schoolcounselor.org/press. Last accessed 15 March 2015.
  4. Bailey, M., & Dynarski, S. (2011). Inequality in college entry and completion. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bergerson, A. A. (2009). College choice and access to college: Moving policy, research and practice to the 21st century. ASHE higher education report (Vol. 35). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, J. (2007). (Mis)reading social class in the journey towards college: Youth development in urban America. Teachers College Record, 109(2), 343–368.Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera, A., Burkum, K., & La Nasa, S. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: A formula for success. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger Series on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Cabrera, A., & La Nasa, S. (2000). Understanding the college-choice process. New Directions for Institutional Research, 107, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conley, D. T. (2010). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corwin, Z. B., & Tierney, W. G. (2007). Getting there—and beyond: Building a culture of college-going in high schools. Los Angeles, CA: USC Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  11. Corwin, Z. B., Venegas, K. M., Oliverez, P. M., & Colyar, J. E. (2004). School counsel: How appropriate guidance affects educational equity. Urban Education, 39(4), 442–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Ellwood, D., & Kane, T. J. (2000). Who is getting a college education: Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In S. Danzinger & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), Securing the future: Investing in children from birth to college. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Farmer-Hinton, R. (2008). Social capital and college planning: Students of Color using school networks for support and guidance. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farmer-Hinton, R. (2011). On being college prep: Examining the implementation of a “college for all” mission in an urban charter school. The Urban Review, 43(5), 567–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grodsky, E., & Jones, M. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36(2), 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haskins, R., & Rouse, C. (2013). Time for change: A new federal strategy to prepare disadvantaged students for college. The Future of Children, Policy Brief Spring 2013, 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Heller, D. E. (Ed.). (2002). Condition of access: Higher education for lower income students. Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, L. D. (2012). Environmental threats to college counseling strategies in urban high schools: Implications for student preparation for college transitions. The Urban Review, 44(1), 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holland, N., & Farmer-Hinton, R. (2009). Leave no schools behind: The importance of a college culture in urban public schools. The High School Journal, 92(3), 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horn, L. J., Chen, X., & Chapman, C. (2003). Getting ready to pay for college: What students and their parents know about the cost of college tuition and what they are doing to find out. NCES-2003-030. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  22. Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62(3), 207–221.Google Scholar
  23. Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, J. E. (1996). The decision to go to college: Attitudes and experiences associated with college attendance among low-income students. Washington, DC: College Board.Google Scholar
  25. Kirst, M. W. (2014). The college puzzle: A college success blog by Dr. Michael W. Kirst. http://collegepuzzle.stanford.edu. Accessed 27 Feb 2014.
  26. Lee, V. E., & Ekstrom, R. B. (1987). Student access to guidance counseling in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Litten, L. H. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: Some refinements in a model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(4), 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Long, B. T. (2010). Grading higher education: Giving consumers the information they need. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress and The Hamilton Project.Google Scholar
  30. Luna De La Rosa, M. (2006). Is opportunity knocking? Low-income students’ perceptions of college and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1670–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  32. McDonough, P. M. (2005). Counseling matters: Knowledge, assistance, and organizational commitment in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  33. MetLife. (2011). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Preparing students for college and careers. New York, NY: MetLife.Google Scholar
  34. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, J. M., & Soares, L. (2010). The social life of college information: Relationships and experiences as tools for enhancing college decision making. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
  36. National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Common core of data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  37. Noguera, P. (2001). Racial politics and the elusive quest for excellence and equity in education. Education and Urban Society, 34(1), 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oyserman, D., & Fryberg, S. (2006). The possible selves of diverse adolescents: Context and function across gender, race and national origin. In C. Dunkel & J. Kerpelman (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research and application. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Perna, L. W. (2004). Impact of student aid program design, operations, and marketing on the formation of family college-going plans and resulting college-going behaviors of potential students. Boston, MA: The Education Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  41. Perna, L. W., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Thomas, S. L., Bell, A., Anderson, R., & Li, C. (2008). The role of college counseling in shaping college opportunity: Variations across high schools. The Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plank, S. B., & Jordan, W. J. (2001). Effects of information, guidance, and actions on postsecondary destinations: A study of talent loss. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 947–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reid, M. J., & Moore, J. L., I. I. I. (2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education, 43(2), 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., & Coca, V. (2009). College readiness for all: The challenge for urban high schools. The Future of Children, 19(1), 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenbaum, J. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenbaum, J., Miller, S. R., & Krei, M. S. (1996). Gatekeeping in an era of more open gates: High school counselors’ view of their influence on students’ college plans. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross, T., Kena, G., Rathbun, A., KewalRamini, A., Zhang, J., Kristapovich, P., et al. (2012). Higher education: Gaps in access and persistence study. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. Stage, F. K., & Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education, 30(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Talbert-Johnson, C. (2004). Structural inequities and the achievement gap in urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 37(1), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., & Bernal, E. M. (2001). Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education (no. 2001-1). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  53. Torche, F. (2011). Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 763–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Welton, A. D., & Martinez, M. A. (2014). Coloring the college pathway: A more culturally responsive approach to college readiness and access for students of color in secondary schools. The Urban Review, 46(2), 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations