Abstract
Purpose
To study the efficacy and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter removal using the pull technique.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 36 patients in whom the pull technique was used to remove a PD catheter. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and health economic benefits of this technique by analyzing the pain score, duration of the procedure, complications during or after the procedure, and cost.
Results
The mean age (± standard deviation) of the 36 patients was 51 ± 14 years involving 27 males and 9 females with a mean body mass index was 23.4 ± 2.6. The mean duration of PD was 28 months (range 4–96 months). The site of the pull technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter removal was at the bedside or in the treatment room, with local anesthesia or no anesthesia. The mean duration of the procedure (from anesthesia to complete removal of the PD catheter) was 5–15 min. Only one patient experienced catheter rupture and no patients developed procedural or post-procedural bleeding or abdominal wall leakage. Infection did not occur at the inner or outer cuffs, tunnel, or outlet. Pain scores analyzed by a 10-point visual analogue scoring technique both immediately and 24 h after the procedure were 3.5 ± 1.7 and 1.2 ± 0.8, respectively.
Conclusions
The pull technique is simple to perform, takes a short time, results in few complications and small wounds, causes only mild pain, enables fast recovery, and results in low medical costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ash SR (2003) Interventional nephrology and dialysis: chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: overview of design, placement, and removal procedures. Semin Dial 16:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2003.16062.x
Korzets Z, Hasdan G, Bulkan G, Klein E, Bernheim J, Shpitz B (2000) Early postoperative complications of removal of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 20:789–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/089686080002000636
Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow K-M, Figueiredo AE, Povlsen JV, Wilkie M, Abdel-Aal A, Cullis B, Goh B-L, Briggs VR, Brown EA, Dor FJMF (2019) Creating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient: 2019 update. Perit Dial Int 39:414–436. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00232
Quiroga IM, Baboo R, Lord RH, Darby CR (2001) Tenckhoff catheters post-renal transplantation: the ‘pull’ technique? Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:2079–2081. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/16.10.2079
Hakim NS, Pirenne J, Benedetti E, Matas AJ (1995) A technique of removal of the Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. J Am Coll Surg 180:350–352
Grieff M, Mamo E, Scroggins G, Kurchin A (2017) The ‘pull’ technique for removal of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a call for re-evaluation of practice standards. Perit Dial Int 37:225–229. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00152
Lu N, Fu S-X, Tan H-B (2019) A case of leakage of abdominal wall at the original tube after removal of the peritoneal dialysis tube by hand. Chin J IMod Med 29:127–128. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2019.17.026
Elkabir JJ, Riaz AA, Agarwal SK, Williams G (1999) Delayed complications following Tenckhoff catheter removal. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1550–1552. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/14.6.1550
Wang J, Li X-S, Zhang F-X, Wang R-X, Cao F, Tang X-H, Chen X-Q, Hong B (2020) Minimally invasive ‘pull technique’ for peritoneal dialysis catheter removal. Perit Dial Int 41:118–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820915022
Acknowledgements
We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for linguistic assistance and pre-submission expert review.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Programmes of China (2018YFC0114503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All of the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by XM, YZ, ST, JZ, LY, and YG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LZ and edited by FS. All of the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, and the ethical approval number was (2021)LunShen#154.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for their anonymized information to be published in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Ma, X., Zheng, Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of removing peritoneal dialysis catheters using the pull technique. Int Urol Nephrol 56, 1129–1135 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03761-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03761-4