Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 25–46 | Cite as

Identity Production in Figured Worlds: How Some Multiracial Students Become Racial Atravesados/as

  • Aurora Chang
Article

Abstract

Using Holland et al.’s (Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998) theory of identity and their concept of figured worlds, this article provides an overview of how twenty-five undergraduates of color came to produce a Multiracial identity. Using Critical Race Theory methodology with ethnographic interviewing as the primary method, I specifically focus on the ways in which Multiracial figured worlds operate within a racial borderland (Anzaldúa in Borderlands: La Frontera—The New Mestiza, Aunt Lute Books, San Francisco, 1987), an alternate, marginal world where improvisational play (Holland et al. in Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998) and facultad became critical elements of survival. Participants exercised their agency by perforating monoracial storylines and developed a complex process of identity production that informed their behaviors by a multifaceted negotiation of positionalities. I end by focusing on implications for urban education that can be drawn from this study.

Keywords

Multiracial Racial queer Identity Agency 

References

  1. Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the development of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and understanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands: La Frontera—The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  3. Apple, M. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, R. (2005). Freeing ourselves from neocolonial domination in research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The genesis of the concepts of ‘Habitus’ and ‘Field’. Sociocriticism, 2(2), 11–24.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, M., Denson, N., Sáenz, V., & Misa, K. (2006). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 430–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, M. J., Witt, D., Jones, J., & Hakuta, K. (2003). Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chang-Ross, A. (2010). Reflections of a racial queer. Journal of Multicultural Perspectives., 12(2), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 1–26.Google Scholar
  12. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.Google Scholar
  14. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr, Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hurtado, S., Dey, E. L., Gurin, P., & Gurin, G. (2003). College environments, diversity, and student learning. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 145–190). Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ifekwunigwe, J. O. (2004). Mixed race studies: A reader. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1986). Racial Formation in the United States from the 1960's to the 1980's. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(23), 23–44.Google Scholar
  23. Spivak, G. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Torres, E. (2003). Chicana without apology: The new Chicana cultural studies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Urrieta, L. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. Urban Review, 39(2), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weber, M. (Ed.). (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational StudiesThe University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations