Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical intervention and long-term renal outcomes of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a young adult cohort

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on long-term renal outcomes for adult patients with congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Methods

We queried service members diagnosed with UPJO from the United States Military Health System electronic health records from 2005 to 2020. We assessed demographic, laboratory, radiology, surgical intervention, and outcome data. We evaluated the impact of surgical intervention on renal function based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypertension (HTN, defined as any prescription for blood pressure [BP] medication and/or average of two BP readings ≥ 130/80 mmHg more than 2 weeks apart), and changes in renal excretory function on radionuclide scans.

Results

We identified 108 individuals diagnosed with congenital UPJO; mean follow-up of 7 years. Mean age at diagnosis was 25 years; 95% male; 69% White, 15% Black. At diagnosis, median BP was 130/78 mmHg and mean eGFR 93 ml/min/1.73m2. Subsequently, 85% had pyeloplasty and 23% had stent placement. There were no significant differences in mean eGFR pre- and post-intervention (94 vs. 93 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively; p = 0.15) and prevalence of defined HTN (59% vs. 61%, respectively; p = 0.20). Surgical intervention for right-sided UPJO significantly reduced the proportion of patients with delayed cortical excretion (54% pre vs. 35% post, p = 0.01) and T½ emptying time (35 min vs. 19 min, p = 0.009). Similar trends occurred with left-sided UPJO but were not significant.

Conclusion

Surgical intervention was not associated with significant differences in the long-term outcomes of kidney function and HTN prevalence in our young adult cohort. However, renal excretory function improved on radionuclide scans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors are not allowed to share the data with a third party to protect study subject privacy.

References

  1. Khan F, Ahmed K, Lee N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2014) Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Nat Rev Urol 11(11):629–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borin JF (2017) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Rev Urol 19(4):261–264. https://doi.org/10.3909/riu0781

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arena S, Chimenz R, Antonelli E et al (2018) A long-term follow-up in conservative management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage and good renal function. Eur J Pediatr 177(12):1761–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3239-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duong HP, Piepsz A, Collier F et al (2013) Predicting the clinical outcome of antenatally detected unilateral pelviureteric junction stenosis. Urology 82(3):691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinlen JE, Manatt CS, Bright BC, Kropp BP, Campbell JB, Frimberger D (2009) Operative versus nonoperative management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urology 73(3):521–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Y, Hou Y, Niu ZB, Wang CL (2010) Long-term follow-up and management of prenatally detected, isolated hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Surg 45(8):1701–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M et al (2015) Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database. World J Urol 33(12):2107–2113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1586-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Niver BE, Agalliu I, Bareket R, Mufarrij P, Shah O, Stifelman MD (2012) Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases. Urology 79(3):689–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oberlin DT, McGuire BB, Pilecki M et al (2015) Contemporary national surgical outcomes in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 85(2):363–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W et al (2011) Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties. Urology 77(6):1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam W, Fernando A, Issa R et al (2015) Is routine postoperative diuresis renography indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction? Urology 85(1):246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elbaset MA, Zahran MH, Sharaf MA et al (2019) Long term functional success after pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteral junction obstruction in unilateral poorly functioning kidney in exclusively adults population. Urology 131:234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Mashhadi A, Häggman M, Läckgren G et al (2018) Changes of arterial pressure following relief of obstruction in adults with hydronephrosis. Upsala J Med Sci 123(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2018.1521890

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nascimento B, Andrade HS, Miranda EP, Barbosa JABA, Moscardi PR, Arap MA, Mitre AI, Srougi M, Srougi V, Duarte RJ (2021) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an alternative to nephrectomy in adults with poorly functioning kidneys due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int Urol Nephrol 53(2):269–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02626-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elbaset MA, Elmeniar AM, Sharaf MA, Ezzat O, Elgamal M, Edwan M, Badawy M, Osman Y (2021) Critical analysis of pyeloplasty role in adults with late diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction-a comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 53(10):2051–2056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02939-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Military Health System [Internet. Accessed February 6, 2024]. Available from: https://www.health.mil/About-MHS

  17. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y, Crews DC, Doria A, Estrella MM, Froissart M, Grams ME, Greene T, Grubb A, Gudnason V, Gutiérrez OM, Kalil R, Karger AB, Mauer M, Navis G, Nelson RG, Poggio ED, Rodby R, Rossing P, Rule AD, Selvin E, Seegmiller JC, Shlipak MG, Torres VE, Yang W, Ballew SH, Couture SJ, Powe NR, Levey AS (2021) Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration. new creatinine- and cystatin c-based equations to estimate gfr without race. N Engl J Med 385(19):1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA Sr, Williamson JD, Wright JT Jr (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ ASPC / NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 71(6):1269–1324. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O, Smith SC Jr, Svetkey LP, Taler SJ, Townsend RR, Wright JT Jr, Narva AS, Ortiz E (2014) 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 311(5):507–520. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlström M (2019) Hydronephrosis and risk of later development of hypertension. Acta Paediatr 108(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davison JM, Uldall PR, Walls J (1976) Renal function studies after nephrectomy in renal donors. Br Med J 1(6017):1050–1052. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kasiske BL, Anderson-Haag T, Israni AK, Kalil RS, Kimmel PL, Kraus ES, Kumar R, Posselt AA, Pesavento TE, Rabb H, Steffes MW, Snyder JJ, Weir MR (2015) A prospective controlled study of living kidney donors: three-year follow-up. Am J Kidney Dis 66(1):114–124. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sivaraman A, Leveillee RJ, Patel MB, Chauhan S, Bracho JE 2nd, Moore CR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Schatloff O, Bird VG, Munver R, Patel VR (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. Urology 79(2):351–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nayyar R, Yadav S, Singh P, Kumar R, Seth A, Dogra PN (2016) Outcomes of pyeloplasty in very poorly functioning kidneys: examining the myths. Urology 92:132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Merder E, Arıman A, Sabuncu K, Altunrende F (2021) Functional, morphological and operative outcome after pyeloplasty in adult patients: laparoscopic versus open. Urologia 88(3):227–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391560320987921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fwu CW, Barthold JS, Mendley SR, Bennett K, Chan K, Wilkins KJ, Parsa A, Norton JM, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Schulman IH, Kirkali Z (2024) Epidemiology of infantile ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the US. Urology. 183:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Sarah Khan, MD, Erin Parker, MD, and John Thurlow, MD for their contributions to this study. We also appreciate the advice from our urology colleagues, Thomas Gerald, MD and Brock Boehm, MD.

Funding

The authors did not receive any funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: ARS, SWO, RN; Methodology: ARS, SWO, BLL, MAW, CMY, RN; Formal analysis and investigation: ARS, SWO, RN; Writing-original draft preparation: ARS, RN; Writing-review and editing: ARS, SWO, BLL, MAW, CMY, RN; Supervision: RN.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Nee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing financial or non-financial interests related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. Stephen W. Olson, MD is currently an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, A.R., Olson, S.W., Lechner, B.L. et al. Surgical intervention and long-term renal outcomes of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a young adult cohort. Int Urol Nephrol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04075-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04075-9

Keywords

Navigation