The Urban Review

, 41:437 | Cite as

Alternatively Certified Teachers in Urban Small Schools: Where Policy Reform Meets the Road



In this study we explore the experiences of new teachers in urban schools at the intersection of three major policy agendas—alternative certification, new teacher retention, and the small schools movement. We examine alternatively certified teachers’ perceptions of the rewards and challenges of teaching in small schools, the support neophyte teachers seek and receive in these unique educational settings, and the reality of small school implementation in a modern urban environment. The findings have implications for policy-makers, urban school reformers, teacher educators and professional developers, administrators and teachers working to create and implement effective policy for twenty-first century urban schools.


Alternative certification New teachers School reform Small schools Teacher retention 


  1. Ayers, W. (Ed.). (2005). To become a teacher: Making a difference in children’s lives. New York & London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ayers, W., & Klonsky, M. (2006). Chicago’s Renaissance 2010: The small schools movement meets the ownership society. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(6), 453–457.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, D. P., & Smith, T. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality: Refocusing the issue. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 29–35.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95, 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Michelli, N. M., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). Complex by design: Investigating pathways into teaching in New York City schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S. G., & Sebring, P. A. (1993). A view from the elementary schools: The state of reform in Chicago. Report. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, J. (2007). The challenge of parent engagement in urban small schools reform, American Educational Research Association 2007 E-Yearbook of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research. Available at Accessed 24 July 2007.
  8. City Schools. (February 2006). Newsletter of the New York City Department of Education. Available at Newsletters/February2006.htm#Article4. Accessed 16 July 2006.
  9. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? 2005 presidential address. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corcoran, T., Walker, L., & White, J. (1988). Working in urban schools. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
  11. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered, teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costigan, A. (2004). Finding a name for what they want: A study of New York City’s teaching fellows. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costigan, A. (2005). Choosing to stay, choosing to leave: New York City teaching fellows after two years. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32, 125–142.Google Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. Evaluative report. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.Google Scholar
  15. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus school project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L., Ross, P., & Milliken, M. (2007). High school size, organization, and content: What matters for students success. Brookings Papers on Educational Policy 2006/2007 (pp. 163–203). Available at Accessed 12 May 2008.
  17. Education Week. (2006, January 25). Come clean on small schools by David Bloomfield. 25(20), 34–35. Available at Accessed 10 March 2007.
  18. Education Week. (2006, May 3). Small schools’ ripple effect debated by Erik Robelen. 25(34), 1–20. Available at Accessed 10 March 2007.
  19. Epstein, J., & Sanders, M. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055. Available at, ID Number: 10824, Accessed 1 June 2007.
  21. Flores, M. A. (2006). Being a novice teacher in two different settings: Struggles, continuities, and discontinuities. Teachers College Record, 180(10), 2021–2052. Available at, ID Number: 12721, Accessed 10 Oct 2006.
  22. Foundation Center. (2005). Social justice grantmaking: A report on foundation trends. New York City, NY: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  23. Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  24. Guarino, C., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holland, N. (2002). Small schools making big changes: The importance of professional communities in school reform. Research report, Consortium on Chicago School Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Humphrey, D. C., Wechsler, M. E., & Hough, H. J. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternative certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(4). Available at, ID Number: 12613, Accessed 17 Oct 2006.
  27. Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools. Research report. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Available at Accessed 1 May 2008.
  28. Inman, D., & Marlow, L. (2004). Teacher retention: Why do beginning teachers remain in the profession? Education, 24(4), 605–614.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobowitz, R., Weinstein, M. G., Maguire, C., Luekens, M., & Fructer, N. (2007). The effectiveness of small high schools, 1994–95 to 2003–04. New York, NY: New York University Institute for Education and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  30. Jendryka, B. (1994). Public school choice in the inner city. National Civic Review, 83(2), 146–151. Available at Accessed 16 Nov 2005.
  31. Kapadia, K., Coca, V., & Easton, J. (2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago Public Schools. Research Report, Consortium on Chicago School Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Kardos, S. M., & Johnson, S. M. (2007). On their own and presumed expert: New teachers experiences with their colleagues. Teachers College Record, 109(9), 2083–2106., ID Number: 12812, Accessed 7 June 2007.
  33. Keiler, L., & Carter, J. (2007). New teachers finding their way in urban schools. Conference proceedings. 5th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education, Waikiki, HI.Google Scholar
  34. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Mawhinney, T., & Sagan, L. (2007). The power of personal relationships. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(6), 460–464.Google Scholar
  36. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  37. McCormack, A., & Thomas, K. (2003). Is survival enough? Induction experiences of beginning teachers within a New South Wales context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA & London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Ness, M. (2001). Lesson of a first-year teacher. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), 700–701.Google Scholar
  42. New Visions for Public Schools. (2007). Reforming high schools: Lessons from the New Century high schools initiative 2001–2006. New York, NY: New Visions for Public Schools. Available at Accessed 1 May 2007.
  43. New York City Council Investigation Division. (2004). Teacher attrition and retention. New York City. Available at Accessed 17 May 2007.
  44. New York City Department of Education. (2006). Multiple pathways research and development. Research report. New York, NY: Office of Multiple Pathways to Graduation. Available at Accessed 1 May 2008.
  45. New York City Department of Education. (n.d.). New schools, new options. Available at Accessed 17 May 2007.
  46. New York Times. (2005, August 21). Young students are new focus for big donors by Tamar Lewin. Available at Accessed 6 May 2008.
  47. New York Times. (2007, February 14). School officials and backers of bilingual education are on different pages by Samuel Freedman. Available at Accessed: 3/10/07.
  48. New York Times. (2005, November 4). Study raises issues on small high schools by David Herszenhorn. Available at Accessed 10 March 2007.
  49. Nieto, S. (2003). What keeps teachers going? New York & London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  50. NYCTF. (2007). New York City Teaching Fellows Press Kit. Available at Accessed 17 May 2007.
  51. NYCTF. (2008). Program overview. Available at Accessed 9 Nov 2008.
  52. NYS Education Department. (2006). Alternative teacher preparation in New York State, 2004–2005 annual report. Report to the Committee on Higher Education and Professional Practice. Albany, NY: NYS State Education Department.Google Scholar
  53. Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1997). A seven year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robelen, E. (2006). Small schools’ ripple effects debated. Education Week, 5/3/2006, 25(34), pp. 1, 20, 2 p, 2c, downloaded from Ebsco Host 7/18/06.Google Scholar
  55. Scherer, M. (2003). Keeping good teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  56. Siegel, D., Hadj Amor, H. B., Zaltsman, A., & Fruchter, N. (2005). Assessing success in New York City high schools. New York, NY: Institute for Education & Social Policy, NYU. Unpublished report for New Visions for Public Schools Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Sparks, K., & Keiler, L. (2003). Why teachers leave. In M. Scherer (Ed.), Keeping good teachers (pp. 213–218). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  58. Supovitz, J., & Christman, J. B. (2005). Small learning communities that actually learn: Lessons for school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 649–651.Google Scholar
  59. Teach For America. (2008). What we do. Our mission and approach. Available at Accessed 9 Nov 2008.
  60. Vander Ark, T. (2002). The case for small high schools. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 55–59.Google Scholar
  61. Wasley, P., Fine, M., Gladden, M., Holland, N. E., King, S. P., Mosak, E., et al. (2000). Small schools great strides: A study of new small schools in Chicago. New York: Bank Street College of Education.Google Scholar
  62. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hamalainen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2004). Pressures, rewards and teacher retention: A comparative study of primary teaching in England and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weinstein, M. G., Jacobowitz, R., Maguire, C., Saunders, T. B., & Fructer, N. (2007). Stability in student and teacher characteristics in the first ten years: A study of small high schools in New York City. New York: New York University Institute for Education and Social Policy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Department of Curriculum & InstructionSt. John’s UniversityQueensUSA
  2. 2.York College, City University of New YorkJamaicaUSA

Personalised recommendations