Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of bioimpedance analysis estimated “dry weight” in maintenance dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Nephrology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Volume overload is a common complication in patients with end-stage kidney disease who undergo maintenance dialysis therapy and associated with hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality in this population. Although bioimpedance analysis (BIA), an objective method to assess overhydration, is associated with poor outcomes in observational studies, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) the results were conflicting. We have examined the role of BIA for assessing the “dry weight” and fluid status in order to improve fluid overload in comparison with a control or clinical-based prescription in patients with ESKD receiving haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

Methods

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs in which BIA was used to improve fluid overload and assess the effect on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, systolic blood pressure and volume control and arterial stiffness were included.

Results

Seven RCTs with 1312 patients could be included in this review. In low-to-medium quality of the evidence, the use of BIA did not reduce all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.87, 95% CI 0.54–1.39) and had small to no effect on body change, but it improved systolic blood pressure control (mean difference (MD) −2.73 mmHg, 95% CI −5.00 to −0.46 mmHg) and reduce overhydration, as measured by BIA, with 0.43 L [(MD), 95% CI 0.71–0.15 L].

Conclusion

In ESKD patients, BIA-based interventions for correction of overhydration have little to no effect on all-cause mortality, whereas BIA improved systolic blood pressure control. Our results should be interpreted with caution as the size and power of the included studies are low. Further studies, larger or with a longer follow-up period, should be performed to better describe the effect of BIA-based strategies on survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ok E, Asci G, Chazot C, Ozkahya M, Mees EJ (2016) Controversies and problems of volume control and hypertension in haemodialysis. Lancet, London

  2. de Jager DJ, Grootendorst DC, Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Tomas LM, Ansell D et al (2009) Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality among patients starting dialysis. JAMA 302(16):1782–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Chen SC (2015) United states renal data system public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl 5(1):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake PG, Bargman JM, Brimble KS, Davison SN, Hirsch D, McCormick BB et al (2011) Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations on peritoneal dialysis adequacy 2011. Perit Dial Int J Int Soc Perit Dial 31(2):218–239

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wabel P, Moissl U, Chamney P, Jirka T, Machek P, Ponce P et al (2008) Towards improved cardiovascular management: the necessity of combining blood pressure and fluid overload. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 23(9):2965–2971

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chazot C, Wabel P, Chamney P, Moissl U, Wieskotten S, Wizemann V (2012) Importance of normohydration for the long-term survival of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 27(6):2404–2410

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal R (2010) Hypervolemia is associated with increased mortality among hemodialysis patients. Hypertension 56(3):512–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paniagua R, Ventura MD, Avila-Diaz M, Hinojosa-Heredia H, Mendez-Duran A, Cueto-Manzano A et al (2010) NT-proBNP, fluid volume overload and dialysis modality are independent predictors of mortality in ESRD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 25(2):551–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wizemann V, Wabel P, Chamney P, Zaluska W, Moissl U, Rode C et al (2009) The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 24(5):1574–1579

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wabel P, Chamney P, Moissl U, Jirka T (2009) Importance of whole-body bioimpedance spectroscopy for the management of fluid balance. Blood Purif 27(1):75–80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Machek P, Jirka T, Moissl U, Chamney P, Wabel P (2010) Guided optimization of fluid status in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 25(2):538–544

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marcelli D, Usvyat LA, Kotanko P, Bayh I, Canaud B, Etter M et al (2015) Body composition and survival in dialysis patients: results from an international cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN 10(7):1192–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Onofriescu M, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, Apetrii M, Nistor I, Kanbay M et al (2014) Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found 64(1):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hur E, Usta M, Toz H, Asci G, Wabel P, Kahvecioglu S et al (2013) Effect of fluid management guided by bioimpedance spectroscopy on cardiovascular parameters in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found 61(6):957–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JPT GSe (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org

  16. Wong MMY, Craig JC, Levin A, Strippoli GFM. Interventions for promoting adherence to fluid intake and dietary salt restriction in people with end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014(11)

  17. Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy 2006 Work Group (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S91–S97. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.016

  18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Darlan F (2010) Comparacao da pressao arterial, aferida por mapa apos sessao de hemodialise, em pacientes submetidos a avaliacao clinica de bioimpedancia, para determinacao de peso seco. Dissertacao de Mestrado;Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul

  20. Huan-Sheng C, Yeong-Chang C, Ming-Hsing H, Fan-Lieh T, Chu-Cheng L, Tsai-Kun W et al (2016) Application of bioimpedance spectroscopy in Asian dialysis patients (ABISAD-III): a randomized controlled trial for clinical outcomes. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1897–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ponce P, Pham J, Gligoric-Fuerer O, Kreuzberg U (2014) Fluid management in haemodialysis: conventional versus body composition monitoring (BCM) supported management of overhydrated patients. Port J Nephrol Hypertens 28:239–248

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo YJ, Lu XH, Woods F, Wang T (2011) Volume control in peritoneal dialysis patients guided by bioimpedance spectroscopy assessment. Blood Purif 31(4):296–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan BK, Yu Z, Fang W, Lin A, Ni Z, Qian J et al (2016) Longitudinal bioimpedance vector plots add little value to fluid management of peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 89(2):487–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hur E, Usta M, Toz H, Asci G, Wabel P, Kahvecioglu S et al (2013) Effect of fluid management guided by bioimpedance spectroscopy on cardiovascular parameters in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 61(6):957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Onofriescu M, Siriopol D, Voroneanu L, Hogas S, Nistor I, Apetrii M et al (2015) Overhydration, cardiac function and survival in hemodialysis patients. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0135691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dekker MJ, Marcelli D, Canaud BJ, Carioni P, Wang Y, Grassmann A et al (2017) Impact of fluid status and inflammation and their interaction on survival: a study in an international hemodialysis patient cohort. Kidney Int 91(5):1214–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reddan DN, Szczech LA, Hasselblad V, Lowrie EG, Lindsay RM, Himmelfarb J et al (2005) Intradialytic blood volume monitoring in ambulatory hemodialysis patients: a randomized trial. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN 16(7):2162–2169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Davies SJ, Garcia Lopez E, Woodrow G, Donovan K, Plum J, Williams P et al (2008) Longitudinal relationships between fluid status, inflammation, urine volume and plasma metabolites of icodextrin in patients randomized to glucose or icodextrin for the long exchange. Nephrol Dial Transpl 23(9):2982–2988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong A, Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Wheeler DC, Evangelidis N, Tugwell P et al (2017) Establishing core outcome domains in hemodialysis: report of the standardized outcomes in nephrology-hemodialysis (SONG-HD) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis 69(1):97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moissl UM, Wabel P, Chamney PW, Bosaeus I, Levin NW, Bosy-Westphal A et al (2006) Body fluid volume determination via body composition spectroscopy in health and disease. Physiol Meas 27(9):921–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Davies SJ, Davenport A (2014) The role of bioimpedance and biomarkers in helping to aid clinical decision-making of volume assessments in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 86(3):489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ionut Nistor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Adrian Covic received speaker honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Fresenius Medical Care and Abbott and is a member of the European Renal Best Practices Board. All the other authors have nothing to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Covic, A., Ciumanghel, AI., Siriopol, D. et al. Value of bioimpedance analysis estimated “dry weight” in maintenance dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 2231–2245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1698-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1698-4

Keywords

Navigation