Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vaporize, anatomically vaporize or enucleate the prostate? The flexible use of the GreenLight laser

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

GreenLight laser has gained increasing acceptance as a less invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH/LUTS). Three surgical options were developed: standard photovaporization (PVP), anatomical PVP and GreenLight enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP); however, literature lacks a direct comparison among the procedures. Aim of the present study is to compare the three techniques in a multicentre series of patients.

Methods

Data were collected from consecutive patients with indication to surgical management of BPH/LUTS in five institutions. Patients underwent standard PVP, anatomical PVP or GreenLEP according to surgeon preferences. Standard parameters associated with transurethral prostate surgery were documented prior surgery and during the follow-up. Patients’ perception of improvement was measured using a single-item scale. Early (within first 30 post-operative days) and delayed post-operative complications were recorded. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate analysis were used.

Results

We evaluate 367 consecutive patients (mean age 69.1 years). Median prostate size and PSA were 68 ml (IQR 50–90) and 2.8 ng/ml (IQR 1.7–4.3), respectively. The median operative time and applied energy were 60 min (IQR 45–75) and 250 kJ (IQR 160–364). Catheterization time and median post-operative stay were 1 and 2 days. No patient was transfused. The overall median Q max values increased for 8–19 ml/s (p < 0.05), median International Prostate Symptoms Score decreased from 24 to 7 (p < 0.05). A total of 7.4% urinary retention, 33.4% bothersome storage symptoms, 2.5% short-term stress incontinence were recorded. Three heart attacks, one pulmonary embolism and one death occurred. Prostate volume was a predictive factor for post-operative storage symptoms (p = 0.049). Nine percentage of patients experienced long-term complications (4, 0.9 and 0.9% of urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture and prostatic fossa sclerosis, respectively) with 2.5% of long-term stress urinary incontinence (conservatively managed). The reintervention rate was 6%. Late complications were associated at univariate analysis with pharmacological therapy (combination therapy vs. alpha blockers alone vs. none: p value = 0.042) and with the surgical approach (standard PVP vs. anatomical PVP vs. GreenLEP p value = 0.011). The patients’ perception of satisfaction was 68% “greatly improved”, 27% “improved”, 4% “not changed” and 1% “worsened” with no differences between techniques.

Conclusion

The availability of three different GreenLight laser techniques allows surgeons with different skills to safety use this technology that remains effective with high patient satisfaction. Anatomical vaporization seems to guarantee the best balance between functional outcomes, surgical procedures and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BPH:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

180-W XPS GL laser:

GreenLight XPS 180-W laser

PVP:

Photovaporization of the prostate

GreenLEP:

GreenLight laser enucleation of the prostate

IPSS:

International Prostate Symptom Score

Q max :

Maximum urinary flow

PVR:

Post-void residual of urine

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

LMWH:

Low molecular weight heparin

HoLEP:

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate

References

  1. Sato K, Obinata D, Funakoshi D et al (2016) Efficacies of transurethral prostate enucleation by bipolar system for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol 68(4):337–341

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cindolo L, Pirozzi L, Fanizza C et al (2015) Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study. Eur Urol 68:418–425. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cindolo L, Pirozzi L, Sountoulides P et al (2015) Patient’s adherence on pharmacological therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is different: is combination therapy better than monotherapy? BMC Urol 15:96. doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0090-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts WW (2016) New technologies in benign prostatic hyperplasia management. Curr Opin Urol 26:254–258. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berardinelli F, Hinh P, Wang R (2009) Minimally invasive surgery in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol 61:269–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gravas S, Bach T, Bachmann A, et al (2015) EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In: Uroweb. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Non-Neurogenic-Male-LUTS_LR.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2016

  7. Castellan P, Castellucci R, Schips L, Cindolo L (2015) Safety, efficacy and reliability of 180-W GreenLight laser technology for prostate vaporization: review of the literature. World J Urol 33:599–607. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1490-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomez-Sancha F (2015) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: has it come of age? Curr Opin Urol 25:40–44. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez Sancha F, Rivera VC, Georgiev G et al (2015) Common trend: move to enucleation—is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol 33:539–547. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1339-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Misrai V, Kerever S, Phe V et al (2016) Direct comparison of GreenLight laser XPS photoselective prostate vaporization and GreenLight laser en bloc enucleation of the prostate in enlarged glands greater than 80 ml: a study of 120 patients. J Urol 195:1027–1032. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson B, Harrell FE (1990) Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 39:205–217. doi:10.2307/2347760

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone BV, Chughtai B, Kaplan SA et al (2016) GreenLight laser for prostates over 100 ml: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Urol 26:28–34. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elshal AM, Elkoushy MA, El-Nahas AR et al (2015) GreenLightTM laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 193:927–934. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KS, Choi JB, Bae WJ et al (2016) Comparison of photoselective vaporization versus holmium laser enucleation for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia in a small prostate volume. PLoS ONE 11:e0156133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bachmann A, Muir GH, Collins EJ et al (2012) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: early safety, efficacy, and perioperative outcome after 201 procedures. Eur Urol 61:600–607. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Zvi T, Hueber P-A, Liberman D et al (2013) GreenLight XPS 180 W vs HPS 120 W laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective comparative analysis after 200 cases in a single-center study. Urology 81:853–858. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA et al (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384–397. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shigemura K, Tanaka K, Yamamichi F et al (2016) Comparison of predictive factors for postoperative incontinence of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by the surgeons’ experience during learning curve. Int Neurourol J 20:59–68. doi:10.5213/inj.1630396.198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Robert G, Cornu J-N, Fourmarier M et al (2016) Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 117:495–499. doi:10.1111/bju.13124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

LC and GF contributed to project development, data analysis and manuscript writing. LC, LR, PD, CD and GF collected the data. CD and GF involved in supervision. LC and PD performed project development, manuscript writing and editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Cindolo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors do surgical tutorship for AMS and received honoraria for their tutorship.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cindolo, L., Ruggera, L., Destefanis, P. et al. Vaporize, anatomically vaporize or enucleate the prostate? The flexible use of the GreenLight laser. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 405–411 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1494-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1494-6

Keywords

Navigation