Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Missing the Point: A Rejoinder to Pearl and Knight on the Necessary Cross-Pollination of Democratic Education and Critical Pedagogy

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cooke, M. (2000). Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48, 947–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (2007). Deliberative participation in local development. Journal of Human Development, 8(3), 431–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dréze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Andrade, J., & Morrell, E. (2007). Critical pedagogy and popular culture in an urban secondary English classroom. In P. McLaren & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 184–199). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2010). Critical pedagogy and democratic education: Possibilities for cross- pollination. The Urban Review, 42(3). doi:10.1007/s11256-009-0129-y.

  • Fischman, G. E., & Gandin, L. A. (2007). Escola cidada and critical discourses of educational hope. In P. McLaren & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 209–221). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2007). Democracy, education, and the politics of critical pedagogy. In P. McLaren & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 1–5). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R. A., & Beutel, A. R. (2007). Why a book on “useful theory”? What makes theory “useful”? In R. A. Goldstein (Ed.), Useful theory: Making critical education practical (pp. 1–11). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2007). Critical pedagogy in the twenty-first century: Evolution for survival. In P. McLaren & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 10–42). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T., & Pearl, A. (2000). Democratic education and critical pedagogy. The Urban Review, 32(3), 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, E., & Duncan-Andrade, J. (2006). Popular culture and critical media pedagogy in secondary literacy classrooms. International Journal of Learning, 12(9), 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, A., & Knight, T. (2010). Rejoinder to D. Brent Edwards Jr. and his interpretation of our position on democratic education and social justice. The Urban Review, 42(3). doi:10.1007/s11256-010-0160-z.

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: First Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Brent Edwards Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, D.B. Missing the Point: A Rejoinder to Pearl and Knight on the Necessary Cross-Pollination of Democratic Education and Critical Pedagogy. Urban Rev 42, 249–252 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0159-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0159-5

Keywords

Navigation