Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 583–603 | Cite as

Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review

  • Matheus Roque
  • Sandro C. Esteves
Urology - Review

Abstract

Varicocele, the leading cause of male infertility, can impair sperm quality and fertility via various oxidative stress mechanisms. An imbalance between excessive reactive oxygen species production and antioxidant protection causes alterations in nuclear and mitochondrial sperm DNA, thus rendering a subset of varicocele men less fertile. In particular, sperm DNA fragmentation is usually elevated in men with clinical varicocele in both abnormal and normal semen parameters by the current World Health Organization criteria. In this review, we discuss the evidence concerning the association between varicocele, oxidative stress, and SDF, and the possible mechanisms involved in infertility. Furthermore, we summarize the role of varicocele repair as a means of alleviating SDF and improving fertility. Lastly, we critically appraise the evidence-based algorithm recently issued by the Society for Translational Medicine aimed at guiding urologists on the use of SDF testing in men with varicocele seeking fertility. Current evidence based on careful review of published studies confirms the effectiveness of varicocelectomy as a means of both reducing oxidatively induced sperm DNA damage and potentially improving fertility. Varicocele repair should be offered as part of treatment option for male partners of infertile couples presenting with palpable varicoceles.

Keywords

Male infertility Oxidative stress Sperm DNA damage Sperm DNA fragmentation Varicocele Varicocele repair 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

MR participated in the acquisition of data, helped in data interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. SCE designed the study, helped in data interpretation and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

MR has nothing to disclose. SCE is a member of the advisory panel that developed the clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing based on clinical scenarios issued by the Society for Translational Medicine (http://www.thestm.org/about/internationAdvisoryCommitee).

References

  1. 1.
    Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A (2011) An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. [corrected]. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shiraishi K, Matsuyama H, Takihara H (2012) Pathophysiology of varicocele in male infertility in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Int J Urol 19:538–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Masson P, Brannigan RE (2014) The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 41:129–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Dohle G et al (2012) European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol 62:324–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology (2014) Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 102:1556–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2013) Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), London, p. 63 (clinical guideline; no. 156). http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG156. Accessed 8 Feb 2018
  7. 7.
    Miyaoka R, Esteves SC (2012) A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility. Adv Urol 2012:597495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tiseo BC, Esteves SC, Cocuzza MS (2016) Summary evidence on the effects of varicocele treatment to improve natural fertility in subfertile men. Asian J Androl 18:239–245PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agarwal A, Hamada A, Esteves SC (2012) Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 1. Nat Rev Urol 9:678–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2012) Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 2. Nat Rev Urol 10:26–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Desai NR, Prabakaran S, Tavares A, Sabanegh E (2009) Role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of varicocele and infertility. Urology 73:461–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zini A, Dohle G (2011) Are varicoceles associated with increased deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation? Fertil Steril 96:1283–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho CL, Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2016) Novel insights into the pathophysiology of varicocele and its association with reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation. Asian J Androl 18:186–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Esteves SC, Hamada A, Kondray V, Pitchika A, Agarwal A (2012) What every gynecologist should know about male infertility: an update. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:217–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tremellen K (2008) Oxidative stress and male infertility—a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update 14:243–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blumer CG, Restelli AE, Giudice PT, Soler TB, Fraietta R, Nichi M, Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP (2012) Effect of varicocele on sperm function and semen oxidative stress. BJU Int 109:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aitken RJ, Krausz C (2001) Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction 122:497–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seli E, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Moffatt O, Sakkas D (2004) Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 82:378–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A (2008) Sperm DNa damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 23:2663–2668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, Rajkhowa M, Miller D, Lewis S, Kirkman-Brown J, Coomarasamy A (2012) The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 27:2908–2917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eisenberg ML, Sapra KJ, Kim SD, Chen Z, Buck Louis GM (2017) Semen quality and pregnancy loss in a contemporary cohort of couples recruited before conception: data from Longitudinal Investigation on Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study. Fertil Steril 108:613–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Esteves SC, Gosálvez J, López-Fernández C, Núñez-Calonge R, Caballero P, Agarwal A, Fernández J (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of sperm DNA degradation index (DDSi) as a potential noninvasive biomarker to identify men with varicocele-associated infertility. Int Urol Nephrol 47:1471–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2016) Afterword to varicocele and male infertility: current concepts and future perspectives. Asian J Androl 18:319–322PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Griveau JF, Le Lannou D (1997) Reactive oxygen species and human spermatozoa: physiology and pathology. Int J Androl 20:61–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mostafa T, As T, Imam H, El-Nashar AR, Osman IA (2009) Seminal reactive oxygen species—antioxidant relationship in fertile males with and without varicocele. Andrologia 41:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zylbersztejn DS, Andreoni C, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Borsari L, Souza GH, Bertolla RP, Fraietta R (2013) Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril 99:92–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agarwal A, Cho C-L, Esteves SC, Majzoub A (2017) Reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol 6(Suppl 4):S695–S696.  https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.05.40 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mehraban D, Ansari M, Keyhan H, Sedighi Gilani M, Naderi G, Esfehani F (2005) Comparison of nitric oxide concentration in seminal fluid between infertile patients with and without varicocele and normal fertile men. J Urol 2:106–110Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sakamoto Y, Ishikawa T, Kondo Y, Yamaguchi K, Fujisawa M (2008) The assessment of oxidative stress in infertile patients with and without varicocele. BJU Int 101:1547–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pasqualotto FF, Sundaram A, Sharma RK, Borges E Jr, Pasqualotto EB, Agarwal A (2008) Semen quality and oxidative stress scores in fertile and infertile patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril 2008(89):602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mostafa T, Anis TH, El-Nashar A, Imam H, Othman IA (2001) Varicocelectomy reduces reactive oxygen species levels and increases antioxidant activity of seminal plasma from infertile men with varicocele. Int J Androl 24:261–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Köksal IT, Tefekli A, Usta M, Erol H, Abbasoglu S, Kadioglu A (2000) The role of reactive oxygen species in testicular dysfunction associated with varicocele. BJU Int 86:549–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Allamaneni SS, Naughton CK, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A (2004) Increased seminal reactive oxygen species levels in patients with varicoceles correlate with varicocele grade but not with testicular size. Fertil Steril 82:1684–1686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ishikawa T, Fujioka H, Ishimura T, Takenaka A, Fujisawa M (2007) Increased testicular 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in patients with varicocele. BJU Int 100:863–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abd-Elmoaty MA, Saleh R, Sharma R, Agarwal A (2010) Increased levels of oxidants and reduced antioxidants in semen of infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 94:1531–1534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A (2000) Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics, and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 73:459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma RK, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A (1999) The reactive oxygen species-total antioxidant capacity score is a new measure of oxidative stress to predict male infertility. Hum Reprod 14:2801–2807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hendin BN, Kolettis PN, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A (1999) Varicocele is associated with elevated spermatozoal reactive oxygen species production and diminished seminal plasma antioxidant capacity. J Urol 161:1831–1834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Esteves SC, Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A (2017) A strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats (SWOT) analysis on the clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in specific male infertility scenarios. Tranl Androl Urol 6:S734–S760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hurtado de Catalfo GE, Ranieri-Casilla A, Marra FA, de Alaniz MJ, Marra CA (2007) Oxidative stress biomarkers and hormonal profile in human patients undergoing varicocelectomy. Int J Androl 30:519–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen SS, Huang WJ, Chang LS, Wei YH (2008) Attenuation of oxidative stress after varicocelectomy in subfertile patients with varicocele. J Urol 179:639–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Esteves SC, Sharma RK, Gosálvez J, Agarwal A (2014) A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility. Int Urol Nephrol 2014(46):1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Esteves SC, Chan P (2015) A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the evaluation of the infertile male. Int Urol Nephrol 47:1441–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Clavijo RI, Carrasquillo R, Ramasamy R (2017) Varicoceles: prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men. Fertil Steril 108:364–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gat Y, Zukerman Z, Chakraborty J, Gornish M (2005) Varicocele, hypoxia and male infertility. Fluid mechanics analysis of the impaired testicular venous drainage system. Hum Reprod 20:2614–2619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gat Y, Gornish M, Navon U, Chakraborty J, Bachar GN, Ben-Shlomo I (2006) Right varicocele and hypoxia, crucial factors in male infertility: fluid mechanics analysis in male infertility: fluid mechanics analysis of the impaired testicular drainage system. Reprod Biomed Online 13:510–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ambrosini G, Nath AK, Sierra-Honigmann MR, Flores-Riveros J (2002) Transcriptional activation of the human leptin gene in response to hypoxia. Involvement of hypoxia inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem 277:34601–34609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A (2004) Relationship of interleukin-6 with semen characteristics and oxidative stress in patients with varicocele. Urology 64:1010–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sahin Z, Celik-Ozenci C, Akkoyunlu G, Korgun ET, Acar N, Erdogru T, Demir R, Ustunel I (2006) Increased expression of interleukin-1α and interleukin-1β is associated with experimental varicocele. Fertil Steril 85(Suppl 1):1265–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ito H, Fuse H, Minagawa H, Kawamura K, Murakami M, Shimazaki J (1982) Internal spermatic vein prostaglandins in varicocele patients. Fertil Steril 37:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Benoff S, Hurley IR, Barcia M, Mandel FS, Cooper GW, Hershlag A (1997) A potential role for cadmium in the etiology of varicocele-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 67:336–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Benoff SH, Millan C, Hurley IR, Napolitano B, Marmar JL (2004) Bilateral increased apoptosis and bilateral accumulation of cadmium in infertile men with left varicocele. Hum Reprod 19:616–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jeng SY, Wu SM, Lee JD (2009) Cadmium accumulation and metallothionein overexpression in internal spermatic vein of patients with varicocele. Urology 73:1231–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lewis SE, John Aitken R, Conner SJ, Iuliis GD, Evenson DP, Henkel R, Giwercman A, Charagozloo O (2013) The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 27:325–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gosálvez J, Caballero P, López-Fernández C, Ortega L, Guijarro JA, Fernández JL, Johnston SD, Nuñez-Calonge R (2013) Can DNA fragmentation of neat or swim-up spermatozoa be used to predict pregnancy following ICSI of fertile oocyte donors? Asian J Androl 15:812–818PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Feijó CM, Esteves SC (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of sperm chromatin dispersion test to evaluate sperm deoxyribonucleic acid damage in men with unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 101:58–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Gonsálvez J, Agarwal A (2016) Specialized sperm function tests in varicocele and the future of andrology laboratory. Asian J Androl 18:205PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gosálvez J, Lopez-Fernandez C, Fernandez JL et al (2015) Unpacking the mysteries of sperm DNA fragmentation: ten frequently asked questions. J Reprod Biotechnol Fertil 4:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Esteves SC (2016) Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet 33:1319–1335PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Majzoub A, Agarwal A, Cho CL, Esteves SC (2017) Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: a cross sectional survey on current practices of fertility specialists. Transl Androl Urol 6:S710–S719PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sharma R, Ahmad G, Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2016) Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay using bench top flow cytometer for evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation in fertility laboratories: protocol, reference values, and quality control. J Assist Reprod Genet 33:291–300PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Avendaño C, Franchi A, Duran H, Oehninger S (2010) DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril 94:549–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Sweeney A, Lynch CD, Kim S, Maisog JM, Gore-Langton R, Eisenberg ML, Chen Z (2014) Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study. Fertil Steril 101:453–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Agarwal A, Cho CL, Esteves SC (2016) Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016(28):164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sakkas D, Alvarez JG (2010) Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril 93:1027–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Esteves SC, Sánchez-Martín F, Sánchez-Martín P, Schneider DT, Gosálvez J (2015) Comparison of reproductive outcome in oligozoospermic men with high sperm DNA fragmentation undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Fertil Steril 104:1398–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C (2004) Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 19:611–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, Giwercman A (2007) Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 22:174–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC (2016) Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 18:163–170PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Smith R, Kaune H, Parodi D, Madariaga M, Rios R, Morales I, Castro A (2006) Increased sperm DNA damage in patients with varicocele: relationship with seminal oxidative stress. Hum Reprod 21:986–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wang YJ, Zhang RQ, Lin YJ, Zhang RG, Zhang WL (2012) Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 25:307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Janghorban-Laricheh E, Ghazavi-Khorasgani N, Tavalaee M, Zohrabi D, Abbasi H, Nasr-Esfahani MH (2012) An association between sperm PLCζ levels and varicocele? J Assist Reprod Genet 33:1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vivas-Acevedo G, Lozano-Hernández R, Camejo MI (2014) Varicocele decreases epididymal neutral α-glucosidase and is associated with alteration of nuclear DNA and plasma membrane in spermatozoa. BJU Int 113:642–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Marmar JL (2016) The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery. Asian J Androl 18:171–178PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Camargo M, Intasqui P, Bertolla RP (2016) Proteomic profile of seminal plasma in adolescents and adults with treated and untreated varicocele. Asian J Androl 18:194–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kruger T (2016) Critical appraisal of conventional semen analysis in the context of varicocele. Asian J Androl 18:202–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, Agarwal A (2016) Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 18:246–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Esteves SC, Roque M, Agarwal A (2016) Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in men with treated and untreated varicocele: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 18:254–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zini A, Blumenfeld A, Libman J et al (2005) Beneficial effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod 20:1018–1021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Werthman P, Wixon R, Kasperson K, Evenson DP (2008) Significant decrease in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 90:1800–1804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Moskovtsev SI, Lecker I, Mullen JB, Jarvi K, Willis J, White J, Lo KC (2009) Cause-specific treatment in patients with high sperm DNA damage resulted in significant DNA improvement. Syst Biol Reprod Med 55:109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Smit M, Romijn JC, Wildhagen MF, Veldhoven JL, Weber RF, Dohle GR (2010) Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. J Urol 183:270–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kadioglu TC, Aliyev E, Celtik M (2014) Microscopic varicocelectomy significantly decreases the sperm DNA fragmentation index in patients with infertility. Biomed Res Int 2014:695713PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Telli O, Sarici H, Kabar M, Ozgur BC, Resorlu B, Bozkurt S (2015) Does varicocelectomy affect DNA fragmentation in infertile patients? Indian J Urol 31:116–119PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sun XL, Wang JL, Peng YP, Gao QQ, Song T, Yu W, Xu ZP, Chen Y, Dai YT (2017) Bilateral is superior to unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile males with left clinical and right subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1749-x PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Zaazaa A, Adel A, Fahmy I, Elkhiat Y, Awaad AA, Mostafa T (2018) Effect of varicocelectomy and/or mast cells stabilizer on sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile patients with varicocele. Andrology 6:146–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lacerda JI, Del Giudice PT, da Silva BF, Nichi M, Fariello RM, Fraietta R, Restelli AE, Blumer CG, Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP (2011) Adolescent varicocele: improved sperm function after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril 95:994–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Li F, Yamaguchi K, Okada K, Matsushita K, Ando M, Chiba K, Yue H, Fujisawa M (2012) Significant improvement of sperm DNA quality after microsurgical repair of varicocele. Syst Biol Reprod Med 58:274–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Baker K, McGill J, Sharma R, Agarwal A, Sabanegh E Jr (2013) Pregnancy after varicocelectomy: impact of postoperative motility and DFI. Urology 81:760–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Pourmand G, Movahedin M, Dehghani S, Mehrsai A, Ahmadi A, Pourhosein M, Hoseini M, Ziloochi M, Heidari F, Beladi L, Noori M (2014) Does L-carnitine therapy add any extra benefit to standard inguinal varicocelectomy in terms of deoxyribonucleic acid damage or sperm quality factor indices: a randomized study. Urology 84:821–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tavalaee M, Bahreinian M, Barekat F, Abbasi H, Nasr-Esfahani MH (2015) Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm functional characteristics and DNA methylation. Andrologia 47:904–909PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Vignera La, Condorelli R, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE (2012) Effects of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial function, chromatin condensation, and apoptosis. J Androl 2012(33):389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ni K, Steger K, Yang H, Wang H, Hu K, Chen B (2014) Sperm protamine mRNA ratio and DNA fragmentation index represent reliable clinical biomarkers for men with varicocele after microsurgical varicocele ligation. J Urol 192:170–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Mohammed EE, Mosad E, Zahran AM, Hameed DA, Taha EA, Mohamed MA (2015) Acridine orange and flow cytometry: which is better to measure the effect of varicocele on sperm DNA integrity? Adv Urol 2015:814150PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Alhathal N, San Gabriel M, Zini A (2016) Beneficial effects of microsurgical varicocoelectomy on sperm maturation, DNA fragmentation, and nuclear sulfhydryl groups: a prospective trial. Andrology 4:1204–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ni K, Steger K, Yang H, Wang H, Hu K, Zhang T, Chen B (2016) A Comprehensive investigation of sperm DNA damage and oxidative stress injury in infertile patients with subclinical, normozoospermic and astheno/oligozoospermic clinical varicocele. Andrology 4:816–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Abdelbaki SA, Sabry JH, Al-Adl AM, Sabry HH (2017) The impact of coexisting sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal oxidative stress on the outcome of varicocelectomy in infertile patients: a prospective controlled study. Arab J Urol 15:131–139PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    García-Peiró A, Ribas-Maynou J, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Checa MA, Nikolaou A, Amengual MJ, Abad C, Benet J (2014) Multiple determinations of sperm DNA fragmentation show that varicocelectomy is not indicated for infertile patients with subclinical varicocele. Biomed Res Int 2014:181396PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gual-Frau J, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Hannaoui N, Checa MA, Ribas-Maynou J, Lozano I, Nikolaou A, Benet J, García-Peiró A, Prats J (2015) Oral antioxidant treatment partly improves integrity of human sperm DNA in infertile grade I varicocele patients. Hum Fertil (Camb) 18:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    American Urological Association and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2001) Report on varicocele and infertility: an AUA best practice policy and ASRM practice committee report. https://www.auanet.org/Documents/education/clinical/Varicocele-Archive.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2017
  101. 101.
    Shridharani A, Owen RC, Elkelany OO et al (2016) The significance of clinical practice guidelines on adult varicocele detection and management. Asian J Androl 18:269–275PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Esteves SC (2014) Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol 40:443–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Esteves SC, Zini A, Aziz N, Alvarez JG, Sabanegh ES Jr, Agarwal A (2012) Critical appraisal of World Health Organization’s new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men. Urology 79:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Sharma R, Harlev A, Agarwal A, Esteves SC (2016) Cigarette smoking and semen quality: a new meta-analysis examining the effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory methods for the examination of human semen. Eur Urol 70:635–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A, Esteves SC (2017) The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Trans Androl Urol 6:S720–S733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Roque M, Esteves SC (2016) A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the diagnosis and management of varicocele in children and adolescents. Asian J Androl 18:262–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Esteves SC, Agarwal A, Majzoub A (2017) Unraveling the utility and limitations of clinical practice guidelines. Transl Androl Urol 6:S506–S508PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Esteves SC, Agarwal A, Majzoub A (2017) Best practice statements are not intended to dictate an exclusive course of management. Trans Androl Urol 6:S683–S684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N, Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group (2014) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 348:g3725PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive MedicineRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction ClinicCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical SciencesUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil
  4. 4.Faculty of HealthAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations