Abstract
Purpose
The literature assessing outcomes of partial adrenalectomy (PA) among patients with pheochromocytoma patients is largely limited to isolated, single-institution series. We aimed to perform a population-level comparison of outcomes between patients undergoing PA versus those undergoing total adrenalectomy (TA).
Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1975–2016) was queried to identify adults with pheochromocytoma who underwent either PA or TA. Survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, Fine and Gray competing-risks regression, propensity score matching, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and cumulative incidence plots.
Results
286 patients (PA: 101, TA: 185) were included in this study. As compared to those undergoing TA, patients undergoing PA had fewer tumors ≥ 8 cm in size (28.7% versus 42.7%, p = 0.048) and were more likely to have localized disease (61.4% versus 44.3%, p = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, patients undergoing PA demonstrated similar all-cause mortality (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44–1.14, p = 0.16) and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.35–1.17, p = 0.15) compared to those who underwent TA. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no difference in overall survival between PA and TA groups (p = 0.26) nor was there a difference in the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality (p = 0.29).
Conclusions
In this first population-level comparison of outcomes among patients with pheochromocytoma undergoing PA and those undergoing TA, we found no long-term differences in any survival metric between groups. PA circumvents the need for lifelong corticoid replacement therapy and remains a promising option for patients with bilateral or recurrent pheochromocytoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Publicly available dataset.
Code availability
Available on reasonable request to authors.
References
Madala A, Daugherty M, Bratslavsky G (2015) Partial adrenalectomy—why should it be considered? Urol Pract 2:1–8
Neumann HP, Reincke M, Bender BU, Elsner R, Janetschek G (1999) Preserved adrenocortical function after laparoscopic bilateral adrenal sparing surgery for hereditary pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2608–2610
Mazziotti G, Formenti AM, Frara S et al (2017) Management of endocrine disease: risk of overtreatment in patients with adrenal insufficiency: current and emerging aspects. Eur J Endocrinol 177(5):R231–R248
Nakada T, Kubota Y, Sasagawa I et al (1995) Therapeutic outcome of primary aldosteronism: adrenalectomy versus enucleation of aldosterone-producing adenoma. J Urol 153:1775
Ball MW, Allaf ME (2014) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy (total, partial, & metastasectomy). Urol Clin North Am 41(4):539–547
Kaye DR, Storey BB, Pacak K, Pinto PA, Linehan WM, Bratslavsky G (2010) Partial adrenalectomy: underused first line therapy for small adrenal tumors. J Urol 184(1):18–25
Stefanidis D, Goldfarb M, Kercher KW et al (2013) SAGES guidelines for minimally invasive treatment of adrenal pathology. Surg Endosc 27(11):3960–3980
Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G et al (2014) Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(6):1915–1942
Janetschek G, Lhotta K, Gasser R, Finkenstedt G, Jaschke W, Bartsch G (1997) Adrenal-sparing laparoscopic surgery for aldosterone-producing adenoma. J Endourol 11(2):145–148
St Julien J, Ball D, Schulick R (2006) Robot-assisted cortical-sparing adrenalectomy in a patient with Von Hippel-Lindau disease and bilateral pheochromocytomas separated by 9 years. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(5):473–477
Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Edirimanne S (2015) Recurrence and functional outcomes of partial adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 16(Pt A):7–13
Gomella PT, Sanford TH, Pinto PA et al (2020) Long-term functional and oncologic outcomes of partial adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Urology 140:85–90
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/aceappendixb_surveillanceepidemiologyandendresults.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2020
Fishbein L, Orlowski R, Cohen D (2013) Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: Review of perioperative management of blood pressure and update on genetic mutations associated with pheochromocytoma. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 15(6):428–434
Chandrasekar T, Goldberg H, Klaassen Z et al (2019) The who, when, and why of primary adrenal malignancies: Insights into the epidemiology of a rare clinical entity. Cancer 125(7):1050–1059
Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:p496-509
Rubin DB, Thomas N (1996) Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics 52(1):249–264
Sussman RD, Peyronnet B, Brucker BM (2019) The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Turk J Urol 45(5):331–339
Fishbein L, Leshchiner I, Walter V et al (2017) Comprehensive molecular characterization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Cancer Cell 31(2):181–193
Neumann HPH, Tsoy U, Bancos I et al (2019) Comparison of pheochromocytoma-specific morbidity and mortality among adults with bilateral pheochromocytomas undergoing total adrenalectomy vs cortical-sparing adrenalectomy. JAMA Netw Open 2(8):e198898
NCCN Guidelines: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, 2020. Available at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx. Accessed 28 Aug 2020
Giordano SH, Kuo YF, Duan Z, Hortobagyi GN, Freeman J, Goodwin JS (2008) Limits of observational data in determining outcomes from cancer therapy. Cancer 112(11):2456–2466
Amar L, Servais A, Gimenez-roqueplo AP, Zinzindohoue F, Chatellier G, Plouin PF (2005) Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(4):2110–2116
George A, Mensah GS, Wei PD, Sorlie LJ, Fine Y, Rosenberg PG, Kaufmann ME, Mussolino LL, Hsu E, Addou MM, Gordon ED (2017) Decline in cardiovascular mortality. Circul Res 120(2):366-380. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309115
Shiko AT, Katabami M, Tsuiki Y, Naruse TN (2017) Controlling tumor progression with cyclophosphamide vincristine and dacarbazine treatment improves survival in patients with metastatic and unresectable malignant pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Hormones Cancer 8(2):108–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-017-0284-7
Hao KN, Li J, Tian Z, Bao L, Liu K, Wu Y, Gao B, Jin Z, Zhang D, Fang J, Zhou ZL (2020) The use of doxazosin before adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: is the duration related to intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications? Int Urol Nephrol 52(11):2079–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02539-2
Junya HN, Haga K, Ishibashi N, Takahashi S, Ogawa M, Kataoka H, Akaihata Y, Satoh T, Kojima KY (2014) Sunitinib for refractory malignant pheochromocytoma: two case reports. Int Urol Nephrol 46(7):1309–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0663-8
Prejbisz A, Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Januszewicz A (2013) Mortality associated with phaeochromocytoma. Hormone Metabol Res 45(02):154–158. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1331217
Funding
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, NIH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhambhvani, H.P., Daneshvar, M.A., Peterson, D.J. et al. Partial versus total adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a population-based comparison of outcomes. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 2485–2492 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-03004-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-03004-4