Abstract
Objective
To explore the feasibility and safety of the Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to facilitate sacral neuromodulation programming procedure.
Method
For 22 patients who had previously participated in the phase III clinical trial for treating overactive bladder with the Tsinghua PINS sacral neuromodulation system during several Hospital, PINS Remote Tech was applied to perform postoperative parameter adjustment in order to evaluate the safety and reliability of this new technique. Telephone surveys on Remote Tech-related questionnaires were also conducted.
Results
17/22 patients underwent 26 parameter adjustments, average adjustment frequency was 1.53 times per person; the average adjustment time was 23.4 ± 5.1 min (15–32 min). The total effective rate of the Remote control was 14/17 (82.3%). 7/17 (41.1%) patients’ symptoms recurrence due to not knowing how to handle patient controller, these patients were instructed on how to use it correctly through Remote Tech even without reprogramming it. Other 10 patients received reprogramming. There was no discomfort during and after parameter adjustment. The questionnaire survey showed that the remote technology saved patients’ time and lowered financial costs, significantly improved patient satisfaction. All patients expressed their willingness to recommend it to other patients.
Conclusion
The PINS Remote Tech can significantly reduce the financial cost and provide a remote reprogram control service that is as safe and reliable as outpatient program control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-zahrani AA, Elzayat EA, Gajewski JB (2011) Long-term outcome and surgical interventions after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptoms: 14-year experience at 1 center. J Urol 185:981–986
van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesak-kers JP et al (2007) Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 178:2029–2034
Van Kerrebroeck PE, Marcelissen TA (2012) Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. World J Urol 30:445–450
Kessler TM, La Framboise D, Trelle S (2010) Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 58:865–874
Chen G, Song Yong, Ding Liu-Cheng et al. (2014) Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of sacral neuromodulation. Chin J Urol 35:1–5
Zhang Peng Z, Jianzhong Wu, Liyang et al. (2017) The initial experiences of sacral neuromodulation on non-neurogenic, non-obstructive dysuria. Chin J Urol 38(11):806–810
Peng Zhang, Zhi-jin Wu (2016) Yang yong et al. The initial experiences of sacral neuromodulation on refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Clin Urol 31(1):67–71
Burks FN, Diokno AC, Lajiness MJ (2008) Sacral neuromodulation reprogramming: is it an office burden? Int Urogynecol J 19(8):1137–1140
Govaert B, Rietveld MP, van Gemert WG (2011) The role of reprogramming in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13(1):78–81
Powell CRTroubleshooting (2018) Interstim sacral neuromodulation generators to recover function. Curr Urol Rep 20(10):86
Datta SN, Chaliha C, Singh A et al (2008) Sacral neurostimulation for urinary retention: 10-year experience from one UK centre. BJU Int 101:192
van Voskuilen AC, Oerlemans DJ, Weil EH et al (2006) Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study. Eur Urol 49:366
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from High Level Technical Talents in Beijing Health System (Grant No. 2015‑3‑030).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Self-designed questionnaire
1: Impressions of remote program control: ( ) (single answer)
A: very satisfaction B: satisfaction C: Basic satisfaction D: poor result
2: Expected program control frequency: ( ) (single answer)
A: once per week B: once every 1–3 months C: once every 3 months D none
3: Possible financial costs for each outpatient program control: ( ) (single answer)
A: 200 yuan B: 200–500 yuan C: 500–1000 yuan D: more than 1000 yuan
4: How remote program control can help patients: ( ) (multiple answers)
A: remote control program could provide expert-level
B: timely program control
C: obviate traveling, save costs
D: improve SNM efficiency probably
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, P., Zhang, Yg., Liao, L.M. et al. Application of Internet+-based Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to improve sacral neuromodulation programming procedure. Int Urol Nephrol 51, 627–632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02115-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02115-3