Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of catheter exit-site infection in peritoneal dialysis patients: a pilot study

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study aimed to examine effect of chlorhexidine dressing in the prevention of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infection in PD patients.

Methods

This single-center pilot study recruited 50 incident PD patients to use weekly chlorhexidine dressing. The primary outcome was exit-site/tunnel infection rate. Secondary outcomes were peritonitis rate, time to first PD-related infection, infection-related hospitalization, technique and patient survival, adverse events, and chlorhexidine dressing acceptability. These clinical outcomes were compared with those of a historical cohort (2016–2017) using daily gentamicin cream.

Results

A total of 50 patients were recruited to use chlorhexidine and followed up for one year. The exit-site/tunnel infection rate was 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–0.22) and peritonitis rate was 0.07 (95% CI 0.01–0.19) episodes per patient-year with chlorhexidine dressing. The 1-year infection-free survival rates for exit-site/tunnel infection and peritonitis were 92% and 94%, respectively. The 1-year technique and patient survival rates were 86% and 96%, respectively. Overall, 12% of participants developed localized contact dermatitis with chlorhexidine. Most participants (73%) reported that chlorhexidine dressings were very acceptable. Compared to a historical cohort using gentamicin cream (n = 238), the chlorhexidine group had similar exit-site/tunnel infection rates (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.22–1.92) but had lower peritonitis rates (IRR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), and lower PD infection-related hospitalization rates (IRR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06–0.69) after adjusting for age, sex, race, primary kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

Weekly chlorhexidine dressing was associated with acceptable PD-related infection outcomes and was well-accepted by patients, although had a 12% rate of delayed localized contact dermatitis.

Trial registration number and date

The study was registered under www.clinicaltrials.gov with the reference number of NCT03406520 on 23 January 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data for this study is available from the corresponding author on appropriate request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Kavanagh D, Prescott GJ, Mactier RA (2004) Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in Scotland (1999–2002). Nephrol Dial Transplant 19(10):2584–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Ruiz L, Wang AY-M et al (2019) Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 14(1):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manera KE, Tong A, Craig JC, Shen J, Jesudason S, Cho Y et al (2019) An international Delphi survey helped develop consensus-based core outcome domains for trials in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 96(3):699–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehrotra R, Singh H (2013) Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis with simultaneous exit-site infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8(1):126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Diepen ATN, Tomlinson GA, Jassal SV (2012) The association between exit site infection and subsequent peritonitis among peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7(8):1266–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li PKT, Szeto CC, Piraino B, de Arteaga J, Fan S, Figueiredo AE et al (2016) ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int. 36(5):481–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Babu T, Rekasius V, Parada JP, Schreckenberger P, Challapalli M (2009) Mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-colonized patients at admission to a tertiary care medical center. J Clin Microbiol 47(7):2279–2280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Annigeri R, Conly J, Vas S, Dedier H, Prakashan KP, Bargman JM et al (2001) Emergence of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients using mupirocin prophylaxis to prevent exit-site infection. Perit Dial Int. 21(6):554–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hon PY, Koh TH, Tan TY, Krishnan P, Leong JW-Y, Jureen R et al (2014) Changing molecular epidemiology and high rates of mupirocin resistance among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Singaporean hospitals. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2(1):53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Hwiesh AK, Abdul-Rahman IS, Al-Muhanna FA, Al-Sulaiman MH, Al-Jondebi MS, Divino-Filho JC (2013) Prevention of peritoneal dialysis catheter infections in Saudi peritoneal dialysis patients: the emergence of high-level mupirocin resistance. Int J Artif Organs 36(7):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nessim SJ, Jassal SV (2012) Gentamicin-resistant infections in peritoneal dialysis patients using topical gentamicin exit-site prophylaxis: a report of two cases. Perit Dial Int 32(3):339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierce DA, Williamson JC, Mauck VS, Russell GB, Palavecino E, Burkart JM (2012) The effect on peritoneal dialysis pathogens of changing topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Perit Dial Int 32(5):525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein RA, Milstone AM, Passaretti CL, Perl TM (2008) Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 46(2):274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell AD, Day MJ (1993) Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. J Hosp Infect 25(4):229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Timsit J-F, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, Geffroy A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Pease S et al (2009) Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically Ill adults. JAMA 301(12):1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei L, Li Y, Li X, Bian L, Wen Z, Li M (2019) Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for the prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 19(1):429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Safdar N, O’Horo JC, Ghufran A, Bearden A, Didier ME, Chateau D et al (2014) Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med 42(7):1703–1713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen K, Cho Y, Pascoe EM, Hawley CM, Oliver V, Hughes KM et al (2017) The SIESTA trial: a randomized study investigating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of acupressure versus sham therapy for improving sleep quality in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med 21(2017):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hunsley J (1992) Development of the treatment acceptability questionnaire. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 14(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szeto C-C, Li PK-T, Johnson DW, Bernardini J, Dong J, Figueiredo AE et al (2017) ISPD catheter-related infection recommendations: 2017 update. Perit Dial Int. 37(2):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Htay H, Cho Y, Pascoe EM, Darssan D, Nadeau-Fredette A-C, Hawley C et al (2017) Center effects and peritoneal dialysis peritonitis outcomes: analysis of a national registry. Am J Kidney Dis. 71:814–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Htay H, Seng JJB, Yong MHA, Pang SC, Wu SY, Chan CM et al (2018) Comparison of clinical presentation and outcomes of peritonitis in the elderly and younger peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 39:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Htay H, Cho Y, Pascoe EM, Darssan D, Hawley C, Clayton PA et al (2017) Outcomes of Corynebacterium peritonitis: a multicenter registry analysis. Perit Dial Int 37(6):619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Htay H, Cho Y, Pascoe EM, Hawley C, Clayton PA, Borlace M et al (2018) Outcomes of Acinetobacter peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: a multicenter registry analysis. Perit Dial Int 38(4):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perl J, Fuller DS, Bieber BA, Boudville N, Kanjanabuch T, Ito Y et al (2020) Peritoneal dialysis-related infection rates and outcomes: results from the peritoneal dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (PDOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis 76(1):42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Htay H, Johnson DW, Wu SY, Oei EL, Foo MWY, Choo JCJ (2017) Comparison of topical chlorhexidine and mupirocin for the prevention of exit-site infection in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 37(3):266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bunke CM, Brier ME, Golper TA (1997) Outcomes of single organism peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: Gram negatives versus gram positives in the network 9 peritonitis study. Kidney Int 52(2):524–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weitz NA, Lauren CT, Weiser JA, LeBoeuf NR, Grossman ME, Biagas K et al (2013) Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated central access catheter dressings as a cause of erosive contact dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol 149(2):195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Garland JS, Alex CP, Mueller CD, Otten D, Shivpuri C, Harris MC et al (2001) A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates. Pediatrics 107(6):1431–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Ms Chue Xiuping, a clinical research coordinator, Medical ACP, Singhealth, Pte Ltd, a PD nurse, Ms Kok Su Fong, division of nursing, Singapore General Hospital, and physicians and nurses from peritoneal dialysis unit, Singapore General Hospital.

Funding

The study was supported by Singhealth New Investigator grant (to Htay Htay) and Johnson & Johnson Pte Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Htay Htay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Htay Htay has received consultancy fees and travel sponsorships from AWAK Technologies Pte Ltd. She has also received speaker’s honoraria and travel sponsorships from Baxter Healthcare. Marjorie Foo has received consultancy fees and travel sponsorships from AWAK Technologies Pte Ltd, and travel sponsorships from Baxter Healthcare. David Johnson has received grants from National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, consultancy fees, research grants, speaker’s honoraria and travel sponsorships from Baxter Healthcare and Fresenius Medical Care, consultancy fees from Astra Zeneca and AWAK, speaker’s honoraria and travel sponsorships from ONO, and travel sponsorships from Amgen. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by Singhealth Centralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB; reference number 2017/2698).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all 50 participants in the pilot study. The CIRB granted a waiver of informed consent for the historical control group as non-interventional study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Htay, H., Choo, J.C.J., Johnson, D.W. et al. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of catheter exit-site infection in peritoneal dialysis patients: a pilot study. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 803–812 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02674-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02674-w

Keywords

Navigation