Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution of healthcare costs for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With the ubiquity of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) in older men, costs related to this highly prevalent disease are likely significant but not well defined. With this study, we hoped to define costs related to LUTS/BPH care.

Methods

We utilized the Optum© de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM) for privately insured male enrollees aged 40–64 years with LUTS/BPH (N ≈ 100,300 annually) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare 5% Sample for male beneficiaries aged 65 + years with LUTS/BPH (N ≈ 147,800 annually). Annual LUTS/BPH-related expenditures from 2004 to 2013 were age standardized and calculated overall and by age and service location.

Results

The Medicare cohort demonstrated a 23% increase in total costs over the study period with a 28% decrease in CDM costs. Decreases in inpatient hospital charges (45% for Medicare, 55% for CDM) were offset by increasing hospital-based outpatient fees (120% for Medicare, 87% for CDM). Overall, we estimated a total cost of at least $1.9 billion for treatment of men with LUTS/BPH for 2013. Per person expenditures increased with age within cohorts with an average per-person cost of $269 (CDM) and $248 (Medicare) in 2013.

Conclusion

The distribution of healthcare expenditures for LUTS/BPH shifted across practice settings from 2004 to 2013, with increasing outpatient relative to inpatient expenditures. Total direct costs for LUTS/BPH in 2013 were at least $1.9 billion, not accounting for indirect costs or certain unmeasured populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

© Clinformatics® Data Mart enrolles with LUTS/BPH, by year and service location, 2004–2013

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

© Clinformatics® Data Mart enrollees with Medicare beneficiaries with LUTS/BPH, by age, 2004–2013

Fig. 4

© Clinformatics® Data Mart (CMD) enrollees and Medicare beneficiaries with LUTS/BPH, by age, 2004–2013

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartman M, Martin AB, Benson J et al (2020) National Health Care spending in 2018: growth driven by accelerations in medicare and private insurance spending. Health Aff (Millwood) 39:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saigal CS, Joyce G (2005) Economic costs of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the private sector. J Urol 173:1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Welliver C, Feinstein L, Ward JB et al (2019) Trends in lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia, 2004–2013: the urologic diseases in America project. J Urol 203:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. United States Renal Data System (2018) USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Census Bureau. "S0101: Age and Sex." 2010 American Community Survey: U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office, 2011.

  6. Wei JT, Calhoun E, Jacobsen SJ (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 173:1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CPI inflation calculator. bls.gov. Accessed January 2, 2022.

Download references

Funding

The Urologic Diseases in America project was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) through a contract to Social & Scientific Systems (HHSN276201500204U). The data reported here have been supplied [in part] by the United States Renal Data System (USRDS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

CW: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. LF: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis. JBW: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. ZK: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. EM-M: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis. BRM: protocol/project development, data collection or management. KM: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Welliver.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Julia Ward and Lydia Feinstein are employed by NociSci Inc. Erline Martinez-Miller is employed by Social & Scientific Systems. Dr. Brian Matlaga of John’s Hopkins University has a subcontract with Social & Scientific Systems. Welliver: Medscape, Oakstone publishing: compensated CEM content creation. Matlaga: Boston Scientific: Consultant. McVary: NxThera: Consultant, investigator. ProDean: Consultant, investigator. NIDDK: Investigator, consultant. Antares: principal investigator. Boston Scientific: fellowship grant, investigator.

Ethics statement for research involving human subjects

This is a retrospective and observational study utilizing de-identified information. The Copernicus Group Independent Review Board® designated this project exempt from review.

Informed consent statement

Informed consent was not able to be obtained from any study participants as data was obtained in a de-identified format.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the U.S. government.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix A. ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes indicative of BPH

Code

Description

594.1

Other calculus in bladder

599.6

Urinary obstruction

599.60

Urinary obstruction, unspecified

599.69

Urinary obstruction, not elsewhere classified

600

Hyperplasia of prostate

600.0

Hypertrophy (benign) of prostate

600.00

Hypertrophy (benign) of prostate without urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

600.01

Hypertrophy (benign) of prostate with urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

600.1

Nodular prostate

600.10

Nodular prostate without urinary obstruction

600.11

Nodular prostate with urinary obstruction

600.2

Benign localized hyperplasia of prostate

600.20

Benign localized hyperplasia of prostate without urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

600.21

Benign localized hyperplasia of prostate with urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

600.9

Hyperplasia of prostate, unspecified

600.90

Hyperplasia of prostate, unspecified, without urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

600.91

Hyperplasia of prostate, unspecified, with urinary obstruction and other lower urinary tract symptoms

  1. ICD-9-CM International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, BPH benign prostatic hyperplasia

Appendix B. Place of service definitions for Medicare and CDM claims

Place of service

Medicare 5% Sample

CDM

Inpatient hospital

Any claim from the inpatient (IP) files OR

Any non-institutional claim with a place of service of “inpatient hospital”

Any claim from the Inpatient Confinement tables OR

Any claim from the Medical tables with a place of service of “inpatient hospital”

Hospital-based outpatient

Any claim from the hospital outpatient (OP) files OR

Any non-institutional claim with a place of service of “outpatient hospital”, “emergency room”, or “ambulatory surgical center”

Any claim from the Medical tables with a place of service of “outpatient hospital”, “emergency room”, or “ambulatory surgical center”

Physician office

Any non-institutional claim with a place of service of “office”

Any claim from the Medical tables with a place of service of “office”

Other

Any claim not described above

Any claim not described above

  1. CDM Optum© De-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welliver, C., Feinstein, L., Ward, J.B. et al. Evolution of healthcare costs for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int Urol Nephrol 54, 2797–2803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03296-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03296-0

Keywords

Navigation