Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of marital and socioeconomic status on quality of life and physical activity in patients with chronic kidney disease

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Quality of life (QOL) and physical activity (PA) is reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim was to investigate the impact of marital status and educational level on QOL and PA in patients with CKD including dialysis treatment.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included ambulatory adult patients undergoing dialysis or CKD stage 4–5. Data for marital status, educational level and PA were obtained using the Danish health and Morbidity Survey. QOL was assessed using the Physical Component Scale and the Mental Component Scale scores from the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument.

Results

Five hundred twelve participants were included: 316 (62%) were married/had a permanent partner, 119 (23%) had a low level of education, 327 (67%) were physically active. After confounder adjustments (age, sex, treatment), having a permanent partner was associated with greater scores in Mental Component Scale, β 2.88 [CI 95% 0.99; 4.77], p = 0.003, and being physically active in women OR 2.237 [1.231; 4.066], p = 0.008. A high vs low educational level was associated with greater scores in Physical Component Scale (3.79 [1.01; 6.58], p = 0.008) and in Mental Component Scale (3.55 [0.82; 6.28], p = 0.011).

Conclusion

In ambulatory patients with CKD stage 4–5, being married or having a permanent partner and a high educational level had positive impacts on mental QOL. Higher educational level was also associated with better physical QOL. The presented inequality in QOL should be considered in communications, care and treatments in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knudsen Sde P, Eidemak I, Molsted S (2016) Health related quality of life in 2002 and 2015 in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a single center study. Ren Fail 38(8):1234–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowney AC, Myles HT, Bristowe K et al (2015) Understanding what influences the health-related quality of life of hemodialysis patients: a collaborative study in England and Ireland. J Pain Symptom Manag 50(6):778–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Molsted S, Prescott L, Heaf J, Eidemak I (2007) Assessment and clinical aspects of health-related quality of life in dialysis patients and patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract 106(1):c24-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Molsted S, Eidemak I (2020) Musculoskeletal pain reported by mobile patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 13:sfz196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Molsted S, Bjorkman ASD, Lundstrom LH (2019) Effects of strength training to patients undergoing dialysis: a systematic review. Dan Med J 66(1):A5526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes Neto M, de Lacerda FFR, Lopes AA, Martinez BP, Saquetto MB (2018) Intradialytic exercise training modalities on physical functioning and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 32(9):1189–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salhab N, Karavetian M, Kooman J, Fiaccadori E, El Khoury CF (2019) Effects of intradialytic aerobic exercise on hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol 32(4):549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung YC, Yeh ML, Liu YM (2017) Effects of intradialytic exercise on the physical function, depression and quality of life for haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 26(13–14):1801–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheng K, Zhang P, Chen L, Cheng J, Wu C, Chen J (2014) Intradialytic exercise in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Nephrol 40(5):478–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Kutner NG, Dalrymple LS, Grimes BA, Kaysen GA (2010) Low level of self-reported physical activity in ambulatory patients new to dialysis. Kidney Int 78(11):1164–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tentori F, Elder SJ, Thumma J et al (2010) Physical exercise among participants in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): correlates and associated outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25(9):3050–3062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkins MS, Sevick MA, Richardson CR, Fried LF, Arena VC, Kriska AM (2011) Association between physical activity and kidney function: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43(8):1457–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen BK, Saltin B (2015) Exercise as medicine—evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25(Suppl 3):1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams K, Umberson D (2004) Marital status, marital transitions, and health: a gendered life course perspective. J Health Soc Behav 45(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagedoorn M, Van Yperen NW, Coyne JC et al (2006) Does marriage protect older people from distress? The role of equity and recency of bereavement. Psychol Aging 21(3):611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldman N (2001) Social inequalities in health disentangling the underlying mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 954:118–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cobb LK, Godino JG, Selvin E, Kucharska-Newton A, Coresh J, Koton S (2016) Spousal influence on physical activity in middle-aged and older adults: the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol 183(5):444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diderichsen F, Andersen I, Manuel C et al (2012) Health inequality–determinants and policies. Scand J Public Health 40(8 Suppl):12–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiotz ML, Stockmarr A, Host D, Glumer C, Frolich A (2017) Social disparities in the prevalence of multimorbidity—a register-based population study. BMC Public Health 17(1):422-017-4314-8

  20. Thio CHL, Vart P, Kieneker LM, Snieder H, Gansevoort RT, Bültmann U (2020) Educational level and risk of chronic kidney disease: longitudinal data from the PREVEND study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 35(7):1211–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krishnasamy R, Gray NA (2018) Low socio-economic status adversely effects dialysis survival in Australia. Nephrology (Carlton) 23(5):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen HAR, Ekholm O, Davidsen M, Christensen AI (2019) The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics. BMC Med Res Methodol 19(1):91-019-0733-9

  23. Molsted S, Heaf J, Prescott L, Eidemak I (2005) Reliability testing of the Danish version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39(6):498–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Goodkin DA et al (2007) Factors associated with health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients in the DOPPS. Qual Life Res 16(4):545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Albatineh AN, Ibrahimou B (2019) Factors associated with quality-of-life among Kuwaiti patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Psychol Health Med 24(8):1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersen MB, Bjørkman AD, Pedersen M, Ekholm O, Molsted S (2019) Social inequality in lifestyle, motivation to change lifestyle and received health advice in individuals with diabetes: a nationwide study. Scand J Public Health 1403494819885727

  27. Molsted S, Aadahl M, Schou L, Eidemak I (2004) Self-rated health and employment status in chronic haemodialysis patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(2):174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware JE Jr., Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 health survey. In: Manual and interpretation guide. The Health institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

  29. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ziggie J Rifbjerg, Christine Sandbjerg, Lotte Prescott, Gabriel Notkin and Cecilie R Brauner for data collection. The study was financially supported by the Lundbeck Fund and the Danish Kidney Association.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Lundbeck Fund and the Danish Kidney Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stig Molsted.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Registration

The Data Protection Agency and the local ethical committee (H-6-2014-103) approved the study protocol.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molsted, S., Wendelboe, S., Flege, M.M. et al. The impact of marital and socioeconomic status on quality of life and physical activity in patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 2577–2582 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02826-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02826-6

Keywords

Navigation