Abstract
Interactions with capital—how it is identified, accumulated and exchanged—occur within fields of action, and every field has its own set of rules, or habitus, shaping the ways in which these interactions unfold. Classrooms, the fields in which students interact in schools, shape and privilege certain ways of thinking and acting, thereby building (or neglecting) opportunities for students. Yet little research has focused on student perceptions of classroom interaction, and particularly whether or how classroom participation might be a form of capital for them. Deploying data collected through classroom observations and interviews with Latina/o students at a large urban high school, this study focuses on examining the ways in which distinct groups of Latina/o students (in a set of schools within a school) understand and experience classroom participation. Findings reveal that while a shared understanding of classroom habitus may be more common than previously thought, we cannot just tell students to participate, or merely depend upon a general belief in the value of participating. Instead, we must simultaneously and explicitly bolster student participation and the cultivation of student networks so that a shared habitus turns the promises of participation into meaningful and equitable praxis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, A. (2005). Capitalizing on Bourdieu: How useful are concepts of ‘social capital’ and ‘social field’ for researching ‘marginalized’ young women? Theory and Research in Education, 3(1), 63–79.
Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427. doi:10.1002/sce.20365.
Arneil, B. (2006). Diverse communities: The problem with social capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40(6), 1039–1058.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bogden, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, A. (2008). Effectively educating Latino/a students: A comparative study of participation patterns of Hispanic American and Anglo American university students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(2), 97–118.
Brown, R. (2009). Teaching for social justice: Exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy practices of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 171–185.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (1996). “Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement” [Electronic version]. Chapter to be included in Wehlage, G.G. & J.A. White (Eds.) (in progress) Rebuilding the village: Social capital and education in America. London: Falmer Press. Retrieved July 2006, from http://eric.ed.gov.
Bullen, E., & Kenway, J. (2005). Bourdieu, subcultural capital and risky girlhood. Theory and Research in Education, 3(1), 47–61.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Chapa, J., & De La Rosa, B. (2006). The problematic pipeline: Demographic trends and Latino participation in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs. Journal of Hispanic Education, 5(3), 203–221.
Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 249–284.
Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103(4), 548–581.
Crosnoe, R. (2005). Double disadvantage or signs of resilience? The elementary school contexts of children from Mexican immigrant families. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 269–303.
Delgado-Gaitan, C., & Trueba, H. (1991). Crossing cultural borders. London: Falmer Press.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. NY: Touchstone.
Dumais, S. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75, 44–68.
Eckert, P. (2000). Language variation as social practice. Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London: Routledge.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.
Fry, R. (2005). The high schools Hispanics attend: Size and other key characteristics. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
Garrett, P., & Baquedano-Lopez, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339–361.
Gibson, M. (1998). Promoting academic success among immigrant students: Is acculturation the issue? Educational Policy, 12(6), 615–633.
Gibson, M., Gándara, P., & Koyama, J. (Eds.). (2004). School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gillies, R. M., & Khan, A. (2008). The effects of teacher discourse on students’ discourse, problem-solving and reasoning during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 323–340. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2008.06.001.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gloria, A., Castellanos, J., Lopez, A., & Rosales, R. (2005). An examination of academic nonpersistence decisions of Latino undergraduates. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 202–223.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action, social structure and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Hawkins, M. (2004). Researching English language and literacy development in schools. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 14–25.
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.
Horvat, E. M., & Davis, J. E. (2011). Schools as sites for transformation: Exploring the contribution of habitus. Youth & Society, 43(1), 142–170.
Jansen, A. (2006). Seventh graders’ motivations for participating in two discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 409–428.
Jansen, A. (2008). An investigation of relationships between seventh-grade students’ beliefs and their participation during mathematics discussions in two classrooms. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(1), 68–100.
Katz, S. R. (1999). Teaching in tensions: Latino immigrant youth, their teachers, and the structures of schooling. Teachers College Record, 100(4), 809–840.
Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 141–158.
Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37–53.
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5–6), 567–606.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, V., & Croninger, R. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 102, 286–329.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.
Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785–795.
Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the ‘Community of practice’ metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, culture, and Activity, 8(2), 129–147.
LiPuma, E. (1993). Culture and the concept of culture in a theory of practice. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 14–34). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Losey, K. (1995). Mexican American students and classroom interaction: An overview and critique. Review of Educational Research, 65, 283–318.
Macías, J. (1990). Scholastic antecedents of immigrant students: Schooling in a Mexican immigrant sending community. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 21(4), 291–318.
McGonigal, J., Doherty, R., Allan, J., Mills, S., Catts, R., Redford, M., et al. (2007). Social capital, social inclusion and changing school contexts: A Scottish perspective. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(1), 77–94.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mehan, H. (1998). The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development, 41(4), 245–269.
Monkman, K., Ronald, M., & Théramène, F. (2005). Social and cultural capital in an urban Latino school community. Urban Education, 40(1), 4–33.
Morrow, V. (1999). Conceptualising social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. The Sociological Review, 47(4), 744–765.
Moss, P. (2005). Toward “epistemic reflexivity” in educational research: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 19–29.
Oliva, M. (2004). Reluctant partners, problem definition, and legislative intent: K-16 policy for Latino college success. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 209–230.
Olneck, M. (2000). Can multicultural education change what counts as cultural capital. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 317–348.
Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 26–32.
Patchen, T. (2006). Engendering participation, deliberating dependence: Inner city adolescents’ perceptions on classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2053–2079.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pérez, P., & McDonough, P. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latino college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(3), 249–265.
Pew Hispanic Center Fact Sheet. (2002). Educational attainment: Better than meets the eye, but large challenges remain. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Annenburg School for Communication.
Polman, J. L. (2004). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 431–436.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
Portes, Al. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1–12.
Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. American Prospect, 26, 18–22.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631.
Sleeter, C. (2011). The academic and social value of ethnic studies: A research review. National Education Association Research Department. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stanton-Salazar, R., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116–135.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. M. (1995). Transformations: Family life and achievement motivation among Latino youth. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
U.S. Census. (2002). U.S. Hispanic population, 2002. Retrieved from www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hispanic/ppl-165/…/02show.ppt.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1973). Teachers and students: Differences in teacher interaction with Mexican American and Anglo students. Report V: Mexican American education study. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Valencia, R. R. (Ed.). (2002). Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future. New York: Routledge.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Valverde, S. (1987). A comparative study of Hispanic high school dropouts and graduates: Why do some leave school early and some finish? Education and Urban Society, 19, 320–329.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wells, G., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/.
Wolcott, H. F. (1987). On ethnographic intent. In G. Spindler & L. Spindler (Eds.), Interpretive ethnography of education: At home and abroad (pp. 37–57). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported with grants from the Spencer Foundation and UC ACCORD. The author thanks Gustavo Fischman, Hugh “Bud” Mehan, and Sean K. Smith for comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patchen, T. Capitalizing on Participation: Latina/o Adolescents and the Classroom Economy. Urban Rev 44, 511–533 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0210-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0210-9