Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Operative duration as independent predictor of increased postoperative healthcare utilization

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have examined the risk factors for postoperative healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN), minimally invasive prostatectomy (MIP), and cystectomy (Cx). The aim of this study is to assess if operative duration (OD) is a predictor of HRU in this population.

Methods

The ACS-NSQIP database was filtered for MIPN, MIP, and Cx. Patient characteristics and intraoperative variables were examined. HRU was defined as prolonged length of stay (LOS), unplanned readmission within 30 days, and discharge to continued care facility. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of HRU.

Results

18,904 MIPN, 50,807 MIP, and 12,451 Cx were included. For MIPN, HRU was seen in 13.9% of cases < 1.75 h, increasing to 36.2% in OD > 4.5 h (p < 0.001). For MIP, HRU was seen in 10.6% of OD < 2 h, increasing to 32.2% for OD > 4.9 h (p < 0.001). For Cx, 57% of those with OD > 8.5 h required HRU compared to 42.1% for OD < 3.3 h (p < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, OD was an independent predictor for increased HRU for all procedures regardless of patient characteristics or comorbidities. For MIPN, OD > 4.5 h had 3.5-fold increased use of HRU (p < 0.001). For MIP, OD > 5 h had 3.7-fold increased use of HRU (p < 0.001). For Cx, OD > 8.5 h demonstrated a twofold increased use of HRU (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

OD during MIPN, MIP, and Cx is an independent predictor of increased HRU irrespective of patient comorbidities. Patients with OD > 4.5 h for MIPN, > 5 h for MIP, and > 8.5 h for Cx have 3.5-fold, 3.7-fold, and twofold increased risk of HRU, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, ST.

References

  1. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B et al (2018) Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 229:134–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng H, Po-Han Chen B, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P (2017) Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: A systematic review. Surg Infect 18(6):722–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB (2010) General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):60-65.e1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy KL, Davis KE, Constantine RS et al (2014) The impact of operative time on complications after plastic surgery: a multivariate regression analysis of 1753 cases. Aesthet Surg J 34(4):614–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Golebiowski A, Drewes C, Gulati S, Jakola AS, Solheim O (2015) Is duration of surgery a risk factor for extracranial complications and surgical site infections after intracranial tumor operations? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157(2):235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris AM, James A, Dugan A, Bylund J (2019) Increased operative duration in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is associated with significantly increased risk of 30-day morbidity. J Endourol 33(7):549–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang KH, Kaplan AL, Carter SC, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC (2014) The impact of radical prostatectomy operative time on outcomes and costs. Urology 83(6):1265–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan WS, Lamb BW, Kelly JD (2015) Complications of radical cystectomy and orthotopic reconstruction. Adv Urol 2015:323157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. McBride A, McKibben MJ, Vukina J et al (2014) Longer operative times predict increased length of stay after cystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 219(3):S146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor BL, Xia L, Guzzo TJ, Scherr DS, Hu JC (2019) Frailty and greater health care resource utilization following major urologic oncology surgery. Eur Urol Oncol 2(1):21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Butt ZM, Fazili A, Tan W et al (2009) Does the presence of significant risk factors affect perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy? BJU Int 104(7):986–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris AM, James A, Dugan A, Bylund J (2020) Increased operative duration of minimally invasive prostatectomy is associated with significantly increased risk of 30-Day morbidity. Urol Pract 7(1):21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CG, Davenport DL, Gorski J et al (2019) Clinical factors associated with longer hospital stay following ovarian cancer surgery. Healthcare 7(3):85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiu HC, Lin YC, Hsieh HM, Chen HP, Wang HL, Wang JY (2017) The impact of complications on prolonged length of hospital stay after resection in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of Taiwanese patients. J Int Med Res 45(2):691–705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Osborn DJ, Dmochowski RR, Kaufman MR, Milam DF, Mock S, Reynolds WS (2014) Cystectomy with urinary diversion for benign disease: indications and outcomes. Urology 83(6):1433–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Routh JC, Bacon DR, Leibovich BC, Zincke H, Blute ML, Frank I (2008) How long is too long? The effect of the duration of anaesthesia on the incidence of non-urological complications after surgery. BJU Int 102(3):301–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehtonen EJ, Hess MC, McGwin G Jr, Shah A, Godoy-Santos AL, Narange S (2018) Risk factors for early hospital readmission following total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras 26(5):309–313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta PK, Fernandes-Taylor S, Ramanan B, Engelbert TL, Kent KC (2014) Unplanned readmissions after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 59(2):473–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baack Kukreja J, Kamat AM (2017) Strategies to minimize readmission rates following major urologic surgery. Ther Adv Urol 9(5):111–119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Suskind AM, Jin C, Cooperberg MR et al (2016) Preoperative frailty is associated with discharge to skilled or assisted living facilities after urologic procedures of varying complexity. Urology 97:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Divatia J, Ranganathan P (2015) Can we improve operating room efficiency? J Postgrad Med 61(1):1–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 6 Cornerstones of Operating Room Efficiency: Best Practices for Each. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/or-efficiencies/6-cornerstones-of-operating-room-efficiency-best-practices-for-each.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2020

  23. Welk B, Winick-Ng J, McClure A, Vinden C, Dave S, Pautler S (2016) The impact of teaching on the duration of common urological operations. Can Urol Assoc J 10(5–6):172–178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive financial support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JPM: Manuscript writing/editing. ST: Project development, manuscript editing. AB: Data analysis, AH: Project development, data collecting/management, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth Teplitsky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board and the approval number: N/A. This is an observational study using a de-identified database. No formal IRB approval or other ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

N/A. Due to the de-identified nature of the database used in this study, informed consent was not required to obtain data. Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.

Animal studies

Not available.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morin, J., Teplitsky, S., Bettis, A. et al. Operative duration as independent predictor of increased postoperative healthcare utilization. Int Urol Nephrol 56, 23–28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03785-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03785-w

Keywords

Navigation