Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of the mayo adhesive probability score as a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case–control study

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Whether the Mayo adhesive probability score, an index of the perinephric fat environment, could be a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy was investigated.

Methods

A retrospective case–control study of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed. An estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rate at ≤ 90% at 3 months after surgery was defined as postoperative renal function deterioration. These patients were divided into two groups (non-deterioration and deterioration groups). Patient factors including Mayo adhesive probability scores (both tumor and unaffected sides) and surgical factors were evaluated to identify the predictors for postoperative renal function deterioration. The statistical analysis used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

Thirty-seven (47.4%) patients had postoperative renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy. Univariate analysis identified Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (p = 0.02), and warm ischemia time (p < 0.01) as predictors of postoperative renal function deterioration. On multivariate analyses, Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (odds ratio: 1.38 [1.05–1.79], p = 0.02) and warm ischemia time (odds ratio: 1.04 [1.01–1.07], p < 0.01) were significantly associated with postoperative renal function deterioration as same as univariate analysis. On receive operating characteristic curve analysis, Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side (cutoff value 1.5; p = 0.02) and warm ischemia time (cutoff value 26.5 min; p = 0.01) were significant predictors of renal function deterioration 3 month after surgery.

Conclusion

The Mayo adhesive probability score on the unaffected side and warm ischemia time are useful predictors for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy.

Trial registration number

2019-249, January 21st, 2019, retrospectively registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y et al (2019) European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol 75:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS (2013) “Trifecta” in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 189:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DK, Kim LH, Raheem AA et al (2016) Comparison of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes between T1a and T1b renal masses following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with minimum one year follow up: can RAPN for T1b renal masses be feasible? PLoS ONE 11:e0151738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lane BR, Demirjian S, Derweesh IH et al (2015) Survival and functional stability in chronic kidney disease due to surgical removal of nephrons: importance of the new baseline glomerular filtration rate. Eur Urol 68:996–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin TY, Komninos C, Kim DW et al (2015) A novel mathematical model to predict the severity of postoperative functional reduction before partial nephrectomy: the importance of calculating resected and ischemic volume. J Urol 193:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Komninos C, Shin TY, Tuliao P et al (2015) Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique: analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. BJU Int 115:921–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocher NJ, Rjepaj C, Robyak H et al (2017) Hypertension is the primary component of metabolic syndrome associated with pathologic features of kidney cancer. World J Urol 35:67–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall JE, Henegar JR, Dwyer TM et al (2004) Is obesity a major cause of chronic kidney disease? Adv Ren Replace Ther 11:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ting SM, Nair H, Ching I et al (2009) Overweight, obesity and chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract 112:c121–c127 (discussion c127)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall JE, do Carmo JM, da Silva AA et al (2019) Obesity, kidney dysfunction and hypertension: mechanistic links. Nat Rev Nephrol 15:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maimaituxun G, Fukuda D, Izaki H (2019) Levels of adiponectin expression in peri-renal and subcutaneous adipose tissue and its determinants in human biopsied samples. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10:897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davidiuk AJ, Parker AS, Thomas CS et al (2014) Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 66:1165–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bravi CA, Vertosick E, Benfante N et al (2019) Impact of acute kidney injury and its duration on long-term renal function after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 76:398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thiel DD, Davidiuk AJ, Meschia C et al (2016) Mayo adhesive probability score is associated with localized renal cell carcinoma progression-free survival. Urology 89:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park YH, Lee JK, Kim KM et al (2014) Visceral obesity in predicting oncologic outcomes of localized renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 192:1043–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keehn A, Srivastava A, Maiman R et al (2015) The relationship between visceral obesity and the clinicopathologic features of patients with small renal masses. J Endourol 29:372–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Lam KS, Xu JY et al (2005) Adiponectin inhibits cell proliferation by interacting with several growth factors in an oligomerization-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 280:18341–18347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanks LJ, Casazza K, Judd SE (2015) Associations of fibroblast growth factor-23 with markers of inflammation, insulin resistance and obesity in adults. PLoS ONE 10:e0122885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemoine AY, Ledoux S, Larger E (2013) Adipose tissue angiogenesis in obesity. Thromb Haemost 110:661–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hotamisligil GS (2006) Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature 444:860–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li G, Huang W, Xu Q et al (2019) Application value of dual-energy computed tomography spectrum curve combined with clinical risk factors in predicting adherent perinephric fat. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9:1421–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jungwirth N, Haeberle L, Schrott KM et al (2008) Serotonin used as prognostic marker of urological tumors. World J Urol 26:499–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen L, Chen G, Guo Y et al (2014) Ketanserin, a serotonin 2A receptor antagonist, alleviates ischemia-related biliary fibrosis following donation after cardiac death liver transplantation in rats. Liver Transpl 20:1317–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bertolo R, Garisto J, Li J et al (2019) Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting renal function after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2:106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin L, Rouviere O, Bezza R et al (2017) Mayo adhesive probability score is an independent computed tomography scan predictor of adherent perinephric fat in open partial nephrectomy. Urology 103:124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HJ: project development and manuscript writing, MY, OA, HR: data collection. MK, SY, AH, OS, KM: data collection and data analysis, HT, KY: manuscript writing/editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junya Hata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The present study’s retrospective protocol was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and protocols approved by the ethics Committee of Fukushima Medical University (# 2019-249).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hata, J., Matsuoka, Y., Onagi, A. et al. Usefulness of the mayo adhesive probability score as a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case–control study. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 2281–2288 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02986-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02986-5

Keywords

Navigation