This article updates the qualitative research on Iran reported in the 2012 article by Tong et al. “The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research” (Tong et al. in Transpl Int 25:1138–1149, 2012). The basic approach used in the Tong et al. article is applied to a more recent and more comprehensive study of Iranian living organ donors, providing a clearer picture of what compensated organ donation is like in Iran since the national government began regulating compensated donation. Iran is the only country in the world where kidney selling is legal, regulated, and subsidized by the national government. This article focuses on three themes: (1) coercion and other pressures to donate, (2) donor satisfaction with their donation experience, and (3) whether donors fear social stigma. We found no evidence of coercion, but 68% of the paid living organ donors interviewed felt pressure to donate due to extreme poverty or other family pressures. Even though 27% of the living kidney donors interviewed said they were satisfied with their donation experience, 74% had complaints about the donation process or its results, including some of the donors who said they were satisfied. In addition, 84% of donors indicated they feared experiencing social stigma because of their kidney donation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Note that “buying power” is a different concept than “exchange rate”. A detailed explanation of why “buying power” is a better measure for understanding what living organ donors are paid in Iran is provided in The Kidney Sellers (p. 212) .
All the quotes and details about donors are about men unless the donor is specifically identified as a woman.
Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G et al (2012) The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Transpl Int 25:1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01534.x
Zargooshi J (2001) Iranian kidney donors: motivations and relations with recipients. J Urol 165:386–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200102000-00008
Zargooshi J (2001) Quality of life of Iranian kidney donors. J Urol 166:1790–1799. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200111000-00040
Tober DM (2007) Kidneys and controversies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: the case of organ sale. Body Soc 13:151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x07082257
Ruznamehi RJII (1997) The bill on kidney donors. The Official Gazette of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Byelaw on Kidney Donors. No. 15146
Center for Ethical Solutions (CES) (2008) Documentary footage from Iran. U.S. National Library of Medicine Historical Audiovisuals Accession #2017-04 (2017)
IRODaT. In: IRODaT—International Registry on Organ Donation and Transplantation. http://www.irodat.ORG/. Accessed 7 May 2017
Fry-Revere S (2014) The kidney sellers: a journey of discovery in Iran. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, North Calolina
Bolton L (UNOS Policy Department) (Open for public comment Jan. 23, 2014-March 24, 2017) A white paper addressing financial incentives for organ donation a white paper addressing financial incentives for organ donation, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network / United Network for Organ Sharing Public Comment Proposal
Shivayogi P (2013) Vulnerable population and methods for their safeguard. Perspect Clin Res 4:53. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.106389
Ghods AJ, Savaj S (2006) Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.00700206
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights
No animals were used in the study.
An IRB letter that indicates that IRB approval is not needed for this qualitative ethnographic study is attached.
Authors are listed in the order in which they joined the project. The affiliations listed are the relevant affiliations the authors had while working on this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Fry-Revere, S., Chen, D., Bastani, B. et al. Coercion, dissatisfaction, and social stigma: an ethnographic study of compensated living kidney donation in Iran. Int Urol Nephrol (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1824-y
- Living kidney donation
- Paid organ donation
- Ethnographic study
- Human rights
- Social justice
- Donor satisfaction
- Medical ethics
- Transplant ethics
- Living organ donation