References
Shi Y, Li W, Duan F et al (2022) Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Urol Nephrol 54:553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02913-8
Lockwood C, Pearson AS (2013) A comparison of meta-aggregation and meta-ethnography as qualitative review methods, 1st edn
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding to this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, X., Zhan, C. Comment on “Factors promoting shared decision‑making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end‑stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta‑synthesis”. Int Urol Nephrol 54, 3039–3040 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03187-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03187-4