Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis and management of small intestinal injury due to percutaneous renal access

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Define factors for proper diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal injury during procedures with percutaneous renal access, thus optimizing favorable outcomes and avoiding complications and death during conservative or surgical approaches.

Materials and methods

Bibliographic review of case reports available in the literature and presentation of data from an additional case have been carried out.

Results

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was the procedure that most frequently caused injury of the small intestine. Time for diagnosis of the lesion took up to 5 days after the intraoperative phase. When occurring in the intraoperative phase, perforation was identified by direct endoscopic visualization; a catheter was then placed inside the intestinal lumen and a conservative approach to the derived fistula was adopted, which led to successful outcomes in all cases. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom in cases diagnosed during the postoperative phase (75%). In the presence of signs of peritonitis, surgical intervention was performed, with favorable evolution in all cases.

Conclusions

Conservative management of small intestine injuries is possible when there is no peritoneal contamination. Its success factors include intraoperative diagnosis and non-transfixing lesions, which is more common in duodenal involvement. Laparotomy to clean the cavity associated with a corrective approach (enterorrhaphy or enterectomy with primary anastomosis) was successfully indicated in cases of late diagnosis with signs of peritonitis, a situation that is most commonly found in transfixing lesions of ileum and jejunum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Netto NR Jr, Lemos GC, Palma PC (1988) Staghorn calculi: percutaneous versus anatrophic nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 15(1–2):9–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kontothanassis D, Bissas A (1997) Biliary peritonitis complicating percutaneous nephrostomy. Int Urol Nephrol 29:529–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sacha K, Szewczyk W, Bar K (1996) Massive haemorrhage presenting as a complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Int Urol Nephrol 28:315–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondás J, Szentgyörgyi E, Váczi L et al (1994) Splenic injury: a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 26:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Kohlany KM, Telha KA, Al-Lahabi N (2017) Jejunal injury as a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: case report. J Endourol Case Rep 3(1):70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Assiri, Binsaleh S, Libman J (2005) Jejunal perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotrypsy. Sci World J 5:496–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Begliomini H, Mattos D (2002) Bowel perforation during percutaneous renal surgery. Int Braz J Urol 28(6):533–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumas A, Kumar Banerjee G, Tewari A (1994) Isolated duodenal injury during relook percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol 74:382–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed M, Reeve R (1995) Iatrogenic duodeno-cutaneous fistula at percutaneous nephrolithotomy managed conservatively. Br J Urol 75:416–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Santiago L, Bellman GC, Murphy J (1998) Small bowel and splenic injury during percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 159(6):2071–2072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Culkin DJ, Wheeler JS Jr, Canning JR (1985) Nephro-duodenal fistula: a complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 134(3):528–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saad KS, Hanno A, El-Nahas AR (2014) Injury of the ileum during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a pediatric patient. Can Urol Assoc J 8(3–4):E204–E206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viville C, Garbit JL, Firmin F (1995) Les perforations digestives dans la chirurgie percutanée du rein. Ann Urol (Paris) 29:11–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Winer AG, Hyams ES, Shah O (2009) Small bowel injury during percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement causing small bowel obstruction. Can J Urol 16(6):4950–4952

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oztürk H, Onen A, Otçu S (2003) Diagnostic delay increases morbidity in children with gastrointestinal perforation from blunt abdominal trauma. Surg Today 33(3):178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuttle DN, Yeh BM, Meng MV et al (2005) Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine and multiplanar reformmated CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1489–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopper KD, Sherman JL, Luethke JM (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162(2):443–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de La Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A et al (2011) The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25:1275–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simpson R, Martin R (1986) Use of a controlled fistula in the management of a major duodenal injury. Aust NZ Surg 56:167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH (2017) Management of colon perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 12 years of experience in a referral center. J Endourol 31(10):1032–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the work submitted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela Castellões Leite.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fanni, V.S.S., de Oliveira Ramos, L., Leite, M.C. et al. Diagnosis and management of small intestinal injury due to percutaneous renal access. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 869–873 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02726-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02726-1

Keywords

Navigation