Abstract
Background
Previous observational studies have shown an association between certain cancers and the subsequent risk of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the causal relationship between these cancers and PCa is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between 12 common cancers and the risk of PCa.
Methods
We employed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to perform forward and reverse Mendelian randomization (MR) within two-sample frameworks. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable MR analyses to investigate the relationships between different types of cancer. In addition, multiple sensitivity analysis methods were employed to assess the robustness of our findings.
Results
Our univariable MR analysis showed that genetically predicted hematological cancer was associated with a reduced risk of PCa (OR: 0.911, 95% CI 0.89–0.922, P = 0.03). Furthermore, MR analysis demonstrates that genetically predicted occurrence of thyroid gland and endocrine gland cancer also raised the risk of PCa (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that thyroid gland cancer exhibited a higher incidence of PCa (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16, P = 0.008). In the reverse MR analysis, we found no significant inverse causal associations between PCa and 12 types of cancers.
Conclusion
In summary, this study provided insights into the causal relationships between various types of cancer and PCa. Hematological cancer was suggested to associate with a lower risk of PCa, while thyroid gland cancer and endocrine gland cancer might increase the risk. These findings contribute to the understanding of genetic factors related to PCa and its potential associations with other cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2022) Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 72(1):7–33
Clift AK, Drymousis P, Al-Nahhas A, Wasan H, Martin J, Holm S et al (2015) Incidence of second primary malignancies in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 102(1–2):26–32
Molina-Montes E, Requena M, Sánchez-Cantalejo E, Fernández MF, Arroyo-Morales M, Espín J et al (2015) Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 136(1):158–171
Collatuzzo G, Ferrante M, Ippolito A, Di Prima A, Colarossi C, Scarpulla S et al (2022) Second primary cancers following colorectal cancer in Sicily, Italy. Cancers 14(21):1
Sung H, Hyun N, Leach CR, Yabroff KR, Jemal A (2020) Association of first primary cancer with risk of subsequent primary cancer among survivors of adult-onset cancers in the United States. JAMA 324(24):2521–2535
Nguyen-Nielsen M, Borre M (2016) Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer. Semin Nucl Med 46(6):484–490
Chattopadhyay S, Zheng G, Hemminki O, Försti A, Sundquist K, Hemminki K (2018) Prostate cancer survivors: risk and mortality in second primary cancers. Cancer Med 7(11):5752–5759
Zhang H, Bermejo JL, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2009) Prostate cancer as a first and second cancer: effect of family history. Br J Cancer 101(6):935–939
Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Coulange C (2007) Renal cancer and second cancer: critical review of the literature. Progres en urologie: journal de l’Association francaise d’urologie et de la Societe francaise d’urologie 17(1):35–40
Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG (2013) Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol 37(7):658–665
Schumacher FR, Al Olama AA, Berndt SI, Benlloch S, Ahmed M, Saunders EJ et al (2018) Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 50(7):928–936
Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D et al (2018) The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife 7:1
Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey SG (2018) Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum Mol Genet 27(R2):R195-r208
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S (2016) Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol 40(4):304–314
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 44(2):512–525
Tomaszewski JJ, Uzzo RG, Egleston B, Corcoran AT, Mehrazin R, Geynisman DM et al (2015) Coupling of prostate and thyroid cancer diagnoses in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 22(3):1043–1049
Davis EJ, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Yee CL, Cooney KA (2014) Risk of second primary tumors in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. Cancer 120(17):2735–2741
Ho AS, Daskivich TJ, Sacks WL, Zumsteg ZS (2019) Parallels between low-risk prostate cancer and thyroid cancer: a review. JAMA Oncol 5(4):556–564
Subramanian S, Goldstein DP, Parlea L, Thabane L, Ezzat S, Ibrahim-Zada I et al (2007) Second primary malignancy risk in thyroid cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc 17(12):1277–1288
Withrow DR, Schonfeld SJ, Curtis RE, Morton LM, Cook MB, Butler EN et al (2020) Racial and ethnic differences in risk of second primary cancers among prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control CCC 31(11):1011–1019
Cho YY, Lim J, Oh CM, Ryu J, Jung KW, Chung JH et al (2015) Elevated risks of subsequent primary malignancies in patients with thyroid cancer: a nationwide, population-based study in Korea. Cancer 121(2):259–268
Joung JY, Lim J, Oh CM, Jung KW, Cho H, Kim SH et al (2015) Risk of second primary cancer among prostate cancer patients in Korea: a population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0140693
Davey Smith G, Hemani G (2014) Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet 23(R1):R89-98
Yarmolinsky J, Wade KH, Richmond RC, Langdon RJ, Bull CJ, Tilling KM et al (2018) Causal inference in cancer epidemiology: what is the role of Mendelian randomization? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27(9):995–1010
Swerdlow DI, Kuchenbaecker KB, Shah S, Sofat R, Holmes MV, White J et al (2016) Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol 45(5):1600–1616
Jin L, Xu L, Song X, Wei Q, Sturgis EM, Li G (2012) Genetic variation in MDM2 and p14ARF and susceptibility to salivary gland carcinoma. PLoS ONE 7(11):e49361
Cybulski C, Górski B, Huzarski T, Masojć B, Mierzejewski M, Debniak T et al (2004) CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet 75(6):1131–1135
Petranović Ovčariček P, Verburg FA, Hoffmann M, Iakovou I, Mihailovic J, Vrachimis A et al (2021) Higher thyroid hormone levels and cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(3):808–821
Costa AR, Lança de Oliveira M, Cruz I, Gonçalves I, Cascalheira JF, Santos CRA (2020) The sex bias of cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 31(10):785–799
Imai Y, Yamakawa M, Matsuda M, Kasajima T (1989) Endogenous sex hormone and estrogen binding activity in thyroid cancer. Histol Histopathol 4(1):39–45
Sanderson E (2021) Multivariable Mendelian randomization and mediation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med 11(2):1
Burgess S, Thompson SG (2015) Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am J Epidemiol 181(4):251–260
Acknowledgements
This statement is to certify that all authors have approved the manuscript being submitted, have contributed significantly to the work, and attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation.
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XZ, TC, and SX were responsible for data collection and analysis. The manuscript was written by SL, XD, SX, BF, and JD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There were no conflicts of interest in this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The data is publicly available and ethics approval is not required.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhan, X., Chen, T., Xiong, S. et al. Causal relationship between prostate cancer and 12 types of cancers: multivariable and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses. Int Urol Nephrol 56, 547–556 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03793-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03793-w